The effect of closure versus nonclosure of lingual mucosa graft harvest site on postoperative morbidity in augmentation urethroplasty: A comparative study
Objectives: The objective of this study is to compare postoperative morbidity of closure versus nonclosure of the lingual mucosa graft (LMG) harvest site in augmentation urethroplasty. Materials and Methods: From January 2015 to November 2016, a total of 42 patients who underwent LMG urethroplasty r...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2019-01-01
|
| Series: | Urology Annals |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.urologyannals.com/article.asp?issn=0974-7796;year=2019;volume=11;issue=3;spage=265;epage=269;aulast=Gulani |
| _version_ | 1831835822061518848 |
|---|---|
| author | Anil Gulani Sher Singh Yadav Vinay Tomar Shivam Priyadarshi Vivek Kumar Singh |
| author_facet | Anil Gulani Sher Singh Yadav Vinay Tomar Shivam Priyadarshi Vivek Kumar Singh |
| author_sort | Anil Gulani |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objectives: The objective of this study is to compare postoperative morbidity of closure versus nonclosure of the lingual mucosa graft (LMG) harvest site in augmentation urethroplasty.
Materials and Methods: From January 2015 to November 2016, a total of 42 patients who underwent LMG urethroplasty randomized in 2 groups. In Group 1, donor-harvesting site was left open while in Group 2, donor site was closed. Self-made questionnaires were to assess postoperative pain, difficulty in tongue protrusion, swelling and numbness in graft harvest site, speech impairment, and difficulty in tolerating liquid and regular diet.
Results: Mean visual analog scales score was 7.1 in Group 1, and 7.9 in Group 2 on day 0, which was statistically significant. Nearly 90.47% of patients in closure group and 95.23% in nonclosure group were able to swallow liquid diet on day 0 (P = 0.5604). On day 3, 95.71% of patients in Group 1 and 80% in Group 2 were able to swallow soft diet (P = 0.1604). Numbness was present in 80.95% Group 1 and 71.42% in Group 2 on day 0, which improved to 28.57% pts in Group 1 and 33.33% in Group 2 on day 3. On day 3, slurring of speech was more frequent in closure group (80%). However, at the end of a week, there was no difference in both groups. Saliva production was significantly increased in Group 1 in the 1st week.
Conclusion: Long-term morbidities of closing or nonclosing the LMG donor site are similar, but in short term, there is less pain, less edema, early recovery of tongue movements in nonclosure groups. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-23T04:45:08Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-a68808e7efa649b99748c3848908ce40 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0974-7796 0974-7834 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-23T04:45:08Z |
| publishDate | 2019-01-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Urology Annals |
| spelling | doaj.art-a68808e7efa649b99748c3848908ce402022-12-21T17:59:41ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsUrology Annals0974-77960974-78342019-01-0111326526910.4103/UA.UA_142_17The effect of closure versus nonclosure of lingual mucosa graft harvest site on postoperative morbidity in augmentation urethroplasty: A comparative studyAnil GulaniSher Singh YadavVinay TomarShivam PriyadarshiVivek Kumar SinghObjectives: The objective of this study is to compare postoperative morbidity of closure versus nonclosure of the lingual mucosa graft (LMG) harvest site in augmentation urethroplasty. Materials and Methods: From January 2015 to November 2016, a total of 42 patients who underwent LMG urethroplasty randomized in 2 groups. In Group 1, donor-harvesting site was left open while in Group 2, donor site was closed. Self-made questionnaires were to assess postoperative pain, difficulty in tongue protrusion, swelling and numbness in graft harvest site, speech impairment, and difficulty in tolerating liquid and regular diet. Results: Mean visual analog scales score was 7.1 in Group 1, and 7.9 in Group 2 on day 0, which was statistically