A comparison of efficacy of parenteral and perineural dexmedetomidine with 0.25% ropivacaine for post.thyroidectomy analgesia using bilateral superficial cervical plexus block

Background and Aims: Opioids are conventionally used for post-thyroidectomy pain, regional anesthesia is becoming popular due to its feasibility and efficacy in minimizing use of opioids and hence its side effects. This study compared analgesic efficacy of bilateral superficial cervical plexus bloc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Neena Jain, Pooja R Mathur, Kriti Lakhina, Veena Patodi, Kavita Jain, Deepak Garg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2023-01-01
Series:Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.joacp.org/article.asp?issn=0970-9185;year=2023;volume=39;issue=1;spage=98;epage=105;aulast=Jain
_version_ 1797774102232039424
author Neena Jain
Pooja R Mathur
Kriti Lakhina
Veena Patodi
Kavita Jain
Deepak Garg
author_facet Neena Jain
Pooja R Mathur
Kriti Lakhina
Veena Patodi
Kavita Jain
Deepak Garg
author_sort Neena Jain
collection DOAJ
description Background and Aims: Opioids are conventionally used for post-thyroidectomy pain, regional anesthesia is becoming popular due to its feasibility and efficacy in minimizing use of opioids and hence its side effects. This study compared analgesic efficacy of bilateral superficial cervical plexus block (BSCPB) using perineural and parenteral dexmedetomidine with 0.25% ropivacaine in thyroidectomy patients. Material and Methods: In this double-blind study, 60 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II thyroidectomy patients, aged 18–65 years were randomized into two groups. Group A (n = 30) received BSCPB with 0.25% ropivacaine, 10 mL on each side with dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg IV infusion. Group B (n = 30) received 0.25% ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg, ten mL on each side. Duration of analgesia by measuring pain visual analog scores (VAS), total dose of analgesic requirement, Haemodynamics parameters and adverse events were recorded for 24 h. Categorical variables were analyzed using Chi-square test and continuous variables were computed as mean with standard deviation and analyzed using independent sample t-test. Mann-Whitney U test was used for analysis of ordinal variables. Results: Time to rescue analgesia was longer in Group B (18.6 ± 3.27 h) as compared to Group A (10.2 ± 2.11 h) (P < 0.001). Total analgesic dose required was also found to be lesser in Group B (50.83 ± 20.37 mg) as compared to Group A (73.33 ± 18.27 mg) (P < 0.001). No significant hemodynamic changes or side effects were observed in both groups; (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Perineural dexmedetomidine with ropivacaine in BSCPB significantly prolonged the duration of analgesia with reduced rescue analgesic requirement.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T22:16:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a67ebaad08084728bdf52b214d2652a9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0970-9185
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T22:16:09Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology
spelling doaj.art-a67ebaad08084728bdf52b214d2652a92023-07-23T11:17:37ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology0970-91852023-01-013919810510.4103/joacp.joacp_177_21A comparison of efficacy of parenteral and perineural dexmedetomidine with 0.25% ropivacaine for post.thyroidectomy analgesia using bilateral superficial cervical plexus blockNeena JainPooja R MathurKriti LakhinaVeena PatodiKavita JainDeepak GargBackground and Aims: Opioids are conventionally used for post-thyroidectomy pain, regional anesthesia is becoming popular due to its feasibility and efficacy in minimizing use of opioids and hence its side effects. This study compared analgesic efficacy of bilateral superficial cervical plexus block (BSCPB) using perineural and parenteral dexmedetomidine with 0.25% ropivacaine in thyroidectomy patients. Material and Methods: In this double-blind study, 60 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II thyroidectomy patients, aged 18–65 years were randomized into two groups. Group A (n = 30) received BSCPB with 0.25% ropivacaine, 10 mL on each side with dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg IV infusion. Group B (n = 30) received 0.25% ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg, ten mL on each side. Duration of analgesia by measuring pain visual analog scores (VAS), total dose of analgesic requirement, Haemodynamics parameters and adverse events were recorded for 24 h. Categorical variables were analyzed using Chi-square test and continuous variables were computed as mean with