Biomechanical comparative analysis of conventional pedicle screws and cortical bone trajectory fixation in the lumbar spine: An in vitro and finite element study
Numerous screw fixation systems have evolved in clinical practice as a result of advances in screw insertion technology. Currently, pedicle screw (PS) fixation technology is recognized as the gold standard of posterior lumbar fusion, but it can also have some negative complications, such as screw lo...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023-01-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1060059/full |
_version_ | 1828059273929687040 |
---|---|
author | Baoqing Pei Yangyang Xu Yafei Zhao Xueqing Wu Da Lu Haiyan Wang Shuqin Wu |
author_facet | Baoqing Pei Yangyang Xu Yafei Zhao Xueqing Wu Da Lu Haiyan Wang Shuqin Wu |
author_sort | Baoqing Pei |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Numerous screw fixation systems have evolved in clinical practice as a result of advances in screw insertion technology. Currently, pedicle screw (PS) fixation technology is recognized as the gold standard of posterior lumbar fusion, but it can also have some negative complications, such as screw loosening, pullout, and breakage. To address these concerns, cortical bone trajectory (CBT) has been proposed and gradually developed. However, it is still unclear whether cortical bone trajectory can achieve similar mechanical stability to pedicle screw and whether the combination of pedicle screw + cortical bone trajectory fixation can provide a suitable mechanical environment in the intervertebral space. The present study aimed to investigate the biomechanical responses of the lumbar spine with pedicle screw and cortical bone trajectory fixation. Accordingly, finite element analysis (FEA) and in vitro specimen biomechanical experiment (IVE) were performed to analyze the stiffness, range of motion (ROM), and stress distribution of the lumbar spine with various combinations of pedicle screw and cortical bone trajectory screws under single-segment and dual-segment fixation. The results show that dual-segment fixation and hybrid screw placement can provide greater stiffness, which is beneficial for maintaining the biomechanical stability of the spine. Meanwhile, each segment’s range of motion is reduced after fusion, and the loss of adjacent segments’ range of motion is more obvious with longer fusion segments, thereby leading to adjacent-segment disease (ASD). Long-segment internal fixation can equalize total spinal stresses. Additionally, cortical bone trajectory screws perform better in terms of the rotation resistance of fusion segments, while pedicle screw screws perform better in terms of flexion–extension resistance, as well as lateral bending. Moreover, the maximum screw stress of L4 cortical bone trajectory/L5 pedicle screw is the highest, followed by L45 cortical bone trajectory. This biomechanical analysis can accordingly provide inspiration for the choice of intervertebral fusion strategy. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-10T21:39:29Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-a6b3e7aed4a44de594796b73ec30de60 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2296-4185 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-10T21:39:29Z |
publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology |
spelling | doaj.art-a6b3e7aed4a44de594796b73ec30de602023-01-19T06:41:59ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology2296-41852023-01-011110.3389/fbioe.2023.10600591060059Biomechanical comparative analysis of conventional pedicle screws and cortical bone trajectory fixation in the lumbar spine: An in vitro and finite element studyBaoqing Pei0Yangyang Xu1Yafei Zhao2Xueqing Wu3Da Lu4Haiyan Wang5Shuqin Wu6Beijing key laboratory for design and evaluation technology of advanced implantable & interventional medical devices, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, ChinaBeijing key laboratory for design and evaluation technology of advanced implantable & interventional medical devices, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, ChinaAerospace center hospital, Beijing, ChinaBeijing key laboratory for design and evaluation technology of advanced implantable & interventional medical devices, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, ChinaBeijing key laboratory for design and evaluation technology of advanced implantable & interventional medical devices, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, ChinaSchool of Basic Medicine, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, ChinaSchool of Big Data and Information, Shanxi College of Technology, Shanxi, ChinaNumerous screw fixation systems have evolved in clinical practice as a result of advances in screw insertion technology. Currently, pedicle screw (PS) fixation technology is recognized as the gold standard of posterior lumbar fusion, but