DEBAT DAN ARGUMEN (HAKIKAT, RAGAM, DAN STRATEGI)
Debate is arguing for certain topic with different opinion or claim between affirmative team and negative team. Seing from its elements, argument can be analyzed through two models; traditional argument model and Toulmin argument model. Traditional model is classified into four lay outs, namely (1...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
State Institute of Islamic Studies (IAIN) Tulungagung
2010-06-01
|
| Series: | Jurnal Bahasa Lingua Scientia |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://ejournal.iain-tulungagung.ac.id/index.php/ls/article/view/2099 |
| _version_ | 1819243116414107648 |
|---|---|
| author | M. Jazeri |
| author_facet | M. Jazeri |
| author_sort | M. Jazeri |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Debate is arguing for certain topic with different opinion or claim between affirmative team and negative team. Seing from its elements, argument can be analyzed through two models; traditional argument model and Toulmin argument model. Traditional model is classified into four lay outs, namely (1) simple layout, (2) complex layout, (3) chain layout, and (4) compound layout. Toulmin model is classified into five layouts, namely layout I, layout II, layout III, layout IV, and layout V. Seing from its fallacy, the fallacy of argument is categorized into linguistics fallacy and relevance fallacy. Linguistics fallacies are equivoc term, amfiboly term, composition fallacy, devision fallacy, and accent fallacy. While relevance fallacies are argumentum ad hominem, argumentum ad verecundian, argumentum ad baculum, argumentum ad populum, argumentum ad misericordian, post hoc propter hoc, petitio principi, argumentum ad ignorantiam, dan ignoratio elenchi. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-23T14:50:35Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-a61fcfc175274ae8b31ccdb281b88a46 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2086-1753 2549-4228 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-23T14:50:35Z |
| publishDate | 2010-06-01 |
| publisher | State Institute of Islamic Studies (IAIN) Tulungagung |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Jurnal Bahasa Lingua Scientia |
| spelling | doaj.art-a61fcfc175274ae8b31ccdb281b88a462022-12-21T17:42:57ZengState Institute of Islamic Studies (IAIN) TulungagungJurnal Bahasa Lingua Scientia2086-17532549-42282010-06-012110.21274/ls.v2i1.2099DEBAT DAN ARGUMEN (HAKIKAT, RAGAM, DAN STRATEGI)M. Jazeri0STAIN TulungagungDebate is arguing for certain topic with different opinion or claim between affirmative team and negative team. Seing from its elements, argument can be analyzed through two models; traditional argument model and Toulmin argument model. Traditional model is classified into four lay outs, namely (1) simple layout, (2) complex layout, (3) chain layout, and (4) compound layout. Toulmin model is classified into five layouts, namely layout I, layout II, layout III, layout IV, and layout V. Seing from its fallacy, the fallacy of argument is categorized into linguistics fallacy and relevance fallacy. Linguistics fallacies are equivoc term, amfiboly term, composition fallacy, devision fallacy, and accent fallacy. While relevance fallacies are argumentum ad hominem, argumentum ad verecundian, argumentum ad baculum, argumentum ad populum, argumentum ad misericordian, post hoc propter hoc, petitio principi, argumentum ad ignorantiam, dan ignoratio elenchi.http://ejournal.iain-tulungagung.ac.id/index.php/ls/article/view/2099debateargumentreasoningfallacy |
| spellingShingle | M. Jazeri DEBAT DAN ARGUMEN (HAKIKAT, RAGAM, DAN STRATEGI) Jurnal Bahasa Lingua Scientia debate argument reasoning fallacy |
| title | DEBAT DAN ARGUMEN (HAKIKAT, RAGAM, DAN STRATEGI) |
| title_full | DEBAT DAN ARGUMEN (HAKIKAT, RAGAM, DAN STRATEGI) |
| title_fullStr | DEBAT DAN ARGUMEN (HAKIKAT, RAGAM, DAN STRATEGI) |
| title_full_unstemmed | DEBAT DAN ARGUMEN (HAKIKAT, RAGAM, DAN STRATEGI) |
| title_short | DEBAT DAN ARGUMEN (HAKIKAT, RAGAM, DAN STRATEGI) |
| title_sort | debat dan argumen hakikat ragam dan strategi |
| topic | debate argument reasoning fallacy |
| url | http://ejournal.iain-tulungagung.ac.id/index.php/ls/article/view/2099 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mjazeri debatdanargumenhakikatragamdanstrategi |