Carpal tunnel syndrome: evaluation of its provocative clinical tests
Abstract Background The diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is established mainly on a clinical basis, and diagnosis is done after careful history taking and examination including known provocative tests with varying efficacy and reliability. Methods A prospective clinical study of 123 patient...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2018-08-01
|
Series: | Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41984-018-0014-7 |
_version_ | 1818543502624030720 |
---|---|
author | Ahmed A. Arab Mohamed M. Elmaghrabi Mohamed H. Eltantawy |
author_facet | Ahmed A. Arab Mohamed M. Elmaghrabi Mohamed H. Eltantawy |
author_sort | Ahmed A. Arab |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background The diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is established mainly on a clinical basis, and diagnosis is done after careful history taking and examination including known provocative tests with varying efficacy and reliability. Methods A prospective clinical study of 123 patients with 171 hands presenting with classical symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome were included in this study, from October 2013 to October 2015, and they underwent open surgical release of flexor retinaculum at the Neurosurgery Department of Benha University Hospital. Results ART is positive in 88.3%. This is compared to 75, 81.3, 79.7, and 83.6% of positive results in Tinel’s test, compression test, Phalen’s test, and combined Phalen’s and compression test. ART is the most sensitive and specific test and has the highest positive predictive value of 98.3%, negative predictive value of 81.9%, and accuracy of 91.4%. Conclusion ART is a simple, reliable, and easily performed test for evaluating carpal tunnel syndrome; it is superior to other tests and could be used also to assess improvement after surgery. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-11T22:36:14Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-a5f345a287fc43318cda863db49936f3 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2520-8225 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-11T22:36:14Z |
publishDate | 2018-08-01 |
publisher | SpringerOpen |
record_format | Article |
series | Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery |
spelling | doaj.art-a5f345a287fc43318cda863db49936f32022-12-22T00:47:57ZengSpringerOpenEgyptian Journal of Neurosurgery2520-82252018-08-013311410.1186/s41984-018-0014-7Carpal tunnel syndrome: evaluation of its provocative clinical testsAhmed A. Arab0Mohamed M. Elmaghrabi1Mohamed H. Eltantawy2Department of Neurosurgery, Benha UniversityDepartment of Neurosurgery, Benha UniversityDepartment of Neurosurgery, Benha UniversityAbstract Background The diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is established mainly on a clinical basis, and diagnosis is done after careful history taking and examination including known provocative tests with varying efficacy and reliability. Methods A prospective clinical study of 123 patients with 171 hands presenting with classical symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome were included in this study, from October 2013 to October 2015, and they underwent open surgical release of flexor retinaculum at the Neurosurgery Department of Benha University Hospital. Results ART is positive in 88.3%. This is compared to 75, 81.3, 79.7, and 83.6% of positive results in Tinel’s test, compression test, Phalen’s test, and combined Phalen’s and compression test. ART is the most sensitive and specific test and has the highest positive predictive value of 98.3%, negative predictive value of 81.9%, and accuracy of 91.4%. Conclusion ART is a simple, reliable, and easily performed test for evaluating carpal tunnel syndrome; it is superior to other tests and could be used also to assess improvement after surgery.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41984-018-0014-7Carpal tunnel syndromeArm raising testProvocative tests |
spellingShingle | Ahmed A. Arab Mohamed M. Elmaghrabi Mohamed H. Eltantawy Carpal tunnel syndrome: evaluation of its provocative clinical tests Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery Carpal tunnel syndrome Arm raising test Provocative tests |
title | Carpal tunnel syndrome: evaluation of its provocative clinical tests |
title_full | Carpal tunnel syndrome: evaluation of its provocative clinical tests |
title_fullStr | Carpal tunnel syndrome: evaluation of its provocative clinical tests |
title_full_unstemmed | Carpal tunnel syndrome: evaluation of its provocative clinical tests |
title_short | Carpal tunnel syndrome: evaluation of its provocative clinical tests |
title_sort | carpal tunnel syndrome evaluation of its provocative clinical tests |
topic | Carpal tunnel syndrome Arm raising test Provocative tests |
url | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41984-018-0014-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ahmedaarab carpaltunnelsyndromeevaluationofitsprovocativeclinicaltests AT mohamedmelmaghrabi carpaltunnelsyndromeevaluationofitsprovocativeclinicaltests AT mohamedheltantawy carpaltunnelsyndromeevaluationofitsprovocativeclinicaltests |