Free Listening

Given the widespread ideological polarization of the current times, cultivating ways to empathize across difference has never been more important. In this essay, we outline Free Listening (FL), a pedagogical practice that helps people grow their capacity to empathetically engage others across differ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kyle A. Hanners, Cristopher J. Tietsort
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Indiana University Office of Scholarly Publishing 2021-12-01
Series:Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/josotl/article/view/32707
_version_ 1818773712895213568
author Kyle A. Hanners
Cristopher J. Tietsort
author_facet Kyle A. Hanners
Cristopher J. Tietsort
author_sort Kyle A. Hanners
collection DOAJ
description Given the widespread ideological polarization of the current times, cultivating ways to empathize across difference has never been more important. In this essay, we outline Free Listening (FL), a pedagogical practice that helps people grow their capacity to empathetically engage others across difference by engaging in structured sessions of active empathetic listening. Our prior work demonstrates that the structured practice of FL has both affective and practical implications for how students engage with others; students leave the practice with a greater sense of awareness, appreciation for other cultures, and ability to listen across cultural and ideological boundaries. We believe FL has great promise within the teaching-and-learning process in relation to civic and community engagement, service learning, and relational praxis. In this essay, we outline the practice of FL and review literature that helps elucidate what this practice is and does. Some key themes are discussed that reveal the valuable contributions of this practice as they have emerged from our students’ and our own experience with/in FL. Finally, we trace the pedagogical implications of FL as they connect to theories of dialogue and dialogic praxis. Overall, we argue that FL should be a regular practice for pedagogues across the social sciences in order to cultivate in students the relational and empathetic skills that are needed to advance the project of depolarization—a project in which other-centeredness should be a defining feature.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T10:29:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a6d5ecabce4d4db998b9efb4a7b1d62f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1527-9316
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T10:29:37Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher Indiana University Office of Scholarly Publishing
record_format Article
series Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
spelling doaj.art-a6d5ecabce4d4db998b9efb4a7b1d62f2022-12-21T21:10:54ZengIndiana University Office of Scholarly PublishingJournal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning1527-93162021-12-01214Free ListeningKyle A. Hanners0Cristopher J. TietsortArizona State UniversityGiven the widespread ideological polarization of the current times, cultivating ways to empathize across difference has never been more important. In this essay, we outline Free Listening (FL), a pedagogical practice that helps people grow their capacity to empathetically engage others across difference by engaging in structured sessions of active empathetic listening. Our prior work demonstrates that the structured practice of FL has both affective and practical implications for how students engage with others; students leave the practice with a greater sense of awareness, appreciation for other cultures, and ability to listen across cultural and ideological boundaries. We believe FL has great promise within the teaching-and-learning process in relation to civic and community engagement, service learning, and relational praxis. In this essay, we outline the practice of FL and review literature that helps elucidate what this practice is and does. Some key themes are discussed that reveal the valuable contributions of this practice as they have emerged from our students’ and our own experience with/in FL. Finally, we trace the pedagogical implications of FL as they connect to theories of dialogue and dialogic praxis. Overall, we argue that FL should be a regular practice for pedagogues across the social sciences in order to cultivate in students the relational and empathetic skills that are needed to advance the project of depolarization—a project in which other-centeredness should be a defining feature.https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/josotl/article/view/32707listeningdialogueempathyFree Listeningactivism
spellingShingle Kyle A. Hanners
Cristopher J. Tietsort
Free Listening
Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
listening
dialogue
empathy
Free Listening
activism
title Free Listening
title_full Free Listening
title_fullStr Free Listening
title_full_unstemmed Free Listening
title_short Free Listening
title_sort free listening
topic listening
dialogue
empathy
Free Listening
activism
url https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/josotl/article/view/32707
work_keys_str_mv AT kyleahanners freelistening
AT cristopherjtietsort freelistening