Variability in Skin Prick Test Results Performed by Multiple Operators Depends on the Device Used

Background The variability of skin prick test results when carried out by multiple users has not previously been assessed across different devices or between different sites on the body. Such multiuser variability has important implications for clinical practice.Objectives We assessed the variabilit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rebecca L. Werther, MBBS, FRACP, Sharon Choo, MBBS, FRACP, FRCPA, Katherine J. Lee, BSc, PhD, Debra Poole, BNurs, Katrina J. Allen, MBBS, BMedSc, FRACP, PhD, Mimi L.K. Tang, MBBS, PhD, FRACP, FRCPA
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2012-01-01
Series:World Allergy Organization Journal
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1939455119304016
_version_ 1818032031898009600
author Rebecca L. Werther, MBBS, FRACP
Sharon Choo, MBBS, FRACP, FRCPA
Katherine J. Lee, BSc, PhD
Debra Poole, BNurs
Katrina J. Allen, MBBS, BMedSc, FRACP, PhD
Mimi L.K. Tang, MBBS, PhD, FRACP, FRCPA
author_facet Rebecca L. Werther, MBBS, FRACP
Sharon Choo, MBBS, FRACP, FRCPA
Katherine J. Lee, BSc, PhD
Debra Poole, BNurs
Katrina J. Allen, MBBS, BMedSc, FRACP, PhD
Mimi L.K. Tang, MBBS, PhD, FRACP, FRCPA
author_sort Rebecca L. Werther, MBBS, FRACP
collection DOAJ
description Background The variability of skin prick test results when carried out by multiple users has not previously been assessed across different devices or between different sites on the body. Such multiuser variability has important implications for clinical practice.Objectives We assessed the variability of measurements from 4 commonly used single-headed skin test devices when used by multiple operators and examined whether the variability in performance was different on the back compared with the forearm.Methods Eight adult volunteer ''operators'' were trained in the use of 4 devices: Greer Pick, Quintip, Stallergenes Lancet, and Feather Lancet. Each operator performed a histamine skin prick test with all devices on the backs and forearms of 5 volunteer ''receivers.'' Variability in results was assessed using a multilevel (random effects) regression model.Results After controlling for variation between users and receivers, the residual variability or ''measurement error'' was least for the Stallergenes Lancet, closely followed by the Quintip. The Greer Pick had the greatest variability. There was greater variability in measurements on the arm compared with the back.Conclusions The devices using the ''puncture'' method (Stallergenes Lancet, Quintip) provide less variability in results than those using a ''prick'' method when carried out by multiple users (Greer Pick and Feather Lancet). Testing on the back also gives less variable results compared with the arm. Keywords: device, skin prick test, variability
first_indexed 2024-12-10T06:00:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a61e98557add4c25a86fb8c01aa791a2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1939-4551
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T06:00:55Z
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series World Allergy Organization Journal
spelling doaj.art-a61e98557add4c25a86fb8c01aa791a22022-12-22T01:59:49ZengElsevierWorld Allergy Organization Journal1939-45512012-01-01512200204Variability in Skin Prick Test Results Performed by Multiple Operators Depends on the Device UsedRebecca L. Werther, MBBS, FRACP0Sharon Choo, MBBS, FRACP, FRCPA1Katherine J. Lee, BSc, PhD2Debra Poole, BNurs3Katrina J. Allen, MBBS, BMedSc, FRACP, PhD4Mimi L.K. Tang, MBBS, PhD, FRACP, FRCPA5Department of Allergy and Immunology, Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia;Department of Allergy and Immunology, Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia;Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia;; Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne,Melbourne, Australia.Department of Allergy and Immunology, Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia;Department of Allergy and Immunology, Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia;; Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia;; Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne,Melbourne, Australia.Department of Allergy and Immunology, Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia;; Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia;; Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne,Melbourne, Australia.; Corresponding author.Background The variability of skin prick test results when carried out by multiple users has not previously been assessed across different devices or between different sites on the body. Such multiuser variability has important implications for clinical practice.Objectives We assessed the variability of measurements from 4 commonly used single-headed skin test devices when used by multiple operators and examined whether the variability in performance was different on the back compared with the forearm.Methods Eight adult volunteer ''operators'' were trained in the use of 4 devices: Greer Pick, Quintip, Stallergenes Lancet, and Feather Lancet. Each operator performed a histamine skin prick test with all devices on the backs and forearms of 5 volunteer ''receivers.'' Variability in results was assessed using a multilevel (random effects) regression model.Results After controlling for variation between users and receivers, the residual variability or ''measurement error'' was least for the Stallergenes Lancet, closely followed by the Quintip. The Greer Pick had the greatest variability. There was greater variability in measurements on the arm compared with the back.Conclusions The devices using the ''puncture'' method (Stallergenes Lancet, Quintip) provide less variability in results than those using a ''prick'' method when carried out by multiple users (Greer Pick and Feather Lancet). Testing on the back also gives less variable results compared with the arm. Keywords: device, skin prick test, variabilityhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1939455119304016
spellingShingle Rebecca L. Werther, MBBS, FRACP
Sharon Choo, MBBS, FRACP, FRCPA
Katherine J. Lee, BSc, PhD
Debra Poole, BNurs
Katrina J. Allen, MBBS, BMedSc, FRACP, PhD
Mimi L.K. Tang, MBBS, PhD, FRACP, FRCPA
Variability in Skin Prick Test Results Performed by Multiple Operators Depends on the Device Used
World Allergy Organization Journal
title Variability in Skin Prick Test Results Performed by Multiple Operators Depends on the Device Used
title_full Variability in Skin Prick Test Results Performed by Multiple Operators Depends on the Device Used
title_fullStr Variability in Skin Prick Test Results Performed by Multiple Operators Depends on the Device Used
title_full_unstemmed Variability in Skin Prick Test Results Performed by Multiple Operators Depends on the Device Used
title_short Variability in Skin Prick Test Results Performed by Multiple Operators Depends on the Device Used
title_sort variability in skin prick test results performed by multiple operators depends on the device used
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1939455119304016
work_keys_str_mv AT rebeccalwerthermbbsfracp variabilityinskinpricktestresultsperformedbymultipleoperatorsdependsonthedeviceused
AT sharonchoombbsfracpfrcpa variabilityinskinpricktestresultsperformedbymultipleoperatorsdependsonthedeviceused
AT katherinejleebscphd variabilityinskinpricktestresultsperformedbymultipleoperatorsdependsonthedeviceused
AT debrapoolebnurs variabilityinskinpricktestresultsperformedbymultipleoperatorsdependsonthedeviceused
AT katrinajallenmbbsbmedscfracpphd variabilityinskinpricktestresultsperformedbymultipleoperatorsdependsonthedeviceused
AT mimilktangmbbsphdfracpfrcpa variabilityinskinpricktestresultsperformedbymultipleoperatorsdependsonthedeviceused