XRCC1 and hOGG1 polymorphisms and endometrial carcinoma: A meta-analysis

Endometrial carcinoma’s (EC) etiology is complex and involves DNA repair gene polymorphisms like XRCC1-Arg399Gln and hOGG1-Ser326Cys, but their association with the disease is unclear. Following PRISMA, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, collecting data from four databases. The stud...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: He Shengke, Zhao Xiujuan, Mu Ruifang, Pan Zhongjun, Mai Jinglan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2024-03-01
Series:Open Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/med-2024-0913
_version_ 1797266162712576000
author He Shengke
Zhao Xiujuan
Mu Ruifang
Pan Zhongjun
Mai Jinglan
author_facet He Shengke
Zhao Xiujuan
Mu Ruifang
Pan Zhongjun
Mai Jinglan
author_sort He Shengke
collection DOAJ
description Endometrial carcinoma’s (EC) etiology is complex and involves DNA repair gene polymorphisms like XRCC1-Arg399Gln and hOGG1-Ser326Cys, but their association with the disease is unclear. Following PRISMA, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, collecting data from four databases. The studies needed to be population-based case–control studies examining the association between the named polymorphisms and EC. Quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated, and subgroup analyses were conducted based on ethnicity. Seven studies were included. Both polymorphisms were found to significantly increase EC risk, particularly in Caucasians. XRCC1-Arg399Gln showed a dominant model OR of 1.14 (95% CI: 1.01–1.29) and a homozygous model OR of 1.59 (95% CI: 1.12–2.25). The heterozygote model OR for hOGG1-Ser326Cys was 1.29 (95% CI: 1.02–1.63), and the allele OR was 1.31 (95% CI: 1.07–1.60). XRCC1-Arg399Gln and hOGG1-Ser326Cys may increase EC risk, primarily in Caucasian women, emphasizing the role of DNA repair in disease susceptibility. More extensive studies are needed to validate these findings in diverse ethnicities and investigate other DNA repair gene polymorphisms.
first_indexed 2024-04-25T00:56:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a5d8e01c70c74a22bf74b26582687e13
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2391-5463
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-25T00:56:19Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher De Gruyter
record_format Article
series Open Medicine
spelling doaj.art-a5d8e01c70c74a22bf74b26582687e132024-03-11T10:04:38ZengDe GruyterOpen Medicine2391-54632024-03-0119114081510.1515/med-2024-0913XRCC1 and hOGG1 polymorphisms and endometrial carcinoma: A meta-analysisHe Shengke0Zhao Xiujuan1Mu Ruifang2Pan Zhongjun3Mai Jinglan4Department of Pathology, Danzhou People’s Hospital, Nada Town, Danzhou, Hainan, 571799, ChinaDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Danzhou People’s Hospital, Nada Town, Danzhou, Hainan, 571799, ChinaDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Danzhou People’s Hospital, Nada Town, Danzhou, Hainan, 571799, ChinaDepartment of Pathology, Danzhou People’s Hospital, Nada Town, Danzhou, Hainan, 571799, ChinaOccupational Physical Examination Outpatient, Haikou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, No. 56 Yehai Avenue, Qiongshan District, Haikou, Hainan, 570203, ChinaEndometrial carcinoma’s (EC) etiology is complex and involves DNA repair gene polymorphisms like XRCC1-Arg399Gln and hOGG1-Ser326Cys, but their association with the disease is unclear. Following PRISMA, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, collecting data from four databases. The studies needed to be population-based case–control studies examining the association between the named polymorphisms and EC. Quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated, and subgroup analyses were conducted based on ethnicity. Seven studies were included. Both polymorphisms were found to significantly increase EC risk, particularly in Caucasians. XRCC1-Arg399Gln showed a dominant model OR of 1.14 (95% CI: 1.01–1.29) and a homozygous model OR of 1.59 (95% CI: 1.12–2.25). The heterozygote model OR for hOGG1-Ser326Cys was 1.29 (95% CI: 1.02–1.63), and the allele OR was 1.31 (95% CI: 1.07–1.60). XRCC1-Arg399Gln and hOGG1-Ser326Cys may increase EC risk, primarily in Caucasian women, emphasizing the role of DNA repair in disease susceptibility. More extensive studies are needed to validate these findings in diverse ethnicities and investigate other DNA repair gene polymorphisms.https://doi.org/10.1515/med-2024-0913xrcc1-arg399glnhogg1-ser326cysendometrial carcinomapolymorphismmeta-analysisgenetic susceptibility
spellingShingle He Shengke
Zhao Xiujuan
Mu Ruifang
Pan Zhongjun
Mai Jinglan
XRCC1 and hOGG1 polymorphisms and endometrial carcinoma: A meta-analysis
Open Medicine
xrcc1-arg399gln
hogg1-ser326cys
endometrial carcinoma
polymorphism
meta-analysis
genetic susceptibility
title XRCC1 and hOGG1 polymorphisms and endometrial carcinoma: A meta-analysis
title_full XRCC1 and hOGG1 polymorphisms and endometrial carcinoma: A meta-analysis
title_fullStr XRCC1 and hOGG1 polymorphisms and endometrial carcinoma: A meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed XRCC1 and hOGG1 polymorphisms and endometrial carcinoma: A meta-analysis
title_short XRCC1 and hOGG1 polymorphisms and endometrial carcinoma: A meta-analysis
title_sort xrcc1 and hogg1 polymorphisms and endometrial carcinoma a meta analysis
topic xrcc1-arg399gln
hogg1-ser326cys
endometrial carcinoma
polymorphism
meta-analysis
genetic susceptibility
url https://doi.org/10.1515/med-2024-0913
work_keys_str_mv AT heshengke xrcc1andhogg1polymorphismsandendometrialcarcinomaametaanalysis
AT zhaoxiujuan xrcc1andhogg1polymorphismsandendometrialcarcinomaametaanalysis
AT muruifang xrcc1andhogg1polymorphismsandendometrialcarcinomaametaanalysis
AT panzhongjun xrcc1andhogg1polymorphismsandendometrialcarcinomaametaanalysis
AT maijinglan xrcc1andhogg1polymorphismsandendometrialcarcinomaametaanalysis