significant. Nearly 90.47% of patients in closure group and 95.23% in nonclosure group were able to swallow liquid diet on day 0 (P = 0.5604). On day 3, 95.71% of patients in Group 1 and 80% in Group 2 were able to swallow soft diet (P = 0.1604). Numbness was present in 80.95% Group 1 and 71.42% in Group 2 on day 0, which improved to 28.57% pts in Group 1 and 33.33% in Group 2 on day 3. On day 3, slurring of speech was more frequent in closure group (80%). However, at the end of a week, there was no difference in both groups. Saliva production was significantly increased in Group 1 in the 1st week. Conclusion: Long-term morbidities of closing or nonclosing the LMG donor site are similar, but in short term, there is less pain, less edema, early recovery of tongue movements in nonclosure groups.http://www.urologyannals.com/article.asp?issn=0974-7796;year=2019;volume=11;issue=3;spage=265;epage=269;aulast=GulaniAugmentation urethroplastydonor sitelingual mucosaopen versus closed |
| spellingShingle | Anil Gulani Sher Singh Yadav Vinay Tomar Shivam Priyadarshi Vivek Kumar Singh The effect of closure versus nonclosure of lingual mucosa graft harvest site on postoperative morbidity in augmentation urethroplasty: A comparative study Urology Annals Augmentation urethroplasty donor site lingual mucosa open versus closed |
| title | The effect of closure versus nonclosure of lingual mucosa graft harvest site on postoperative morbidity in augmentation urethroplasty: A comparative study |
| title_full | The effect of closure versus nonclosure of lingual mucosa graft harvest site on postoperative morbidity in augmentation urethroplasty: A comparative study |
| title_fullStr | The effect of closure versus nonclosure of lingual mucosa graft harvest site on postoperative morbidity in augmentation urethroplasty: A comparative study |
| title_full_unstemmed | The effect of closure versus nonclosure of lingual mucosa graft harvest site on postoperative morbidity in augmentation urethroplasty: A comparative study |
| title_short | The effect of closure versus nonclosure of lingual mucosa graft harvest site on postoperative morbidity in augmentation urethroplasty: A comparative study |
| title_sort | effect of closure versus nonclosure of lingual mucosa graft harvest site on postoperative morbidity in augmentation urethroplasty a comparative study |
| topic | Augmentation urethroplasty donor site lingual mucosa open versus closed |
| url | http://www.urologyannals.com/article.asp?issn=0974-7796;year=2019;volume=11;issue=3;spage=265;epage=269;aulast=Gulani |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT anilgulani theeffectofclosureversusnonclosureoflingualmucosagraftharvestsiteonpostoperativemorbidityinaugmentationurethroplastyacomparativestudy AT shersinghyadav theeffectofclosureversusnonclosureoflingualmucosagraftharvestsiteonpostoperativemorbidityinaugmentationurethroplastyacomparativestudy AT vinaytomar theeffectofclosureversusnonclosureoflingualmucosagraftharvestsiteonpostoperativemorbidityinaugmentationurethroplastyacomparativestudy AT shivampriyadarshi theeffectofclosureversusnonclosureoflingualmucosagraftharvestsiteonpostoperativemorbidityinaugmentationurethroplastyacomparativestudy AT vivekkumarsingh theeffectofclosureversusnonclosureoflingualmucosagraftharvestsiteonpostoperativemorbidityinaugmentationurethroplastyacomparativestudy AT anilgulani effectofclosureversusnonclosureoflingualmucosagraftharvestsiteonpostoperativemorbidityinaugmentationurethroplastyacomparativestudy AT shersinghyadav effectofclosureversusnonclosureoflingualmucosagraftharvestsiteonpostoperativemorbidityinaugmentationurethroplastyacomparativestudy AT vinaytomar effectofclosureversusnonclosureoflingualmucosagraftharvestsiteonpostoperativemorbidityinaugmentationurethroplastyacomparativestudy AT shivampriyadarshi effectofclosureversusnonclosureoflingualmucosagraftharvestsiteonpostoperativemorbidityinaugmentationurethroplastyacomparativestudy AT vivekkumarsingh effectofclosureversusnonclosureoflingualmucosagraftharvestsiteonpostoperativemorbidityinaugmentationurethroplastyacomparativestudy |