Maxillary control with functional appliances: some clinical observations
Accepting that the activator appliance can be used successfully to correct the occlusion by modifying the relationship of the dentitions and modifying growth characteristics of maxilla and mandible, what are the limitations of the appliance in the treatment of Class II division I cases? How can we o...
Main Author: | Heath John R. |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sciendo
1985-10-01
|
Series: | Australasian Orthodontic Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2478/aoj-1985-0010 |
Similar Items
-
The Effects Of Actıvator And Actıvator + Anterıor Hıgh-Pull Headgear On The Growth Dırectıon Of Class 2 Cases
by: Oktay Üner, et al.
Published: (1989-04-01) -
Functional appliances: Which one, When? Part 1 — Rationale for selection
by: Roberts Graeme L.
Published: (1985-03-01) -
En Masse Retractıon Of Maxıllary Anterıor Teeth Wıth “Anterıor Headgear
by: Enis Güray, et al.
Published: (1995-04-01) -
Gummy Smile Improvement during Growth Period Using a Simple Bite Jumping Appliance and High-Pull J-Hook HeadGear: A Case Series Study
by: Takuma Sato, et al.
Published: (2022-11-01) -
The Effects Of The Combınatıon Of Maxıllary Splınt And Hıgh-Pull Headgear On Dentofacıal System
by: Hüseyin Ölmez, et al.
Published: (1994-11-01)