Fenton-13 vs. Intergrowth-21 Standards for the Assessment of Intrauterine and Postnatal Growth Restriction in Very Low Birth Weight Infants

Objective: We aimed to compare the incidence of small for gestational age (SGA) and postnatal growth failure (PGF) of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants according to Fenton-13 and Intergrowth-21 curves. Methods: The records of babies with a birth weight of <1500 g were reviewed retrospecti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Buse ÖZER BEKMEZ, Mehmet BÜYÜKTİRYAKİ
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Galenos Yayinevi 2023-07-01
Series:Forbes Tıp Dergisi
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jag.journalagent.com/z4/download_fulltext.asp?pdir=forbes&un=FJM-02411
_version_ 1797767545631014912
author Buse ÖZER BEKMEZ
Mehmet BÜYÜKTİRYAKİ
author_facet Buse ÖZER BEKMEZ
Mehmet BÜYÜKTİRYAKİ
author_sort Buse ÖZER BEKMEZ
collection DOAJ
description Objective: We aimed to compare the incidence of small for gestational age (SGA) and postnatal growth failure (PGF) of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants according to Fenton-13 and Intergrowth-21 curves. Methods: The records of babies with a birth weight of <1500 g were reviewed retrospectively. The percentile and z-scores for the babies' body weight and head circumference at birth and discharge were calculated using the web-based calculators developed by the Fenton-13 and Intergrowth-21 consortium. While SGA was defined as birth weight below the 10th percentile, body weight of <10th percentile for adjusted postmenstrual age at discharge was named as PGF. Infants who died, had major chromosomal/ congenital anomalies, and were diagnosed with perinatal asphyxia were excluded from the study. Results: Data of 651 babies with VLBW were analyzed. The incidence of SGA was found to be significantly higher according to Intergrowth-21 than Fenton-13 (9.8% vs 4.3%, p<0.001). However, the frequency of PGF was noted as similar in those charts (60.5-60.7%, p>0.05). However, body weight z-score/percentile and head circumference z score/percentile at discharge were significantly lower in Fenton-13 compared to Intergrowth-21 charts. Conclusion: In our study, while the incidence of SGA was higher based on the Intergrowth-21 charts, no difference was found between the two methods in terms of PGF. Accurate detection of intrauterine and postnatal growth restriction in VLBW infants enables the precise determination of the risk of short- and long-term adverse outcomes in this vulnerable population.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T20:41:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a5f32ebf8f5c441c8079e76d514076d9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2757-5241
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T20:41:24Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher Galenos Yayinevi
record_format Article
series Forbes Tıp Dergisi
spelling doaj.art-a5f32ebf8f5c441c8079e76d514076d92023-08-01T10:46:03ZengGalenos YayineviForbes Tıp Dergisi2757-52412023-07-014220521010.4274/forbes.galenos.2023.02411FJM-02411Fenton-13 vs. Intergrowth-21 Standards for the Assessment of Intrauterine and Postnatal Growth Restriction in Very Low Birth Weight InfantsBuse ÖZER BEKMEZ0Mehmet BÜYÜKTİRYAKİ1Hamidiye Etfal Education and Research Hospital, Division of Neonatology, IstanbulIstanbul Medipol University, Division of Neonatology, IstanbulObjective: We aimed to compare the incidence of small for gestational age (SGA) and postnatal growth failure (PGF) of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants according to Fenton-13 and Intergrowth-21 curves. Methods: The records of babies with a birth weight of <1500 g were reviewed retrospectively. The percentile and z-scores for the babies' body weight and head circumference at birth and discharge were calculated using the web-based calculators developed by the Fenton-13 and Intergrowth-21 consortium. While SGA was defined as birth weight below the 10th percentile, body weight of <10th percentile for adjusted postmenstrual age at discharge was named as PGF. Infants who died, had major chromosomal/ congenital anomalies, and were diagnosed with perinatal asphyxia were excluded from the study. Results: Data of 651 babies with VLBW were analyzed. The incidence of SGA was found to be significantly higher according to Intergrowth-21 than Fenton-13 (9.8% vs 4.3%, p<0.001). However, the frequency of PGF was noted as similar in those charts (60.5-60.7%, p>0.05). However, body weight z-score/percentile and head circumference z score/percentile at discharge were significantly lower in Fenton-13 compared to Intergrowth-21 charts. Conclusion: In our study, while the incidence of SGA was higher based on the Intergrowth-21 charts, no difference was found between the two methods in terms of PGF. Accurate detection of intrauterine and postnatal growth restriction in VLBW infants enables the precise determination of the risk of short- and long-term adverse outcomes in this vulnerable population.https://jag.journalagent.com/z4/download_fulltext.asp?pdir=forbes&un=FJM-02411prematuritygrowth assessmentfenton-13intergrowth-21postnatal growth failure
spellingShingle Buse ÖZER BEKMEZ
Mehmet BÜYÜKTİRYAKİ
Fenton-13 vs. Intergrowth-21 Standards for the Assessment of Intrauterine and Postnatal Growth Restriction in Very Low Birth Weight Infants
Forbes Tıp Dergisi
prematurity
growth assessment
fenton-13
intergrowth-21
postnatal growth failure
title Fenton-13 vs. Intergrowth-21 Standards for the Assessment of Intrauterine and Postnatal Growth Restriction in Very Low Birth Weight Infants
title_full Fenton-13 vs. Intergrowth-21 Standards for the Assessment of Intrauterine and Postnatal Growth Restriction in Very Low Birth Weight Infants
title_fullStr Fenton-13 vs. Intergrowth-21 Standards for the Assessment of Intrauterine and Postnatal Growth Restriction in Very Low Birth Weight Infants
title_full_unstemmed Fenton-13 vs. Intergrowth-21 Standards for the Assessment of Intrauterine and Postnatal Growth Restriction in Very Low Birth Weight Infants
title_short Fenton-13 vs. Intergrowth-21 Standards for the Assessment of Intrauterine and Postnatal Growth Restriction in Very Low Birth Weight Infants
title_sort fenton 13 vs intergrowth 21 standards for the assessment of intrauterine and postnatal growth restriction in very low birth weight infants
topic prematurity
growth assessment
fenton-13
intergrowth-21
postnatal growth failure
url https://jag.journalagent.com/z4/download_fulltext.asp?pdir=forbes&un=FJM-02411
work_keys_str_mv AT buseozerbekmez fenton13vsintergrowth21standardsfortheassessmentofintrauterineandpostnatalgrowthrestrictioninverylowbirthweightinfants
AT mehmetbuyuktiryaki fenton13vsintergrowth21standardsfortheassessmentofintrauterineandpostnatalgrowthrestrictioninverylowbirthweightinfants