Geographical Health District and Distance Traveled Influence on Clinical Status at Admission of Patients with Gestational Trophoblastic Disease
Abstract Objective To assess the potential relationship of clinical status upon admission and distance traveled from geographical health district in women with gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD). Methods This is a cross-sectional study including women with GTD from the 17 health districts fro...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
2023-09-01
|
Series: | Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032023000700384&tlng=en |
_version_ | 1827820588367872000 |
---|---|
author | Valdete Aparecida Ribeiro da Silva Izildinha Maestá Roberto Antonio de Araújo Costa Aline de Ávila Campos Antonio Braga Neil Horowitz Kevin M. Elias Ross Berkowitz |
author_facet | Valdete Aparecida Ribeiro da Silva Izildinha Maestá Roberto Antonio de Araújo Costa Aline de Ávila Campos Antonio Braga Neil Horowitz Kevin M. Elias Ross Berkowitz |
author_sort | Valdete Aparecida Ribeiro da Silva |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Objective To assess the potential relationship of clinical status upon admission and distance traveled from geographical health district in women with gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD). Methods This is a cross-sectional study including women with GTD from the 17 health districts from the São Paulo state (I–XVII), Brazil, referred to the Botucatu Trophoblastic Disease Center (specialized center, district VI), between 1990 and 2018. At admission, hydatidiform mole was assessed according to the risk score system of Berkowitz et al. Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia was evaluated using the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics / World Health Organization (FIGO/WHO) staging/risk score. Data on demographics, clinical status and distance traveled were collected. Multiple regression analyses were performed. Results This study included 366 women (335 hydatidiform mole, 31 gestational trophoblastic neoplasia). The clinical status at admission and distance traveled significantly differed between the specialized center district and other districts. Patients referred from health districts IX (β = 2.38 [0.87–3.88], p = 0.002) and XVI (β = 0.78 [0.02–1.55], p = 0.045) had higher hydatidiform mole scores than those from the specialized center district. Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia patients from district XVI showed a 3.32 increase in FIGO risk scores compared with those from the specialized center area (β = 3.32, 95% CI = 0.78–5.87, p = 0.010). Distance traveled by patients from districts IX (200km) and XVI (203.5km) was significantly longer than that traveled by patients from the specialized center district (76km). Conclusion Patients from health districts outside the specialized center area had higher risk scores for both hydatidiform mole and gestational trophoblastic neoplasia at admission. Long distances (>80 km) seemed to adversely influence gestational trophoblastic disease clinical status at admission, indicating barriers to accessing specialized centers. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-12T01:29:30Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-a65da38f990c4135b907cae5454d1013 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0100-7203 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-12T01:29:30Z |
publishDate | 2023-09-01 |
publisher | Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia |
record_format | Article |
series | Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia |
spelling | doaj.art-a65da38f990c4135b907cae5454d10132023-09-12T07:41:59ZengFederação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e ObstetríciaRevista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia0100-72032023-09-0145738439210.1055/s-0043-1772179Geographical Health District and Distance Traveled Influence on Clinical Status at Admission of Patients with Gestational Trophoblastic DiseaseValdete Aparecida Ribeiro da Silvahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0708-2788Izildinha Maestáhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5875-7335Roberto Antonio de Araújo Costahttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4074-252XAline de Ávila Camposhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1996-6772Antonio Bragahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2942-6182Neil Horowitzhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4854-0642Kevin M. Eliashttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1502-5553Ross Berkowitzhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7569-898XAbstract Objective To assess the potential relationship of clinical status upon admission and distance traveled from geographical health district in women with gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD). Methods This is a cross-sectional study including women with GTD from the 17 health districts from the São Paulo state (I–XVII), Brazil, referred to the Botucatu Trophoblastic Disease Center (specialized center, district VI), between 1990 and 2018. At admission, hydatidiform mole was assessed according to the risk score system of Berkowitz et al. Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia was evaluated using the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics / World Health Organization (FIGO/WHO) staging/risk score. Data on demographics, clinical status and distance traveled were collected. Multiple regression analyses were performed. Results This study included 366 women (335 hydatidiform mole, 31 gestational trophoblastic neoplasia). The clinical status at admission and distance traveled significantly differed between the specialized center district and other districts. Patients referred from health districts IX (β = 2.38 [0.87–3.88], p = 0.002) and XVI (β = 0.78 [0.02–1.55], p = 0.045) had higher hydatidiform mole scores than those from the specialized center district. Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia patients from district XVI showed a 3.32 increase in FIGO risk scores compared with those from the specialized center area (β = 3.32, 95% CI = 0.78–5.87, p = 0.010). Distance traveled by patients from districts IX (200km) and XVI (203.5km) was significantly longer than that traveled by patients from the specialized center district (76km). Conclusion Patients from health districts outside the specialized center area had higher risk scores for both hydatidiform mole and gestational trophoblastic neoplasia at admission. Long distances (>80 km) seemed to adversely influence gestational trophoblastic disease clinical status at admission, indicating barriers to accessing specialized centers.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032023000700384&tlng=engestational trophoblastic diseasegeographical health districtdistance traveledclinical statusreferral center |
spellingShingle | Valdete Aparecida Ribeiro da Silva Izildinha Maestá Roberto Antonio de Araújo Costa Aline de Ávila Campos Antonio Braga Neil Horowitz Kevin M. Elias Ross Berkowitz Geographical Health District and Distance Traveled Influence on Clinical Status at Admission of Patients with Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia gestational trophoblastic disease geographical health district distance traveled clinical status referral center |
title | Geographical Health District and Distance Traveled Influence on Clinical Status at Admission of Patients with Gestational Trophoblastic Disease |
title_full | Geographical Health District and Distance Traveled Influence on Clinical Status at Admission of Patients with Gestational Trophoblastic Disease |
title_fullStr | Geographical Health District and Distance Traveled Influence on Clinical Status at Admission of Patients with Gestational Trophoblastic Disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Geographical Health District and Distance Traveled Influence on Clinical Status at Admission of Patients with Gestational Trophoblastic Disease |
title_short | Geographical Health District and Distance Traveled Influence on Clinical Status at Admission of Patients with Gestational Trophoblastic Disease |
title_sort | geographical health district and distance traveled influence on clinical status at admission of patients with gestational trophoblastic disease |
topic | gestational trophoblastic disease geographical health district distance traveled clinical status referral center |
url | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032023000700384&tlng=en |
work_keys_str_mv | AT valdeteaparecidaribeirodasilva geographicalhealthdistrictanddistancetraveledinfluenceonclinicalstatusatadmissionofpatientswithgestationaltrophoblasticdisease AT izildinhamaesta geographicalhealthdistrictanddistancetraveledinfluenceonclinicalstatusatadmissionofpatientswithgestationaltrophoblasticdisease AT robertoantoniodearaujocosta geographicalhealthdistrictanddistancetraveledinfluenceonclinicalstatusatadmissionofpatientswithgestationaltrophoblasticdisease AT alinedeavilacampos geographicalhealthdistrictanddistancetraveledinfluenceonclinicalstatusatadmissionofpatientswithgestationaltrophoblasticdisease AT antoniobraga geographicalhealthdistrictanddistancetraveledinfluenceonclinicalstatusatadmissionofpatientswithgestationaltrophoblasticdisease AT neilhorowitz geographicalhealthdistrictanddistancetraveledinfluenceonclinicalstatusatadmissionofpatientswithgestationaltrophoblasticdisease AT kevinmelias geographicalhealthdistrictanddistancetraveledinfluenceonclinicalstatusatadmissionofpatientswithgestationaltrophoblasticdisease AT rossberkowitz geographicalhealthdistrictanddistancetraveledinfluenceonclinicalstatusatadmissionofpatientswithgestationaltrophoblasticdisease |