The EU's response vs. Chinese vaccine diplomacy in Central and Eastern Europe

This paper analyses the initial critical points of the EU's weakness in quickly responding to the crisis and the Chinese assertiveness in using vaccine diplomacy to achieve European political objectives. With the case study based on indicative research on public opinion, the paper provides a mo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Goran ILIK, Vesna SHAPKOSKI
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi 2022-12-01
Series:Eastern Journal of European Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ejes.uaic.ro/articles/EJES2022_1302_ILI.pdf
_version_ 1797942768226533376
author Goran ILIK
Vesna SHAPKOSKI
author_facet Goran ILIK
Vesna SHAPKOSKI
author_sort Goran ILIK
collection DOAJ
description This paper analyses the initial critical points of the EU's weakness in quickly responding to the crisis and the Chinese assertiveness in using vaccine diplomacy to achieve European political objectives. With the case study based on indicative research on public opinion, the paper provides a more profound understanding of the impact of Chinese-related activities in the CEE region, particularly concerning EU coherence and solidarity. The paper concludes that the Chinese presence in Europe via "vaccine diplomacy" threatens the unity of the EU and the CEE region.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T20:12:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a60a302f23214801b13634b033e82b57
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2068-651X
2068-6633
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T20:12:37Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi
record_format Article
series Eastern Journal of European Studies
spelling doaj.art-a60a302f23214801b13634b033e82b572023-01-26T09:06:08ZengAlexandru Ioan Cuza University of IasiEastern Journal of European Studies2068-651X2068-66332022-12-011329911510.47743/ejes-2022-0205The EU's response vs. Chinese vaccine diplomacy in Central and Eastern EuropeGoran ILIK0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3501-1386Vesna SHAPKOSKI1University St. Kliment Ohridski in Bitola, North MacedoniaUniversity St. Kliment Ohridski in Bitola, North MacedoniaThis paper analyses the initial critical points of the EU's weakness in quickly responding to the crisis and the Chinese assertiveness in using vaccine diplomacy to achieve European political objectives. With the case study based on indicative research on public opinion, the paper provides a more profound understanding of the impact of Chinese-related activities in the CEE region, particularly concerning EU coherence and solidarity. The paper concludes that the Chinese presence in Europe via "vaccine diplomacy" threatens the unity of the EU and the CEE region. https://ejes.uaic.ro/articles/EJES2022_1302_ILI.pdfpandemicstrategyvaccinepowerchinaeu
spellingShingle Goran ILIK
Vesna SHAPKOSKI
The EU's response vs. Chinese vaccine diplomacy in Central and Eastern Europe
Eastern Journal of European Studies
pandemic
strategy
vaccine
power
china
eu
title The EU's response vs. Chinese vaccine diplomacy in Central and Eastern Europe
title_full The EU's response vs. Chinese vaccine diplomacy in Central and Eastern Europe
title_fullStr The EU's response vs. Chinese vaccine diplomacy in Central and Eastern Europe
title_full_unstemmed The EU's response vs. Chinese vaccine diplomacy in Central and Eastern Europe
title_short The EU's response vs. Chinese vaccine diplomacy in Central and Eastern Europe
title_sort eu s response vs chinese vaccine diplomacy in central and eastern europe
topic pandemic
strategy
vaccine
power
china
eu
url https://ejes.uaic.ro/articles/EJES2022_1302_ILI.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT goranilik theeusresponsevschinesevaccinediplomacyincentralandeasterneurope
AT vesnashapkoski theeusresponsevschinesevaccinediplomacyincentralandeasterneurope
AT goranilik eusresponsevschinesevaccinediplomacyincentralandeasterneurope
AT vesnashapkoski eusresponsevschinesevaccinediplomacyincentralandeasterneurope