Intraoperative Frozen Section Analysis and an Audit of its Diagnostic Accuracy: A Cross-sectional Study from Maharashtra, India

Introduction: Frozen Section (FS) is a diagnostic technique performed intraoperatively to obtain relevant information about the primary diagnosis, margin status, or sentinel lymph nodes, which helps guide the course of surgery. With the prevalent use of FS, it is imperative to recognise and scrutini...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Priyanka Gokul Ingole, Nandini Agrawal, Sadhana Harshvardhan Khaparde, Ninad Jayant Gadekar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited 2024-02-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.jcdr.net/articles/PDF/19026/66867_CE[Ra1]_F(SHU)_QC(KK_VI_IS)_PF1(RI_SHU)_PFA_NC(RI_KM)_PN(KM).pdf
_version_ 1797324143857762304
author Priyanka Gokul Ingole
Nandini Agrawal
Sadhana Harshvardhan Khaparde
Ninad Jayant Gadekar
author_facet Priyanka Gokul Ingole
Nandini Agrawal
Sadhana Harshvardhan Khaparde
Ninad Jayant Gadekar
author_sort Priyanka Gokul Ingole
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Frozen Section (FS) is a diagnostic technique performed intraoperatively to obtain relevant information about the primary diagnosis, margin status, or sentinel lymph nodes, which helps guide the course of surgery. With the prevalent use of FS, it is imperative to recognise and scrutinise its diagnostic pitfalls and make efforts for rectification. Aim: To compare diagnostic results obtained on FS with final paraffin-embedded histopathology and calculate the Diagnostic Accuracy (DA) of FS. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Pathology at a tertiary care hospital, DVVPFs Medical College in Ahmednagar district, Maharashtra, India over a period of two years from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2021. The diagnosis provided on specimens received for intraoperative FS was compared with the final histopathological diagnosis, considered as the gold standard for the same specimen. The results were categorised as concordant, discordant, and deferred cases. The diagnosis on FS and the final histopathological diagnosis, along with relevant clinical data, were entered into an excel sheet. Further, the DA of FS was calculated. All the discordant cases were analysed. Statistical analysis utilised simple percentage calculations from the excel sheet. Results: A total of 130 cases were analysed using FS, with the most common indication being sentinel lymph node analysis to detect metastatic deposits in 72 (55.4%) cases. Out of the total 130 cases, 119 (91.5%) were concordant, 10 (7.7%) were discordant, and 1 (0.8%) was deferred due to an insufficient specimen. Therefore, the overall DA rate was found to be 91.5% with an error rate of 8.5%. Upon analysis of the 10 discordant cases, the cause of inaccuracy was technical error in 7 (70%) cases and interpretation error in 3 (30%) cases. Conclusion: The DA obtained in the present study was somewhat lower than expected due to technical errors during FS sectioning, leading to artifacts, especially during lymph node processing. Analysis of the discordant cases unveiled this deficit. Therefore, such assessment studies should be performed periodically as they assist in highlighting the shortfalls and provide a plan to boost DA.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T05:45:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a6193974c7624a40ae9398cf6660774c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2249-782X
0973-709X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T05:45:56Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
spelling doaj.art-a6193974c7624a40ae9398cf6660774c2024-02-05T10:16:44ZengJCDR Research and Publications Private LimitedJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research2249-782X0973-709X2024-02-011802121610.7860/JCDR/2024/66867.19026Intraoperative Frozen Section Analysis and an Audit of its Diagnostic Accuracy: A Cross-sectional Study from Maharashtra, IndiaPriyanka Gokul Ingole0Nandini Agrawal1Sadhana Harshvardhan Khaparde2Ninad Jayant Gadekar3Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, DVVPFs Medical College, Ahmednagar, Maharashtra, India.Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, DVVPFs Medical College, Ahmednagar, Maharashtra, India.Professor, Department of Pathology, DVVPFs Medical College, Ahmednagar, Maharashtra, India.Professor, Department of Surgery, DVVPFs Medical College, Ahmednagar, Maharashtra, India.Introduction: Frozen Section (FS) is a diagnostic technique performed intraoperatively to obtain relevant information about the primary diagnosis, margin status, or sentinel lymph nodes, which helps guide the course of surgery. With the prevalent use of FS, it is imperative to recognise and scrutinise its diagnostic pitfalls and make efforts for rectification. Aim: To compare diagnostic results obtained on FS with final paraffin-embedded histopathology and calculate the Diagnostic Accuracy (DA) of FS. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Pathology at a tertiary care hospital, DVVPFs Medical College in Ahmednagar district, Maharashtra, India over a period of two years from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2021. The diagnosis provided on specimens received for intraoperative FS was compared with the final histopathological diagnosis, considered as the gold standard for the same specimen. The results were categorised as concordant, discordant, and deferred cases. The diagnosis on FS and the final histopathological diagnosis, along with relevant clinical data, were entered into an excel sheet. Further, the DA of FS was calculated. All the discordant cases were analysed. Statistical analysis utilised simple percentage calculations from the excel sheet. Results: A total of 130 cases were analysed using FS, with the most common indication being sentinel lymph node analysis to detect metastatic deposits in 72 (55.4%) cases. Out of the total 130 cases, 119 (91.5%) were concordant, 10 (7.7%) were discordant, and 1 (0.8%) was deferred due to an insufficient specimen. Therefore, the overall DA rate was found to be 91.5% with an error rate of 8.5%. Upon analysis of the 10 discordant cases, the cause of inaccuracy was technical error in 7 (70%) cases and interpretation error in 3 (30%) cases. Conclusion: The DA obtained in the present study was somewhat lower than expected due to technical errors during FS sectioning, leading to artifacts, especially during lymph node processing. Analysis of the discordant cases unveiled this deficit. Therefore, such assessment studies should be performed periodically as they assist in highlighting the shortfalls and provide a plan to boost DA.https://www.jcdr.net/articles/PDF/19026/66867_CE[Ra1]_F(SHU)_QC(KK_VI_IS)_PF1(RI_SHU)_PFA_NC(RI_KM)_PN(KM).pdfdiagnostic techniquediscordantpostoperative histopathology
spellingShingle Priyanka Gokul Ingole
Nandini Agrawal
Sadhana Harshvardhan Khaparde
Ninad Jayant Gadekar
Intraoperative Frozen Section Analysis and an Audit of its Diagnostic Accuracy: A Cross-sectional Study from Maharashtra, India
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
diagnostic technique
discordant
postoperative histopathology
title Intraoperative Frozen Section Analysis and an Audit of its Diagnostic Accuracy: A Cross-sectional Study from Maharashtra, India
title_full Intraoperative Frozen Section Analysis and an Audit of its Diagnostic Accuracy: A Cross-sectional Study from Maharashtra, India
title_fullStr Intraoperative Frozen Section Analysis and an Audit of its Diagnostic Accuracy: A Cross-sectional Study from Maharashtra, India
title_full_unstemmed Intraoperative Frozen Section Analysis and an Audit of its Diagnostic Accuracy: A Cross-sectional Study from Maharashtra, India
title_short Intraoperative Frozen Section Analysis and an Audit of its Diagnostic Accuracy: A Cross-sectional Study from Maharashtra, India
title_sort intraoperative frozen section analysis and an audit of its diagnostic accuracy a cross sectional study from maharashtra india
topic diagnostic technique
discordant
postoperative histopathology
url https://www.jcdr.net/articles/PDF/19026/66867_CE[Ra1]_F(SHU)_QC(KK_VI_IS)_PF1(RI_SHU)_PFA_NC(RI_KM)_PN(KM).pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT priyankagokulingole intraoperativefrozensectionanalysisandanauditofitsdiagnosticaccuracyacrosssectionalstudyfrommaharashtraindia
AT nandiniagrawal intraoperativefrozensectionanalysisandanauditofitsdiagnosticaccuracyacrosssectionalstudyfrommaharashtraindia
AT sadhanaharshvardhankhaparde intraoperativefrozensectionanalysisandanauditofitsdiagnosticaccuracyacrosssectionalstudyfrommaharashtraindia
AT ninadjayantgadekar intraoperativefrozensectionanalysisandanauditofitsdiagnosticaccuracyacrosssectionalstudyfrommaharashtraindia