Clinical outcomes of a percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis – A tertiary center experience

Background: In surgically high-risk patients with acute cholecystitis (AC), percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) is an effective procedure. This study aimed to study the clinical outcomes of PC and to assess predictors for recurrence following PC placement. Methodology: A retrospective data review of a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nitin Paul Ambrose, Samuel Joseph Arthur, Anoop Paul, K Senthilnathan, Negine Paul, Beulah Roopavathana, Suchita Chase, Bijesh Yadav, Antony Augustine
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2023-01-01
Series:Current Medical Issues
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.cmijournal.org/article.asp?issn=0973-4651;year=2023;volume=21;issue=4;spage=201;epage=207;aulast=Ambrose
_version_ 1827270191773384704
author Nitin Paul Ambrose
Samuel Joseph Arthur
Anoop Paul
K Senthilnathan
Negine Paul
Beulah Roopavathana
Suchita Chase
Bijesh Yadav
Antony Augustine
author_facet Nitin Paul Ambrose
Samuel Joseph Arthur
Anoop Paul
K Senthilnathan
Negine Paul
Beulah Roopavathana
Suchita Chase
Bijesh Yadav
Antony Augustine
author_sort Nitin Paul Ambrose
collection DOAJ
description Background: In surgically high-risk patients with acute cholecystitis (AC), percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) is an effective procedure. This study aimed to study the clinical outcomes of PC and to assess predictors for recurrence following PC placement. Methodology: A retrospective data review of all patients who underwent a PC for AC between 2010 and 2020 was performed. Results: Seventy-one patients underwent a PC with a mean age of 61.35 years (standard deviation: 14.11); 59 (83.1%) were male; 32 (45.1%) were the American Society of Anesthesiologists III and IV. Forty (56.3%) patients had multiple comorbid illnesses; 70 (98.6%) patients had Grade 2, 3 cholecystitis. All patients had ultrasound-guided drainage; 63 (88.7%) had transhepatic route. The mean duration till PC removal was 51.58 (1–313) days. Eleven (15.5%) patients developed recurrence after PC placement over a median of 40 (29–102) days; 6 (54.5%) were managed nonoperatively, 3 (27%) underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and 2 (18%) developed cholangitis. After index admission with AC managed by PC, thirty-nine (54.9%) patients underwent cholecystectomy; 4(5.6%) at the index admission, 35 (49.3%) elective interval cholecystectomies. The rate of conversion to open at interval cholecystectomy among patients with no recurrence in the interval period was 31.88% (7/22), and 50% for patients with recurrent AC. Five (7.04%) patients had mortality at the index admission, and the overall 1-year mortality was 8.45% (6/71). Conclusion: A high clinical success rate and less procedure-related morbidity make PC a favorable procedure in surgically high-risk patients. Patients with a recurrent episode of AC were found to have higher rates of conversion at interval cholecystectomy. No specific predictor for recurrence was identified.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T13:12:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a6d0d66b560449c080c16189fb7ce494
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0973-4651
2666-4054
language English
last_indexed 2025-03-22T05:17:31Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Current Medical Issues
spelling doaj.art-a6d0d66b560449c080c16189fb7ce4942024-04-27T04:46:19ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsCurrent Medical Issues0973-46512666-40542023-01-0121420120710.4103/cmi.cmi_54_23Clinical outcomes of a percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis – A tertiary center experienceNitin Paul AmbroseSamuel Joseph ArthurAnoop PaulK SenthilnathanNegine PaulBeulah RoopavathanaSuchita ChaseBijesh YadavAntony AugustineBackground: In surgically high-risk patients with acute cholecystitis (AC), percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) is an effective procedure. This study aimed to study the clinical outcomes of PC and to assess predictors for recurrence following PC placement. Methodology: A retrospective data review of all patients who underwent a PC for AC between 2010 and 2020 was performed. Results: Seventy-one patients underwent a PC with a mean age of 61.35 years (standard deviation: 14.11); 59 (83.1%) were male; 32 (45.1%) were the American Society of Anesthesiologists III and IV. Forty (56.3%) patients had multiple comorbid illnesses; 70 (98.6%) patients had Grade 2, 3 cholecystitis. All patients had ultrasound-guided drainage; 63 (88.7%) had transhepatic route. The mean duration till PC removal was 51.58 (1–313) days. Eleven (15.5%) patients developed recurrence after PC placement over a median of 40 (29–102) days; 6 (54.5%) were managed nonoperatively, 3 (27%) underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and 2 (18%) developed cholangitis. After index admission with AC managed by PC, thirty-nine (54.9%) patients underwent cholecystectomy; 4(5.6%) at the index admission, 35 (49.3%) elective interval cholecystectomies. The rate of conversion to open at interval cholecystectomy among patients with no recurrence in the interval period was 31.88% (7/22), and 50% for patients with recurrent AC. Five (7.04%) patients had mortality at the index admission, and the overall 1-year mortality was 8.45% (6/71). Conclusion: A high clinical success rate and less procedure-related morbidity make PC a favorable procedure in surgically high-risk patients. Patients with a recurrent episode of AC were found to have higher rates of conversion at interval cholecystectomy. No specific predictor for recurrence was identified.http://www.cmijournal.org/article.asp?issn=0973-4651;year=2023;volume=21;issue=4;spage=201;epage=207;aulast=Ambrosebiliarycholecystectomycholecystitischolecystostomy
spellingShingle Nitin Paul Ambrose
Samuel Joseph Arthur
Anoop Paul
K Senthilnathan
Negine Paul
Beulah Roopavathana
Suchita Chase
Bijesh Yadav
Antony Augustine
Clinical outcomes of a percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis – A tertiary center experience
Current Medical Issues
biliary
cholecystectomy
cholecystitis
cholecystostomy
title Clinical outcomes of a percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis – A tertiary center experience
title_full Clinical outcomes of a percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis – A tertiary center experience
title_fullStr Clinical outcomes of a percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis – A tertiary center experience
title_full_unstemmed Clinical outcomes of a percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis – A tertiary center experience
title_short Clinical outcomes of a percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis – A tertiary center experience
title_sort clinical outcomes of a percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis a tertiary center experience
topic biliary
cholecystectomy
cholecystitis
cholecystostomy
url http://www.cmijournal.org/article.asp?issn=0973-4651;year=2023;volume=21;issue=4;spage=201;epage=207;aulast=Ambrose
work_keys_str_mv AT nitinpaulambrose clinicaloutcomesofapercutaneouscholecystostomyforacutecholecystitisatertiarycenterexperience
AT samueljosepharthur clinicaloutcomesofapercutaneouscholecystostomyforacutecholecystitisatertiarycenterexperience
AT anooppaul clinicaloutcomesofapercutaneouscholecystostomyforacutecholecystitisatertiarycenterexperience
AT ksenthilnathan clinicaloutcomesofapercutaneouscholecystostomyforacutecholecystitisatertiarycenterexperience
AT neginepaul clinicaloutcomesofapercutaneouscholecystostomyforacutecholecystitisatertiarycenterexperience
AT beulahroopavathana clinicaloutcomesofapercutaneouscholecystostomyforacutecholecystitisatertiarycenterexperience
AT suchitachase clinicaloutcomesofapercutaneouscholecystostomyforacutecholecystitisatertiarycenterexperience
AT bijeshyadav clinicaloutcomesofapercutaneouscholecystostomyforacutecholecystitisatertiarycenterexperience
AT antonyaugustine clinicaloutcomesofapercutaneouscholecystostomyforacutecholecystitisatertiarycenterexperience