Remarques critiques sur l’historiographie des Choctaw
Patricia Galloway’s historical work on the Choctaw of the Southeastern United States has mainly focused on their coalescent dynamic as a people. In such ethnogenetic perspective, it is commonly assumed that regional subdivisions of the Choctaw in the 18th century trace back to ancient ethnical bound...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Société des américanistes
2019-06-01
|
| Series: | Journal de la Société des Américanistes |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/jsa/16953 |
| _version_ | 1797997073417633792 |
|---|---|
| author | Benjamin Balloy |
| author_facet | Benjamin Balloy |
| author_sort | Benjamin Balloy |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Patricia Galloway’s historical work on the Choctaw of the Southeastern United States has mainly focused on their coalescent dynamic as a people. In such ethnogenetic perspective, it is commonly assumed that regional subdivisions of the Choctaw in the 18th century trace back to ancient ethnical boundaries. Furthering the “multiethnic confederacy” hypothesis, Greg O’Brien recently promoted the idea that the conflict of 1748-1750, between a so-called “pro-French” and a so-called “pro-British” faction among the Choctaw, could be analyzed as the persistent effect of such ethnogenesis. This article, through a close examination of early 18th century documentary evidence, questions these lines and calls for a better apreciation of the sociological aspects of such segmentation. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T10:27:16Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-a69bc9c9831f4acda97fe71c6d9fb36b |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0037-9174 1957-7842 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T10:27:16Z |
| publishDate | 2019-06-01 |
| publisher | Société des américanistes |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal de la Société des Américanistes |
| spelling | doaj.art-a69bc9c9831f4acda97fe71c6d9fb36b2022-12-22T04:29:33ZengSociété des américanistesJournal de la Société des Américanistes0037-91741957-78422019-06-0110519712210.4000/jsa.16953Remarques critiques sur l’historiographie des ChoctawBenjamin BalloyPatricia Galloway’s historical work on the Choctaw of the Southeastern United States has mainly focused on their coalescent dynamic as a people. In such ethnogenetic perspective, it is commonly assumed that regional subdivisions of the Choctaw in the 18th century trace back to ancient ethnical boundaries. Furthering the “multiethnic confederacy” hypothesis, Greg O’Brien recently promoted the idea that the conflict of 1748-1750, between a so-called “pro-French” and a so-called “pro-British” faction among the Choctaw, could be analyzed as the persistent effect of such ethnogenesis. This article, through a close examination of early 18th century documentary evidence, questions these lines and calls for a better apreciation of the sociological aspects of such segmentation.http://journals.openedition.org/jsa/16953ethnogenesisChoctawethnohistorydualism (social organization)segmentation18th century |
| spellingShingle | Benjamin Balloy Remarques critiques sur l’historiographie des Choctaw Journal de la Société des Américanistes ethnogenesis Choctaw ethnohistory dualism (social organization) segmentation 18th century |
| title | Remarques critiques sur l’historiographie des Choctaw |
| title_full | Remarques critiques sur l’historiographie des Choctaw |
| title_fullStr | Remarques critiques sur l’historiographie des Choctaw |
| title_full_unstemmed | Remarques critiques sur l’historiographie des Choctaw |
| title_short | Remarques critiques sur l’historiographie des Choctaw |
| title_sort | remarques critiques sur l historiographie des choctaw |
| topic | ethnogenesis Choctaw ethnohistory dualism (social organization) segmentation 18th century |
| url | http://journals.openedition.org/jsa/16953 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT benjaminballoy remarquescritiquessurlhistoriographiedeschoctaw |