Geographical Health District and Distance Traveled Influence on Clinical Status at Admission of Patients with Gestational Trophoblastic Disease

Abstract Objective To assess the potential relationship of clinical status upon admission and distance traveled from geographical health district in women with gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD). Methods This is a cross-sectional study including women with GTD from the 17 health districts fro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Valdete Aparecida Ribeiro da Silva, Izildinha Maestá, Roberto Antonio de Araújo Costa, Aline de Ávila Campos, Antonio Braga, Neil Horowitz, Kevin M. Elias, Ross Berkowitz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia 2023-09-01
Series:Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032023000700384&tlng=en
_version_ 1827820588367872000
author Valdete Aparecida Ribeiro da Silva
Izildinha Maestá
Roberto Antonio de Araújo Costa
Aline de Ávila Campos
Antonio Braga
Neil Horowitz
Kevin M. Elias
Ross Berkowitz
author_facet Valdete Aparecida Ribeiro da Silva
Izildinha Maestá
Roberto Antonio de Araújo Costa
Aline de Ávila Campos
Antonio Braga
Neil Horowitz
Kevin M. Elias
Ross Berkowitz
author_sort Valdete Aparecida Ribeiro da Silva
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective To assess the potential relationship of clinical status upon admission and distance traveled from geographical health district in women with gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD). Methods This is a cross-sectional study including women with GTD from the 17 health districts from the São Paulo state (I–XVII), Brazil, referred to the Botucatu Trophoblastic Disease Center (specialized center, district VI), between 1990 and 2018. At admission, hydatidiform mole was assessed according to the risk score system of Berkowitz et al. Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia was evaluated using the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics / World Health Organization (FIGO/WHO) staging/risk score. Data on demographics, clinical status and distance traveled were collected. Multiple regression analyses were performed. Results This study included 366 women (335 hydatidiform mole, 31 gestational trophoblastic neoplasia). The clinical status at admission and distance traveled significantly differed between the specialized center district and other districts. Patients referred from health districts IX (β = 2.38 [0.87–3.88], p = 0.002) and XVI (β = 0.78 [0.02–1.55], p = 0.045) had higher hydatidiform mole scores than those from the specialized center district. Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia patients from district XVI showed a 3.32 increase in FIGO risk scores compared with those from the specialized center area (β = 3.32, 95% CI = 0.78–5.87, p = 0.010). Distance traveled by patients from districts IX (200km) and XVI (203.5km) was significantly longer than that traveled by patients from the specialized center district (76km). Conclusion Patients from health districts outside the specialized center area had higher risk scores for both hydatidiform mole and gestational trophoblastic neoplasia at admission. Long distances (>80 km) seemed to adversely influence gestational trophoblastic disease clinical status at admission, indicating barriers to accessing specialized centers.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T01:29:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a65da38f990c4135b907cae5454d1013
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0100-7203
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T01:29:30Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
record_format Article
series Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
spelling doaj.art-a65da38f990c4135b907cae5454d10132023-09-12T07:41:59ZengFederação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e ObstetríciaRevista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia0100-72032023-09-0145738439210.1055/s-0043-1772179Geographical Health District and Distance Traveled Influence on Clinical Status at Admission of Patients with Gestational Trophoblastic DiseaseValdete Aparecida Ribeiro da Silvahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0708-2788Izildinha Maestáhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5875-7335Roberto Antonio de Araújo Costahttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4074-252XAline de Ávila Camposhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1996-6772Antonio Bragahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2942-6182Neil Horowitzhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4854-0642Kevin M. Eliashttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1502-5553Ross Berkowitzhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7569-898XAbstract Objective To assess the potential relationship of clinical status upon admission and distance traveled from geographical health district in women with gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD). Methods This is a cross-sectional study including women with GTD from the 17 health districts from the São Paulo state (I–XVII), Brazil, referred to the Botucatu Trophoblastic Disease Center (specialized center, district VI), between 1990 and 2018. At admission, hydatidiform mole was assessed according to the risk score system of Berkowitz et al. Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia was evaluated using the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics / World Health Organization (FIGO/WHO) staging/risk score. Data on demographics, clinical status and distance traveled were collected. Multiple regression analyses were performed. Results This study included 366 women (335 hydatidiform mole, 31 gestational trophoblastic neoplasia). The clinical status at admission and distance traveled significantly differed between the specialized center district and other districts. Patients referred from health districts IX (β = 2.38 [0.87–3.88], p = 0.002) and XVI (β = 0.78 [0.02–1.55], p = 0.045) had higher hydatidiform mole scores than those from the specialized center district. Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia patients from district XVI showed a 3.32 increase in FIGO risk scores compared with those from the specialized center area (β = 3.32, 95% CI = 0.78–5.87, p = 0.010). Distance traveled by patients from districts IX (200km) and XVI (203.5km) was significantly longer than that traveled by patients from the specialized center district (76km). Conclusion Patients from health districts outside the specialized center area had higher risk scores for both hydatidiform mole and gestational trophoblastic neoplasia at admission. Long distances (>80 km) seemed to adversely influence gestational trophoblastic disease clinical status at admission, indicating barriers to accessing specialized centers.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032023000700384&tlng=engestational trophoblastic diseasegeographical health districtdistance traveledclinical statusreferral center
spellingShingle Valdete Aparecida Ribeiro da Silva
Izildinha Maestá
Roberto Antonio de Araújo Costa
Aline de Ávila Campos
Antonio Braga
Neil Horowitz
Kevin M. Elias
Ross Berkowitz
Geographical Health District and Distance Traveled Influence on Clinical Status at Admission of Patients with Gestational Trophoblastic Disease
Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
gestational trophoblastic disease
geographical health district
distance traveled
clinical status
referral center
title Geographical Health District and Distance Traveled Influence on Clinical Status at Admission of Patients with Gestational Trophoblastic Disease
title_full Geographical Health District and Distance Traveled Influence on Clinical Status at Admission of Patients with Gestational Trophoblastic Disease
title_fullStr Geographical Health District and Distance Traveled Influence on Clinical Status at Admission of Patients with Gestational Trophoblastic Disease
title_full_unstemmed Geographical Health District and Distance Traveled Influence on Clinical Status at Admission of Patients with Gestational Trophoblastic Disease
title_short Geographical Health District and Distance Traveled Influence on Clinical Status at Admission of Patients with Gestational Trophoblastic Disease
title_sort geographical health district and distance traveled influence on clinical status at admission of patients with gestational trophoblastic disease
topic gestational trophoblastic disease
geographical health district
distance traveled
clinical status
referral center
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032023000700384&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT valdeteaparecidaribeirodasilva geographicalhealthdistrictanddistancetraveledinfluenceonclinicalstatusatadmissionofpatientswithgestationaltrophoblasticdisease
AT izildinhamaesta geographicalhealthdistrictanddistancetraveledinfluenceonclinicalstatusatadmissionofpatientswithgestationaltrophoblasticdisease
AT robertoantoniodearaujocosta geographicalhealthdistrictanddistancetraveledinfluenceonclinicalstatusatadmissionofpatientswithgestationaltrophoblasticdisease
AT alinedeavilacampos geographicalhealthdistrictanddistancetraveledinfluenceonclinicalstatusatadmissionofpatientswithgestationaltrophoblasticdisease
AT antoniobraga geographicalhealthdistrictanddistancetraveledinfluenceonclinicalstatusatadmissionofpatientswithgestationaltrophoblasticdisease
AT neilhorowitz geographicalhealthdistrictanddistancetraveledinfluenceonclinicalstatusatadmissionofpatientswithgestationaltrophoblasticdisease
AT kevinmelias geographicalhealthdistrictanddistancetraveledinfluenceonclinicalstatusatadmissionofpatientswithgestationaltrophoblasticdisease
AT rossberkowitz geographicalhealthdistrictanddistancetraveledinfluenceonclinicalstatusatadmissionofpatientswithgestationaltrophoblasticdisease