standard deviation and analyzed using independent sample t-test. Mann-Whitney U test was used for analysis of ordinal variables. Results: Time to rescue analgesia was longer in Group B (18.6 ± 3.27 h) as compared to Group A (10.2 ± 2.11 h) (P < 0.001). Total analgesic dose required was also found to be lesser in Group B (50.83 ± 20.37 mg) as compared to Group A (73.33 ± 18.27 mg) (P < 0.001). No significant hemodynamic changes or side effects were observed in both groups; (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Perineural dexmedetomidine with ropivacaine in BSCPB significantly prolonged the duration of analgesia with reduced rescue analgesic requirement.http://www.joacp.org/article.asp?issn=0970-9185;year=2023;volume=39;issue=1;spage=98;epage=105;aulast=Jainanesthetic techniquebilateral superficial cervical plexus blockdexmedetomidineropivacainepostoperative analgesiathyroidectomy
spellingShingle Neena Jain
Pooja R Mathur
Kriti Lakhina
Veena Patodi
Kavita Jain
Deepak Garg
A comparison of efficacy of parenteral and perineural dexmedetomidine with 0.25% ropivacaine for post.thyroidectomy analgesia using bilateral superficial cervical plexus block
Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology
anesthetic technique
bilateral superficial cervical plexus block
dexmedetomidine
ropivacaine
postoperative analgesia
thyroidectomy
title A comparison of efficacy of parenteral and perineural dexmedetomidine with 0.25% ropivacaine for post.thyroidectomy analgesia using bilateral superficial cervical plexus block
title_full A comparison of efficacy of parenteral and perineural dexmedetomidine with 0.25% ropivacaine for post.thyroidectomy analgesia using bilateral superficial cervical plexus block
title_fullStr A comparison of efficacy of parenteral and perineural dexmedetomidine with 0.25% ropivacaine for post.thyroidectomy analgesia using bilateral superficial cervical plexus block
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of efficacy of parenteral and perineural dexmedetomidine with 0.25% ropivacaine for post.thyroidectomy analgesia using bilateral superficial cervical plexus block
title_short A comparison of efficacy of parenteral and perineural dexmedetomidine with 0.25% ropivacaine for post.thyroidectomy analgesia using bilateral superficial cervical plexus block
title_sort comparison of efficacy of parenteral and perineural dexmedetomidine with 0 25 ropivacaine for post thyroidectomy analgesia using bilateral superficial cervical plexus block
topic anesthetic technique
bilateral superficial cervical plexus block
dexmedetomidine
ropivacaine
postoperative analgesia
thyroidectomy
url http://www.joacp.org/article.asp?issn=0970-9185;year=2023;volume=39;issue=1;spage=98;epage=105;aulast=Jain
work_keys_str_mv AT neenajain acomparisonofefficacyofparenteralandperineuraldexmedetomidinewith025ropivacaineforpostthyroidectomyanalgesiausingbilateralsuperficialcervicalplexusblock
AT poojarmathur acomparisonofefficacyofparenteralandperineuraldexmedetomidinewith025ropivacaineforpostthyroidectomyanalgesiausingbilateralsuperficialcervicalplexusblock
AT kritilakhina acomparisonofefficacyofparenteralandperineuraldexmedetomidinewith025ropivacaineforpostthyroidectomyanalgesiausingbilateralsuperficialcervicalplexusblock
AT veenapatodi acomparisonofefficacyofparenteralandperineuraldexmedetomidinewith025ropivacaineforpostthyroidectomyanalgesiausingbilateralsuperficialcervicalplexusblock
AT kavitajain acomparisonofefficacyofparenteralandperineuraldexmedetomidinewith025ropivacaineforpostthyroidectomyanalgesiausingbilateralsuperficialcervicalplexusblock
AT deepakgarg acomparisonofefficacyofparenteralandperineuraldexmedetomidinewith025ropivacaineforpostthyroidectomyanalgesiausingbilateralsuperficialcervicalplexusblock
AT neenajain comparisonofefficacyofparenteralandperineuraldexmedetomidinewith025ropivacaineforpostthyroidectomyanalgesiausingbilateralsuperficialcervicalplexusblock
AT poojarmathur comparisonofefficacyofparenteralandperineuraldexmedetomidinewith025ropivacaineforpostthyroidectomyanalgesiausingbilateralsuperficialcervicalplexusblock
AT kritilakhina comparisonofefficacyofparenteralandperineuraldexmedetomidinewith025ropivacaineforpostthyroidectomyanalgesiausingbilateralsuperficialcervicalplexusblock
AT veenapatodi comparisonofefficacyofparenteralandperineuraldexmedetomidinewith025ropivacaineforpostthyroidectomyanalgesiausingbilateralsuperficialcervicalplexusblock
AT kavitajain comparisonofefficacyofparenteralandperineuraldexmedetomidinewith025ropivacaineforpostthyroidectomyanalgesiausingbilateralsuperficialcervicalplexusblock
AT deepakgarg comparisonofefficacyofparenteralandperineuraldexmedetomidinewith025ropivacaineforpostthyroidectomyanalgesiausingbilateralsuperficialcervicalplexusblock