Efficacy and Safety of Warfarin Therapy: Comparison Between Specialized INR Clinic and General Medical Clinic

Abstract Background: Although warfarin is known as effective oral anticoagulant to prevent thromboembolic events, its' narrow therapeutic index requires ambient and good follow-up to reduce its therapeutic complications. There is a continuous debate whether the best practice to accomplish this...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Osman Elsayed Osman, Rabeea Ibrahim Haroun Ismail, Rayan Khalid, Imad Fadl-Elmula*
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Knowledge E 2022-12-01
Series:Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.18502/sjms.v17i4.12548
_version_ 1828070544697720832
author Osman Elsayed Osman
Rabeea Ibrahim Haroun Ismail
Rayan Khalid
Imad Fadl-Elmula*
author_facet Osman Elsayed Osman
Rabeea Ibrahim Haroun Ismail
Rayan Khalid
Imad Fadl-Elmula*
author_sort Osman Elsayed Osman
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background: Although warfarin is known as effective oral anticoagulant to prevent thromboembolic events, its' narrow therapeutic index requires ambient and good follow-up to reduce its therapeutic complications. There is a continuous debate whether the best practice to accomplish this goal is in a specialized international normalized ratio clinic (INR-C) or in a general medical clinic (General-C). Few, if any, studies have been done in Sudan to compare the safety and efficacy of anticoagulant therapy in those clinics. Thus, the objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of anticoagulant therapy in INR-C and in General-C. Methods: This is a prospective hospital-based study where 200 patients were divided into two groups (group A and B) of 100 patients. Group A were in the INR-C at Ahmed Gasim specialized hospital and group B in the General-Cat AL-Shaab teaching hospital. The study was conducted from September 2019 to April 2020. All patients were on warfarin treatment and regular follow-ups were conducted. Demographic and clinical data were collected and analyzed statistically using SPSS version 20. Ethical approval was obtained from the ethical committee of the Sudanese Medical Specialization Board (SMSB). Results: Of the 200 patients, 118/59% were females and 82/41% were males. Target international normalized ratio (INR) for group (A) was achieved in 56% of the patients in the first visit, increased to 63% in the second visit, and 75% in the third follow-up, compared with 24% of the patients from group (B) in the initial and second follow-up visit, to 43% in the third visit (P value=0.05). Knowledge about drug and food interaction of coagulation agents was higher (91%) among patients in group (A) compared with group (B) (56%). Drug interaction awareness was found in 89% of the patients in group (A) compared with only 40% in group (B) (P value=0.05). Major bleeding was reported in 2% and 14% of the patients of group (A) and (B) respectively, whereas minor bleeding was seen in 4% of group (A) and 11% of group (B). Conclusion: The study showed that INR-C is more efficient and safer for patients on regular warfarin therapy compared with the General-C.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T00:39:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a6843260beb941a19c7a6536ed502a82
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1858-5051
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T00:39:25Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Knowledge E
record_format Article
series Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences
spelling doaj.art-a6843260beb941a19c7a6536ed502a822023-01-06T10:23:13ZengKnowledge ESudan Journal of Medical Sciences1858-50512022-12-0117447648410.18502/sjms.v17i4.12548sjms.v17i4.12548Efficacy and Safety of Warfarin Therapy: Comparison Between Specialized INR Clinic and General Medical ClinicOsman Elsayed Osman0Rabeea Ibrahim Haroun Ismail1Rayan Khalid2Imad Fadl-Elmula*3 Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Al Neelain University, Khartoum, Sudan Department of Cardiology, Ahmed Gasim Specialized Hospital, Khartoum, Sudan Department of Physiology, Assafa College, Khartoum, Sudan Department of Clinical Genetics, Assafa College, Khartoum, SudanAbstract Background: Although warfarin is known as effective oral anticoagulant to prevent thromboembolic events, its' narrow therapeutic index requires ambient and good follow-up to reduce its therapeutic complications. There is a continuous debate whether the best practice to accomplish this goal is in a specialized international normalized ratio clinic (INR-C) or in a general medical clinic (General-C). Few, if any, studies have been done in Sudan to compare the safety and efficacy of anticoagulant therapy in those clinics. Thus, the objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of anticoagulant therapy in INR-C and in General-C. Methods: This is a prospective hospital-based study where 200 patients were divided into two groups (group A and B) of 100 patients. Group A were in the INR-C at Ahmed Gasim specialized hospital and group B in the General-Cat AL-Shaab teaching hospital. The study was conducted from September 2019 to April 2020. All patients were on warfarin treatment and regular follow-ups were conducted. Demographic and clinical data were collected and analyzed statistically using SPSS version 20. Ethical approval was obtained from the ethical committee of the Sudanese Medical Specialization Board (SMSB). Results: Of the 200 patients, 118/59% were females and 82/41% were males. Target international normalized ratio (INR) for group (A) was achieved in 56% of the patients in the first visit, increased to 63% in the second visit, and 75% in the third follow-up, compared with 24% of the patients from group (B) in the initial and second follow-up visit, to 43% in the third visit (P value=0.05). Knowledge about drug and food interaction of coagulation agents was higher (91%) among patients in group (A) compared with group (B) (56%). Drug interaction awareness was found in 89% of the patients in group (A) compared with only 40% in group (B) (P value=0.05). Major bleeding was reported in 2% and 14% of the patients of group (A) and (B) respectively, whereas minor bleeding was seen in 4% of group (A) and 11% of group (B). Conclusion: The study showed that INR-C is more efficient and safer for patients on regular warfarin therapy compared with the General-C.https://doi.org/10.18502/sjms.v17i4.12548specialized inr clinic, anticoagulant therapy, warfarin
spellingShingle Osman Elsayed Osman
Rabeea Ibrahim Haroun Ismail
Rayan Khalid
Imad Fadl-Elmula*
Efficacy and Safety of Warfarin Therapy: Comparison Between Specialized INR Clinic and General Medical Clinic
Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences
specialized inr clinic, anticoagulant therapy, warfarin
title Efficacy and Safety of Warfarin Therapy: Comparison Between Specialized INR Clinic and General Medical Clinic
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Warfarin Therapy: Comparison Between Specialized INR Clinic and General Medical Clinic
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Warfarin Therapy: Comparison Between Specialized INR Clinic and General Medical Clinic
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Warfarin Therapy: Comparison Between Specialized INR Clinic and General Medical Clinic
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Warfarin Therapy: Comparison Between Specialized INR Clinic and General Medical Clinic
title_sort efficacy and safety of warfarin therapy comparison between specialized inr clinic and general medical clinic
topic specialized inr clinic, anticoagulant therapy, warfarin
url https://doi.org/10.18502/sjms.v17i4.12548
work_keys_str_mv AT osmanelsayedosman efficacyandsafetyofwarfarintherapycomparisonbetweenspecializedinrclinicandgeneralmedicalclinic
AT rabeeaibrahimharounismail efficacyandsafetyofwarfarintherapycomparisonbetweenspecializedinrclinicandgeneralmedicalclinic
AT rayankhalid efficacyandsafetyofwarfarintherapycomparisonbetweenspecializedinrclinicandgeneralmedicalclinic
AT imadfadlelmula efficacyandsafetyofwarfarintherapycomparisonbetweenspecializedinrclinicandgeneralmedicalclinic