Current practical experience with artificial intelligence in clinical radiology: a survey of the European Society of Radiology

Abstract A survey among the members of European Society of Radiology (ESR) was conducted regarding the current practical clinical experience of radiologists with Artificial Intelligence (AI)-powered tools. 690 radiologists completed the survey. Among these were 276 radiologists from 229 institutions...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: European Society of Radiology (ESR)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2022-06-01
Series:Insights into Imaging
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01247-y
_version_ 1811227295421038592
author European Society of Radiology (ESR)
author_facet European Society of Radiology (ESR)
author_sort European Society of Radiology (ESR)
collection DOAJ
description Abstract A survey among the members of European Society of Radiology (ESR) was conducted regarding the current practical clinical experience of radiologists with Artificial Intelligence (AI)-powered tools. 690 radiologists completed the survey. Among these were 276 radiologists from 229 institutions in 32 countries who had practical clinical experience with an AI-based algorithm and formed the basis of this study. The respondents with clinical AI experience included 143 radiologists (52%) from academic institutions, 102 radiologists (37%) from regional hospitals, and 31 radiologists (11%) from private practice. The use case scenarios of the AI algorithm were mainly related to diagnostic interpretation, image post-processing, and prioritisation of workflow. Technical difficulties with integration of AI-based tools into the workflow were experienced by only 49 respondents (17.8%). Of 185 radiologists who used AI-based algorithms for diagnostic purposes, 140 (75.7%) considered the results of the algorithms generally reliable. The use of a diagnostic algorithm was mentioned in the report by 64 respondents (34.6%) and disclosed to patients by 32 (17.3%). Only 42 (22.7%) experienced a significant reduction of their workload, whereas 129 (69.8%) found that there was no such effect. Of 111 respondents who used AI-based algorithms for clinical workflow prioritisation, 26 (23.4%) considered algorithms to be very helpful for reducing the workload of the medical staff whereas the others found them only moderately helpful (62.2%) or not helpful at all (14.4%). Only 92 (13.3%) of the total 690 respondents indicated that they had intentions to acquire AI tools. In summary, although the assistance of AI algorithms was found to be reliable for different use case scenarios, the majority of radiologists experienced no reduction of practical clinical workload.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T09:39:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a5eeb0c72fcf4ac19bbdf88b86b6ba4c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1869-4101
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T09:39:06Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Insights into Imaging
spelling doaj.art-a5eeb0c72fcf4ac19bbdf88b86b6ba4c2022-12-22T03:38:08ZengSpringerOpenInsights into Imaging1869-41012022-06-011311910.1186/s13244-022-01247-yCurrent practical experience with artificial intelligence in clinical radiology: a survey of the European Society of RadiologyEuropean Society of Radiology (ESR)0European Society of Radiology (ESR)Abstract A survey among the members of European Society of Radiology (ESR) was conducted regarding the current practical clinical experience of radiologists with Artificial Intelligence (AI)-powered tools. 690 radiologists completed the survey. Among these were 276 radiologists from 229 institutions in 32 countries who had practical clinical experience with an AI-based algorithm and formed the basis of this study. The respondents with clinical AI experience included 143 radiologists (52%) from academic institutions, 102 radiologists (37%) from regional hospitals, and 31 radiologists (11%) from private practice. The use case scenarios of the AI algorithm were mainly related to diagnostic interpretation, image post-processing, and prioritisation of workflow. Technical difficulties with integration of AI-based tools into the workflow were experienced by only 49 respondents (17.8%). Of 185 radiologists who used AI-based algorithms for diagnostic purposes, 140 (75.7%) considered the results of the algorithms generally reliable. The use of a diagnostic algorithm was mentioned in the report by 64 respondents (34.6%) and disclosed to patients by 32 (17.3%). Only 42 (22.7%) experienced a significant reduction of their workload, whereas 129 (69.8%) found that there was no such effect. Of 111 respondents who used AI-based algorithms for clinical workflow prioritisation, 26 (23.4%) considered algorithms to be very helpful for reducing the workload of the medical staff whereas the others found them only moderately helpful (62.2%) or not helpful at all (14.4%). Only 92 (13.3%) of the total 690 respondents indicated that they had intentions to acquire AI tools. In summary, although the assistance of AI algorithms was found to be reliable for different use case scenarios, the majority of radiologists experienced no reduction of practical clinical workload.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01247-yProfessional issuesArtificial intelligence in imagingArtificial intelligence and workloadArtificial intelligence in radiology
spellingShingle European Society of Radiology (ESR)
Current practical experience with artificial intelligence in clinical radiology: a survey of the European Society of Radiology
Insights into Imaging
Professional issues
Artificial intelligence in imaging
Artificial intelligence and workload
Artificial intelligence in radiology
title Current practical experience with artificial intelligence in clinical radiology: a survey of the European Society of Radiology
title_full Current practical experience with artificial intelligence in clinical radiology: a survey of the European Society of Radiology
title_fullStr Current practical experience with artificial intelligence in clinical radiology: a survey of the European Society of Radiology
title_full_unstemmed Current practical experience with artificial intelligence in clinical radiology: a survey of the European Society of Radiology
title_short Current practical experience with artificial intelligence in clinical radiology: a survey of the European Society of Radiology
title_sort current practical experience with artificial intelligence in clinical radiology a survey of the european society of radiology
topic Professional issues
Artificial intelligence in imaging
Artificial intelligence and workload
Artificial intelligence in radiology
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01247-y
work_keys_str_mv AT europeansocietyofradiologyesr currentpracticalexperiencewithartificialintelligenceinclinicalradiologyasurveyoftheeuropeansocietyofradiology