COSMIC EVIDENCE AND NATURAL-SCIENCE THEORIES
Aspiration for discovering one necessary creature, who establishes visible and changeable cosmos, has existed in the early period of philosophical thinking. In philosophical tradition the most acknowledged way of determining existence of such creature starts form empirical givenness of this worl...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
University of Mostar, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
2008-01-01
|
| Series: | Hum |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hum.ff.sum.ba/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Humdec2008_189_209.pdf |
| _version_ | 1827281033046786048 |
|---|---|
| author | Mate Buntić |
| author_facet | Mate Buntić |
| author_sort | Mate Buntić |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Aspiration for discovering one necessary creature, who establishes visible
and changeable cosmos, has existed in the early period of philosophical
thinking. In philosophical tradition the most acknowledged way of determining
existence of such creature starts form empirical givenness of
this world which testifies about its imperfectness, instability, decadence,
changeability, unnecessity (contingent). Hence it can be concluded that
there exists one, necessary, perfect and infinite creature. On the example
of T. Akvinski’s five ways the author gives the structure and content of
cosmic evidence for God’s existence. In the end of each starting point it
can be concluded that there exists either the First immovable initiator
or the First cause or Necessary creature or according to Akvinski, God.
The author also gives results of researching some natural-science theories
comparing their ranges with the conclusions of cosmic evidence. The conclusion
of that comparison is that the most known contemporary theories
more confirm than deny ranges of cosmic evidence, firstly because they
also show that world is contingent, finite, changeable, but based on legalities
which have their justification in necessary, perfect and above all
intelligent creature. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-24T08:52:25Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-a5db85495c2a40d3aa5a9a40f7379c60 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1840-233X 2303-7431 |
| language | deu |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-24T08:52:25Z |
| publishDate | 2008-01-01 |
| publisher | University of Mostar, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Hum |
| spelling | doaj.art-a5db85495c2a40d3aa5a9a40f7379c602024-04-16T10:08:36ZdeuUniversity of Mostar, Faculty of Humanities and Social SciencesHum1840-233X2303-74312008-01-014189209COSMIC EVIDENCE AND NATURAL-SCIENCE THEORIESMate Buntić0Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of MostarAspiration for discovering one necessary creature, who establishes visible and changeable cosmos, has existed in the early period of philosophical thinking. In philosophical tradition the most acknowledged way of determining existence of such creature starts form empirical givenness of this world which testifies about its imperfectness, instability, decadence, changeability, unnecessity (contingent). Hence it can be concluded that there exists one, necessary, perfect and infinite creature. On the example of T. Akvinski’s five ways the author gives the structure and content of cosmic evidence for God’s existence. In the end of each starting point it can be concluded that there exists either the First immovable initiator or the First cause or Necessary creature or according to Akvinski, God. The author also gives results of researching some natural-science theories comparing their ranges with the conclusions of cosmic evidence. The conclusion of that comparison is that the most known contemporary theories more confirm than deny ranges of cosmic evidence, firstly because they also show that world is contingent, finite, changeable, but based on legalities which have their justification in necessary, perfect and above all intelligent creature.https://hum.ff.sum.ba/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Humdec2008_189_209.pdfevidencecosmosnecessarycontingentcausalitygod |
| spellingShingle | Mate Buntić COSMIC EVIDENCE AND NATURAL-SCIENCE THEORIES Hum evidence cosmos necessary contingent causality god |
| title | COSMIC EVIDENCE AND
NATURAL-SCIENCE THEORIES |
| title_full | COSMIC EVIDENCE AND
NATURAL-SCIENCE THEORIES |
| title_fullStr | COSMIC EVIDENCE AND
NATURAL-SCIENCE THEORIES |
| title_full_unstemmed | COSMIC EVIDENCE AND
NATURAL-SCIENCE THEORIES |
| title_short | COSMIC EVIDENCE AND
NATURAL-SCIENCE THEORIES |
| title_sort | cosmic evidence and natural science theories |
| topic | evidence cosmos necessary contingent causality god |
| url | https://hum.ff.sum.ba/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Humdec2008_189_209.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT matebuntic cosmicevidenceandnaturalsciencetheories |