Progress in the Pacific on sugar‐sweetened beverage taxes: a systematic review of policy changes from 2000 to 2019

Abstract Objective: To systematically characterise sugar‐sweetened beverage (SSB) tax policy changes in Pacific Island countries and territories (PICTs) from 2000 to 2019. Methods: Medline, Google Scholar, Pacific Islands Legal Information Institute database, Factiva and news and government websites...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrea Teng, Wendy Snowdon, Si Thu Win Tin, Murat Genç, Elisiva Na'ati, Viliami Puloka, Louise Signal, Nick Wilson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-08-01
Series:Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.13123
_version_ 1797713235120488448
author Andrea Teng
Wendy Snowdon
Si Thu Win Tin
Murat Genç
Elisiva Na'ati
Viliami Puloka
Louise Signal
Nick Wilson
author_facet Andrea Teng
Wendy Snowdon
Si Thu Win Tin
Murat Genç
Elisiva Na'ati
Viliami Puloka
Louise Signal
Nick Wilson
author_sort Andrea Teng
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective: To systematically characterise sugar‐sweetened beverage (SSB) tax policy changes in Pacific Island countries and territories (PICTs) from 2000 to 2019. Methods: Medline, Google Scholar, Pacific Islands Legal Information Institute database, Factiva and news and government websites were systematically searched up to October 2019. Information was extracted on the date and SSB tax level change, tax type, included beverages, and earmarking; and checked for consistency with local experts. Results: Three‐quarters of PICTs had an SSB tax (n=16/21) and 11 of these were excise taxes that included both imported and locally produced beverages. The level of tax was over 20% in 14 jurisdictions. SSB tax was increased by more than 20 percentage points in eight PICTs. Most taxes were ad valorem or volumetric, three were earmarked and only two taxes targeted sugar‐sweetened fruit juices. The majority of countries (14/21) had different tax rates for imported and locally produced beverages. Conclusions: More than three‐quarters of PICTs have SSB taxes. More than one‐third increased these taxes since 2000 at an amount that is expected to reduce soft drink consumption. Implications for public health: Despite high‐quality tax design elements in some PICTs, SSB control policies could generally be strengthened to improve health benefits, e.g. by targeting all SSBs and earmarking revenue for health.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T07:33:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a62d5cf6411948e887fdd4ae04291a95
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1326-0200
1753-6405
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T07:33:24Z
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
spelling doaj.art-a62d5cf6411948e887fdd4ae04291a952023-09-02T21:41:58ZengElsevierAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health1326-02001753-64052021-08-0145437638410.1111/1753-6405.13123Progress in the Pacific on sugar‐sweetened beverage taxes: a systematic review of policy changes from 2000 to 2019Andrea Teng0Wendy Snowdon1Si Thu Win Tin2Murat Genç3Elisiva Na'ati4Viliami Puloka5Louise Signal6Nick Wilson7Department of Public Health University of Otago Wellington New ZealandCentre for Obesity Prevention Deakin University VictoriaPacific Community FijiOtago Business School University of Otago New ZealandPacific Community FijiDepartment of Public Health University of Otago Wellington New ZealandDepartment of Public Health University of Otago Wellington New ZealandDepartment of Public Health University of Otago Wellington New ZealandAbstract Objective: To systematically characterise sugar‐sweetened beverage (SSB) tax policy changes in Pacific Island countries and territories (PICTs) from 2000 to 2019. Methods: Medline, Google Scholar, Pacific Islands Legal Information Institute database, Factiva and news and government websites were systematically searched up to October 2019. Information was extracted on the date and SSB tax level change, tax type, included beverages, and earmarking; and checked for consistency with local experts. Results: Three‐quarters of PICTs had an SSB tax (n=16/21) and 11 of these were excise taxes that included both imported and locally produced beverages. The level of tax was over 20% in 14 jurisdictions. SSB tax was increased by more than 20 percentage points in eight PICTs. Most taxes were ad valorem or volumetric, three were earmarked and only two taxes targeted sugar‐sweetened fruit juices. The majority of countries (14/21) had different tax rates for imported and locally produced beverages. Conclusions: More than three‐quarters of PICTs have SSB taxes. More than one‐third increased these taxes since 2000 at an amount that is expected to reduce soft drink consumption. Implications for public health: Despite high‐quality tax design elements in some PICTs, SSB control policies could generally be strengthened to improve health benefits, e.g. by targeting all SSBs and earmarking revenue for health.https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.13123Pacificexcisebeveragesoft drinksugar
spellingShingle Andrea Teng
Wendy Snowdon
Si Thu Win Tin
Murat Genç
Elisiva Na'ati
Viliami Puloka
Louise Signal
Nick Wilson
Progress in the Pacific on sugar‐sweetened beverage taxes: a systematic review of policy changes from 2000 to 2019
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
Pacific
excise
beverage
soft drink
sugar
title Progress in the Pacific on sugar‐sweetened beverage taxes: a systematic review of policy changes from 2000 to 2019
title_full Progress in the Pacific on sugar‐sweetened beverage taxes: a systematic review of policy changes from 2000 to 2019
title_fullStr Progress in the Pacific on sugar‐sweetened beverage taxes: a systematic review of policy changes from 2000 to 2019
title_full_unstemmed Progress in the Pacific on sugar‐sweetened beverage taxes: a systematic review of policy changes from 2000 to 2019
title_short Progress in the Pacific on sugar‐sweetened beverage taxes: a systematic review of policy changes from 2000 to 2019
title_sort progress in the pacific on sugar sweetened beverage taxes a systematic review of policy changes from 2000 to 2019
topic Pacific
excise
beverage
soft drink
sugar
url https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.13123
work_keys_str_mv AT andreateng progressinthepacificonsugarsweetenedbeveragetaxesasystematicreviewofpolicychangesfrom2000to2019
AT wendysnowdon progressinthepacificonsugarsweetenedbeveragetaxesasystematicreviewofpolicychangesfrom2000to2019
AT sithuwintin progressinthepacificonsugarsweetenedbeveragetaxesasystematicreviewofpolicychangesfrom2000to2019
AT muratgenc progressinthepacificonsugarsweetenedbeveragetaxesasystematicreviewofpolicychangesfrom2000to2019
AT elisivanaati progressinthepacificonsugarsweetenedbeveragetaxesasystematicreviewofpolicychangesfrom2000to2019
AT viliamipuloka progressinthepacificonsugarsweetenedbeveragetaxesasystematicreviewofpolicychangesfrom2000to2019
AT louisesignal progressinthepacificonsugarsweetenedbeveragetaxesasystematicreviewofpolicychangesfrom2000to2019
AT nickwilson progressinthepacificonsugarsweetenedbeveragetaxesasystematicreviewofpolicychangesfrom2000to2019