A Risk Assessment of the Jaffe vs Enzymatic Method for Creatinine Measurement in an Outpatient Population.
<h4>Background</h4>The Jaffe and enzymatic methods are the two most common methods for measuring serum creatinine. The Jaffe method is less expensive than the enzymatic method but is also more susceptible to interferences. Interferences can lead to misdiagnosis but interferences may vary...
Main Authors: | Robert L Schmidt, Joely A Straseski, Kalani L Raphael, Austin H Adams, Christopher M Lehman |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2015-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143205 |
Similar Items
-
To compare creatinine estimation by jaffe and enzymatic method
by: Sahaya Merina Augustin, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01) -
LC-MS/MS Method for Serum Creatinine: Comparison with Enzymatic Method and Jaffe Method.
by: Meixian Ou, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01) -
Comparing Jaffe and Enzymatic Methods for Creatinine Measurement at Various Icterus Levels and Their Impacts on Liver Transplant Allocation
by: Neda Soleimani, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01) -
Approach to overcome the bilirubin interference in the estimation of serum creatinine by Jaffe’s method
by: C.N. Shruthi, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01) -
Clinical evaluation of analytical variations in serum creatinine measurements: why laboratories should abandon Jaffe techniques
by: Drion Iefke, et al.
Published: (2012-10-01)