CLINICAL EXPERIENCE WITH DIFFERENT DRUGS FOR BOWEL PREPARATION
Bowel preparation remains an important issue despite vast clinical experience in this field.Methods. 530 patients were included in retrospective analysis. 234 (44.2 %) patients in group 1 used sodium phosphate (SP) for bowel preparation, 176 (33.2 %) patients in group 2 used polyethylene glycol (PEG...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Russian |
| Published: |
“ABV-press” Publishing house”, LLC
2015-02-01
|
| Series: | Тазовая хирургия и онкология |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ok.abvpress.ru/jour/article/view/92 |
| _version_ | 1797759271201406976 |
|---|---|
| author | S. G. Tereshchenko E. V. Velikanov E. M. Lukina A. A. Titaeva L. V. Mechеva |
| author_facet | S. G. Tereshchenko E. V. Velikanov E. M. Lukina A. A. Titaeva L. V. Mechеva |
| author_sort | S. G. Tereshchenko |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Bowel preparation remains an important issue despite vast clinical experience in this field.Methods. 530 patients were included in retrospective analysis. 234 (44.2 %) patients in group 1 used sodium phosphate (SP) for bowel preparation, 176 (33.2 %) patients in group 2 used polyethylene glycol (PEG), 120 (22.6 %) patients used castor oil. Quality of bowel preparation was assessed according to following grading system: «good», «acceptable», «bad».Results. «Good», «acceptable», «bad» bowel preparation was observed in following number of patients: 160 (68.4 %), 46 (19.7 %) and 28 (12 %) patients who used SP, 38.6, 40.3 and 20.1 % who used PEG and 43.3, 20.8, 35.8 % who used castor oil. Results of «good» preparation were significantly better in patients who used SP comparing to other treatment groups.Conclusions. Better bowel preparation with SP was observed in our study, though results need to be validated in randomized trials. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T18:42:01Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-a614fc29ce3a4635a7ada23eb5c4aeb3 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2686-9594 |
| language | Russian |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T18:42:01Z |
| publishDate | 2015-02-01 |
| publisher | “ABV-press” Publishing house”, LLC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Тазовая хирургия и онкология |
| spelling | doaj.art-a614fc29ce3a4635a7ada23eb5c4aeb32023-08-02T07:48:57Zrus“ABV-press” Publishing house”, LLCТазовая хирургия и онкология2686-95942015-02-0103566210.17650/2220-3478-2013-0-3-56-6286CLINICAL EXPERIENCE WITH DIFFERENT DRUGS FOR BOWEL PREPARATIONS. G. Tereshchenko0E. V. Velikanov1E. M. Lukina2A. A. Titaeva3L. V. Mechеva4M.F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical InstituteM.F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical InstituteM.F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical InstituteM.F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical InstituteM.F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical InstituteBowel preparation remains an important issue despite vast clinical experience in this field.Methods. 530 patients were included in retrospective analysis. 234 (44.2 %) patients in group 1 used sodium phosphate (SP) for bowel preparation, 176 (33.2 %) patients in group 2 used polyethylene glycol (PEG), 120 (22.6 %) patients used castor oil. Quality of bowel preparation was assessed according to following grading system: «good», «acceptable», «bad».Results. «Good», «acceptable», «bad» bowel preparation was observed in following number of patients: 160 (68.4 %), 46 (19.7 %) and 28 (12 %) patients who used SP, 38.6, 40.3 and 20.1 % who used PEG and 43.3, 20.8, 35.8 % who used castor oil. Results of «good» preparation were significantly better in patients who used SP comparing to other treatment groups.Conclusions. Better bowel preparation with SP was observed in our study, though results need to be validated in randomized trials.https://ok.abvpress.ru/jour/article/view/92colonoscopybowel preparation |
| spellingShingle | S. G. Tereshchenko E. V. Velikanov E. M. Lukina A. A. Titaeva L. V. Mechеva CLINICAL EXPERIENCE WITH DIFFERENT DRUGS FOR BOWEL PREPARATION Тазовая хирургия и онкология colonoscopy bowel preparation |
| title | CLINICAL EXPERIENCE WITH DIFFERENT DRUGS FOR BOWEL PREPARATION |
| title_full | CLINICAL EXPERIENCE WITH DIFFERENT DRUGS FOR BOWEL PREPARATION |
| title_fullStr | CLINICAL EXPERIENCE WITH DIFFERENT DRUGS FOR BOWEL PREPARATION |
| title_full_unstemmed | CLINICAL EXPERIENCE WITH DIFFERENT DRUGS FOR BOWEL PREPARATION |
| title_short | CLINICAL EXPERIENCE WITH DIFFERENT DRUGS FOR BOWEL PREPARATION |
| title_sort | clinical experience with different drugs for bowel preparation |
| topic | colonoscopy bowel preparation |
| url | https://ok.abvpress.ru/jour/article/view/92 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sgtereshchenko clinicalexperiencewithdifferentdrugsforbowelpreparation AT evvelikanov clinicalexperiencewithdifferentdrugsforbowelpreparation AT emlukina clinicalexperiencewithdifferentdrugsforbowelpreparation AT aatitaeva clinicalexperiencewithdifferentdrugsforbowelpreparation AT lvmecheva clinicalexperiencewithdifferentdrugsforbowelpreparation |