A comparison of CMIP5 and CMIP6 climate model projections for hydrological impacts in China

Global climate model (GCM) outputs from Coupled Model Inter-comparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) were widely used to investigate climate change impacts last 10 years. It is important to know whether Coupled Model Inter-comparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) is more reliable than CMIP5. Number of studies c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yawen Lei, Jie Chen, Lihua Xiong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IWA Publishing 2023-03-01
Series:Hydrology Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hr.iwaponline.com/content/54/3/330
_version_ 1797851255151788032
author Yawen Lei
Jie Chen
Lihua Xiong
author_facet Yawen Lei
Jie Chen
Lihua Xiong
author_sort Yawen Lei
collection DOAJ
description Global climate model (GCM) outputs from Coupled Model Inter-comparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) were widely used to investigate climate change impacts last 10 years. It is important to know whether Coupled Model Inter-comparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) is more reliable than CMIP5. Number of studies compared GCMs from two CMIPs in simulating climate variables, but they are not in the field of hydrology for large quantities of watersheds. The objective of this study is to compare CMIP5 and CMIP6 climate model projections in projecting hydrological changes between future (2071–2100) and historical (1976–2005) periods and inter-model variability of hydrological impacts for the future period over 343 catchments in China's mainland. The results show that the GCMs in CMIP6 show more increase in daily mean temperature and mean annual precipitation. However, GCMs in CMIP6 and CMIP5 show similar increases in mean and peak streamflow. Moreover, GCMs in CMIP6 show less inter-model variability for streamflow in southern and northeastern China, but more in central China, which is consistent to that for precipitation after bias correction. Overall, this comparison provides the consistency of future change and uncertainty in predicted streamflow with climate simulations, which bring confidence for hydrological impact studies using CMIP6. HIGHLIGHTS GCMs in CMIP6 under SSP5-85 show more increase in temperature and precipitation than those in CMIP5 under RCP8.5 in China.; GCMs in CMIP6 and CMIP5 show similar increases in mean and peak streamflow.; GCMs in CMIP6 show less inter-model variability for mean and peak flow in southern and northeastern China, but more in central China.;
first_indexed 2024-04-09T19:14:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a69118ea583f4e869fb09be451534cec
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1998-9563
2224-7955
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T19:14:54Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher IWA Publishing
record_format Article
series Hydrology Research
spelling doaj.art-a69118ea583f4e869fb09be451534cec2023-04-06T07:30:07ZengIWA PublishingHydrology Research1998-95632224-79552023-03-0154333034710.2166/nh.2023.108108A comparison of CMIP5 and CMIP6 climate model projections for hydrological impacts in ChinaYawen Lei0Jie Chen1Lihua Xiong2 State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China Global climate model (GCM) outputs from Coupled Model Inter-comparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) were widely used to investigate climate change impacts last 10 years. It is important to know whether Coupled Model Inter-comparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) is more reliable than CMIP5. Number of studies compared GCMs from two CMIPs in simulating climate variables, but they are not in the field of hydrology for large quantities of watersheds. The objective of this study is to compare CMIP5 and CMIP6 climate model projections in projecting hydrological changes between future (2071–2100) and historical (1976–2005) periods and inter-model variability of hydrological impacts for the future period over 343 catchments in China's mainland. The results show that the GCMs in CMIP6 show more increase in daily mean temperature and mean annual precipitation. However, GCMs in CMIP6 and CMIP5 show similar increases in mean and peak streamflow. Moreover, GCMs in CMIP6 show less inter-model variability for streamflow in southern and northeastern China, but more in central China, which is consistent to that for precipitation after bias correction. Overall, this comparison provides the consistency of future change and uncertainty in predicted streamflow with climate simulations, which bring confidence for hydrological impact studies using CMIP6. HIGHLIGHTS GCMs in CMIP6 under SSP5-85 show more increase in temperature and precipitation than those in CMIP5 under RCP8.5 in China.; GCMs in CMIP6 and CMIP5 show similar increases in mean and peak streamflow.; GCMs in CMIP6 show less inter-model variability for mean and peak flow in southern and northeastern China, but more in central China.;http://hr.iwaponline.com/content/54/3/330climate changecmip5cmip6gcmhydrological impactsvariability
spellingShingle Yawen Lei
Jie Chen
Lihua Xiong
A comparison of CMIP5 and CMIP6 climate model projections for hydrological impacts in China
Hydrology Research
climate change
cmip5
cmip6
gcm
hydrological impacts
variability
title A comparison of CMIP5 and CMIP6 climate model projections for hydrological impacts in China
title_full A comparison of CMIP5 and CMIP6 climate model projections for hydrological impacts in China
title_fullStr A comparison of CMIP5 and CMIP6 climate model projections for hydrological impacts in China
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of CMIP5 and CMIP6 climate model projections for hydrological impacts in China
title_short A comparison of CMIP5 and CMIP6 climate model projections for hydrological impacts in China
title_sort comparison of cmip5 and cmip6 climate model projections for hydrological impacts in china
topic climate change
cmip5
cmip6
gcm
hydrological impacts
variability
url http://hr.iwaponline.com/content/54/3/330
work_keys_str_mv AT yawenlei acomparisonofcmip5andcmip6climatemodelprojectionsforhydrologicalimpactsinchina
AT jiechen acomparisonofcmip5andcmip6climatemodelprojectionsforhydrologicalimpactsinchina
AT lihuaxiong acomparisonofcmip5andcmip6climatemodelprojectionsforhydrologicalimpactsinchina
AT yawenlei comparisonofcmip5andcmip6climatemodelprojectionsforhydrologicalimpactsinchina
AT jiechen comparisonofcmip5andcmip6climatemodelprojectionsforhydrologicalimpactsinchina
AT lihuaxiong comparisonofcmip5andcmip6climatemodelprojectionsforhydrologicalimpactsinchina