The Court’s Interference with Contracts by Supplying and Converting the Contractual Terms

Most modern legal systems have been searching for a legal measure that would help to imply omitted terms as well as rescue the validity of unsuccessfully concluded agreements, and they found such a solution in the concept of supplementary interpretation of contract, an example of which is conversio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Magdalena Bławat
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Utrecht University School of Law 2022-08-01
Series:Utrecht Law Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/759
_version_ 1798002241564573696
author Magdalena Bławat
author_facet Magdalena Bławat
author_sort Magdalena Bławat
collection DOAJ
description Most modern legal systems have been searching for a legal measure that would help to imply omitted terms as well as rescue the validity of unsuccessfully concluded agreements, and they found such a solution in the concept of supplementary interpretation of contract, an example of which is conversio actus iuridici. The tendencies visible in genere prove that whenever the law provides for too rigorous requirements for private ordering, the idea to supplement, imply, or convert contracts occurs. The presented comparative legal perspective is of great importance for Polish jurisprudence, which generally rejects the concept of supplementary interpretation of contracts, but accepts conversio actus iuridici. The analysis presented in this paper encourages representatives of Polish jurisprudence to wider adoption of the idea of supplementary interpretation of contracts, following the example of foreign legal orders.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T11:50:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a67f9d9b72684ee8b372ddb0ce61ea82
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1871-515X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T11:50:04Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher Utrecht University School of Law
record_format Article
series Utrecht Law Review
spelling doaj.art-a67f9d9b72684ee8b372ddb0ce61ea822022-12-22T04:25:25ZengUtrecht University School of LawUtrecht Law Review1871-515X2022-08-0118110.36633/ulr.759471The Court’s Interference with Contracts by Supplying and Converting the Contractual TermsMagdalena Bławat0Assistant Professor at the University of WarsawMost modern legal systems have been searching for a legal measure that would help to imply omitted terms as well as rescue the validity of unsuccessfully concluded agreements, and they found such a solution in the concept of supplementary interpretation of contract, an example of which is conversio actus iuridici. The tendencies visible in genere prove that whenever the law provides for too rigorous requirements for private ordering, the idea to supplement, imply, or convert contracts occurs. The presented comparative legal perspective is of great importance for Polish jurisprudence, which generally rejects the concept of supplementary interpretation of contracts, but accepts conversio actus iuridici. The analysis presented in this paper encourages representatives of Polish jurisprudence to wider adoption of the idea of supplementary interpretation of contracts, following the example of foreign legal orders.https://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/759interpretationcontractconversionnullityparty autonomy
spellingShingle Magdalena Bławat
The Court’s Interference with Contracts by Supplying and Converting the Contractual Terms
Utrecht Law Review
interpretation
contract
conversion
nullity
party autonomy
title The Court’s Interference with Contracts by Supplying and Converting the Contractual Terms
title_full The Court’s Interference with Contracts by Supplying and Converting the Contractual Terms
title_fullStr The Court’s Interference with Contracts by Supplying and Converting the Contractual Terms
title_full_unstemmed The Court’s Interference with Contracts by Supplying and Converting the Contractual Terms
title_short The Court’s Interference with Contracts by Supplying and Converting the Contractual Terms
title_sort court s interference with contracts by supplying and converting the contractual terms
topic interpretation
contract
conversion
nullity
party autonomy
url https://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/759
work_keys_str_mv AT magdalenabławat thecourtsinterferencewithcontractsbysupplyingandconvertingthecontractualterms
AT magdalenabławat courtsinterferencewithcontractsbysupplyingandconvertingthecontractualterms