Individual Differences in the Frequency-Following Response: Relation to Pitch Perception.
The scalp-recorded frequency-following response (FFR) is a measure of the auditory nervous system's representation of periodic sound, and may serve as a marker of training-related enhancements, behavioural deficits, and clinical conditions. However, FFRs of healthy normal subjects show consider...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2016-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4807774?pdf=render |
| _version_ | 1828787666147082240 |
|---|---|
| author | Emily B J Coffey Emilia M G Colagrosso Alexandre Lehmann Marc Schönwiesner Robert J Zatorre |
| author_facet | Emily B J Coffey Emilia M G Colagrosso Alexandre Lehmann Marc Schönwiesner Robert J Zatorre |
| author_sort | Emily B J Coffey |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The scalp-recorded frequency-following response (FFR) is a measure of the auditory nervous system's representation of periodic sound, and may serve as a marker of training-related enhancements, behavioural deficits, and clinical conditions. However, FFRs of healthy normal subjects show considerable variability that remains unexplained. We investigated whether the FFR representation of the frequency content of a complex tone is related to the perception of the pitch of the fundamental frequency. The strength of the fundamental frequency in the FFR of 39 people with normal hearing was assessed when they listened to complex tones that either included or lacked energy at the fundamental frequency. We found that the strength of the fundamental representation of the missing fundamental tone complex correlated significantly with people's general tendency to perceive the pitch of the tone as either matching the frequency of the spectral components that were present, or that of the missing fundamental. Although at a group level the fundamental representation in the FFR did not appear to be affected by the presence or absence of energy at the same frequency in the stimulus, the two conditions were statistically distinguishable for some subjects individually, indicating that the neural representation is not linearly dependent on the stimulus content. In a second experiment using a within-subjects paradigm, we showed that subjects can learn to reversibly select between either fundamental or spectral perception, and that this is accompanied both by changes to the fundamental representation in the FFR and to cortical-based gamma activity. These results suggest that both fundamental and spectral representations coexist, and are available for later auditory processing stages, the requirements of which may also influence their relative strength and thus modulate FFR variability. The data also highlight voluntary mode perception as a new paradigm with which to study top-down vs bottom-up mechanisms that support the emerging view of the FFR as the outcome of integrated processing in the entire auditory system. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-12T00:36:41Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-a64d53c794c24d86bca87167a17d6eab |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-12T00:36:41Z |
| publishDate | 2016-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-a64d53c794c24d86bca87167a17d6eab2022-12-22T00:44:21ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01113e015237410.1371/journal.pone.0152374Individual Differences in the Frequency-Following Response: Relation to Pitch Perception.Emily B J CoffeyEmilia M G ColagrossoAlexandre LehmannMarc SchönwiesnerRobert J ZatorreThe scalp-recorded frequency-following response (FFR) is a measure of the auditory nervous system's representation of periodic sound, and may serve as a marker of training-related enhancements, behavioural deficits, and clinical conditions. However, FFRs of healthy normal subjects show considerable variability that remains unexplained. We investigated whether the FFR representation of the frequency content of a complex tone is related to the perception of the pitch of the fundamental frequency. The strength of the fundamental frequency in the FFR of 39 people with normal hearing was assessed when they listened to complex tones that either included or lacked energy at the fundamental frequency. We found that the strength of the fundamental representation of the missing fundamental tone complex correlated significantly with people's general tendency to perceive the pitch of the tone as either matching the frequency of the spectral components that were present, or that of the missing fundamental. Although at a group level the fundamental representation in the FFR did not appear to be affected by the presence or absence of energy at the same frequency in the stimulus, the two conditions were statistically distinguishable for some subjects individually, indicating that the neural representation is not linearly dependent on the stimulus content. In a second experiment using a within-subjects paradigm, we showed that subjects can learn to reversibly select between either fundamental or spectral perception, and that this is accompanied both by changes to the fundamental representation in the FFR and to cortical-based gamma activity. These results suggest that both fundamental and spectral representations coexist, and are available for later auditory processing stages, the requirements of which may also influence their relative strength and thus modulate FFR variability. The data also highlight voluntary mode perception as a new paradigm with which to study top-down vs bottom-up mechanisms that support the emerging view of the FFR as the outcome of integrated processing in the entire auditory system.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4807774?pdf=render |
| spellingShingle | Emily B J Coffey Emilia M G Colagrosso Alexandre Lehmann Marc Schönwiesner Robert J Zatorre Individual Differences in the Frequency-Following Response: Relation to Pitch Perception. PLoS ONE |
| title | Individual Differences in the Frequency-Following Response: Relation to Pitch Perception. |
| title_full | Individual Differences in the Frequency-Following Response: Relation to Pitch Perception. |
| title_fullStr | Individual Differences in the Frequency-Following Response: Relation to Pitch Perception. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Individual Differences in the Frequency-Following Response: Relation to Pitch Perception. |
| title_short | Individual Differences in the Frequency-Following Response: Relation to Pitch Perception. |
| title_sort | individual differences in the frequency following response relation to pitch perception |
| url | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4807774?pdf=render |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT emilybjcoffey individualdifferencesinthefrequencyfollowingresponserelationtopitchperception AT emiliamgcolagrosso individualdifferencesinthefrequencyfollowingresponserelationtopitchperception AT alexandrelehmann individualdifferencesinthefrequencyfollowingresponserelationtopitchperception AT marcschonwiesner individualdifferencesinthefrequencyfollowingresponserelationtopitchperception AT robertjzatorre individualdifferencesinthefrequencyfollowingresponserelationtopitchperception |