it can also have some negative complications, such as screw loosening, pullout, and breakage. To address these concerns, cortical bone trajectory (CBT) has been proposed and gradually developed. However, it is still unclear whether cortical bone trajectory can achieve similar mechanical stability to pedicle screw and whether the combination of pedicle screw + cortical bone trajectory fixation can provide a suitable mechanical environment in the intervertebral space. The present study aimed to investigate the biomechanical responses of the lumbar spine with pedicle screw and cortical bone trajectory fixation. Accordingly, finite element analysis (FEA) and in vitro specimen biomechanical experiment (IVE) were performed to analyze the stiffness, range of motion (ROM), and stress distribution of the lumbar spine with various combinations of pedicle screw and cortical bone trajectory screws under single-segment and dual-segment fixation. The results show that dual-segment fixation and hybrid screw placement can provide greater stiffness, which is beneficial for maintaining the biomechanical stability of the spine. Meanwhile, each segment’s range of motion is reduced after fusion, and the loss of adjacent segments’ range of motion is more obvious with longer fusion segments, thereby leading to adjacent-segment disease (ASD). Long-segment internal fixation can equalize total spinal stresses. Additionally, cortical bone trajectory screws perform better in terms of the rotation resistance of fusion segments, while pedicle screw screws perform better in terms of flexion–extension resistance, as well as lateral bending. Moreover, the maximum screw stress of L4 cortical bone trajectory/L5 pedicle screw is the highest, followed by L45 cortical bone trajectory. This biomechanical analysis can accordingly provide inspiration for the choice of intervertebral fusion strategy.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1060059/fullbiomechanical phenomenafinite element analysisbiomechanical testscortical bone trajectory screwspedicle screwshybrid screw strategy |
spellingShingle | Baoqing Pei Yangyang Xu Yafei Zhao Xueqing Wu Da Lu Haiyan Wang Shuqin Wu Biomechanical comparative analysis of conventional pedicle screws and cortical bone trajectory fixation in the lumbar spine: An in vitro and finite element study Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology biomechanical phenomena finite element analysis biomechanical tests cortical bone trajectory screws pedicle screws hybrid screw strategy |
title | Biomechanical comparative analysis of conventional pedicle screws and cortical bone trajectory fixation in the lumbar spine: An in vitro and finite element study |
title_full | Biomechanical comparative analysis of conventional pedicle screws and cortical bone trajectory fixation in the lumbar spine: An in vitro and finite element study |
title_fullStr | Biomechanical comparative analysis of conventional pedicle screws and cortical bone trajectory fixation in the lumbar spine: An in vitro and finite element study |
title_full_unstemmed | Biomechanical comparative analysis of conventional pedicle screws and cortical bone trajectory fixation in the lumbar spine: An in vitro and finite element study |
title_short | Biomechanical comparative analysis of conventional pedicle screws and cortical bone trajectory fixation in the lumbar spine: An in vitro and finite element study |
title_sort | biomechanical comparative analysis of conventional pedicle screws and cortical bone trajectory fixation in the lumbar spine an in vitro and finite element study |
topic | biomechanical phenomena finite element analysis biomechanical tests cortical bone trajectory screws pedicle screws hybrid screw strategy |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1060059/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baoqingpei biomechanicalcomparativeanalysisofconventionalpediclescrewsandcorticalbonetrajectoryfixationinthelumbarspineaninvitroandfiniteelementstudy AT yangyangxu biomechanicalcomparativeanalysisofconventionalpediclescrewsandcorticalbonetrajectoryfixationinthelumbarspineaninvitroandfiniteelementstudy AT yafeizhao biomechanicalcomparativeanalysisofconventionalpediclescrewsandcorticalbonetrajectoryfixationinthelumbarspineaninvitroandfiniteelementstudy AT xueqingwu biomechanicalcomparativeanalysisofconventionalpediclescrewsandcorticalbonetrajectoryfixationinthelumbarspineaninvitroandfiniteelementstudy AT dalu biomechanicalcomparativeanalysisofconventionalpediclescrewsandcorticalbonetrajectoryfixationinthelumbarspineaninvitroandfiniteelementstudy AT haiyanwang biomechanicalcomparativeanalysisofconventionalpediclescrewsandcorticalbonetrajectoryfixationinthelumbarspineaninvitroandfiniteelementstudy AT shuqinwu biomechanicalcomparativeanalysisofconventionalpediclescrewsandcorticalbonetrajectoryfixationinthelumbarspineaninvitroandfiniteelementstudy |