The Discrepancy Between Simulation and Observation of Electric Fields in Collisionless Shocks

Recent time series observations of electric fields within collisionless shocks have shown that the fluctuating, electrostatic fields can be in excess of one hundred times that of the quasi-static electric fields. That is, the largest amplitude electric fields occur at high frequencies, not low. In c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lynn B. Wilson, Li-Jen Chen, Vadim Roytershteyn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fspas.2020.592634/full
_version_ 1818930774918823936
author Lynn B. Wilson
Li-Jen Chen
Vadim Roytershteyn
author_facet Lynn B. Wilson
Li-Jen Chen
Vadim Roytershteyn
author_sort Lynn B. Wilson
collection DOAJ
description Recent time series observations of electric fields within collisionless shocks have shown that the fluctuating, electrostatic fields can be in excess of one hundred times that of the quasi-static electric fields. That is, the largest amplitude electric fields occur at high frequencies, not low. In contrast, many if not most kinetic simulations show the opposite, where the quasi-static electric fields dominate, unless they are specifically tailored to examine small-scale instabilities. Further, the shock ramp thickness is often observed to fall between the electron and ion scales while many simulations tend to produce ramp thicknesses at least at or above ion scales. This raises numerous questions about the role of small-scale instabilities and about the ability to directly compare simulations with observations.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T04:06:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a5d7a56085fd40c5a4118483cefd9d50
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-987X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T04:06:03Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
spelling doaj.art-a5d7a56085fd40c5a4118483cefd9d502022-12-21T19:54:02ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences2296-987X2021-01-01710.3389/fspas.2020.592634592634The Discrepancy Between Simulation and Observation of Electric Fields in Collisionless ShocksLynn B. Wilson0Li-Jen Chen1Vadim Roytershteyn2NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, Greenbelt, MD, United StatesNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, Greenbelt, MD, United StatesSpace Science Institute, Boulder, CO, United StatesRecent time series observations of electric fields within collisionless shocks have shown that the fluctuating, electrostatic fields can be in excess of one hundred times that of the quasi-static electric fields. That is, the largest amplitude electric fields occur at high frequencies, not low. In contrast, many if not most kinetic simulations show the opposite, where the quasi-static electric fields dominate, unless they are specifically tailored to examine small-scale instabilities. Further, the shock ramp thickness is often observed to fall between the electron and ion scales while many simulations tend to produce ramp thicknesses at least at or above ion scales. This raises numerous questions about the role of small-scale instabilities and about the ability to directly compare simulations with observations.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fspas.2020.592634/fullPIC simulationelectric field measurementkinetic instabilitiescollisionless shockenergy dissipation
spellingShingle Lynn B. Wilson
Li-Jen Chen
Vadim Roytershteyn
The Discrepancy Between Simulation and Observation of Electric Fields in Collisionless Shocks
Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
PIC simulation
electric field measurement
kinetic instabilities
collisionless shock
energy dissipation
title The Discrepancy Between Simulation and Observation of Electric Fields in Collisionless Shocks
title_full The Discrepancy Between Simulation and Observation of Electric Fields in Collisionless Shocks
title_fullStr The Discrepancy Between Simulation and Observation of Electric Fields in Collisionless Shocks
title_full_unstemmed The Discrepancy Between Simulation and Observation of Electric Fields in Collisionless Shocks
title_short The Discrepancy Between Simulation and Observation of Electric Fields in Collisionless Shocks
title_sort discrepancy between simulation and observation of electric fields in collisionless shocks
topic PIC simulation
electric field measurement
kinetic instabilities
collisionless shock
energy dissipation
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fspas.2020.592634/full
work_keys_str_mv AT lynnbwilson thediscrepancybetweensimulationandobservationofelectricfieldsincollisionlessshocks
AT lijenchen thediscrepancybetweensimulationandobservationofelectricfieldsincollisionlessshocks
AT vadimroytershteyn thediscrepancybetweensimulationandobservationofelectricfieldsincollisionlessshocks
AT lynnbwilson discrepancybetweensimulationandobservationofelectricfieldsincollisionlessshocks
AT lijenchen discrepancybetweensimulationandobservationofelectricfieldsincollisionlessshocks
AT vadimroytershteyn discrepancybetweensimulationandobservationofelectricfieldsincollisionlessshocks