Does dentine mineral change with anatomical location, microscopic site and patient age?

Objective: To determine the effect of patient age (young or mature), anatomical location (shallow/deep and central/peripheral) and microscopic site (intertubular/peritubular) on dentine mineral density, distribution and composition. Methods: Extracted posterior teeth from young (aged 19–20 years, N ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Arosha T. Weerakoon, Crystal Cooper, Ian A. Meyers, Nicholas Condon, Christopher Sexton, David Thomson, Pauline J. Ford, Anne L. Symons
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-01-01
Series:Journal of Structural Biology: X
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590152422000010
_version_ 1811178589202153472
author Arosha T. Weerakoon
Crystal Cooper
Ian A. Meyers
Nicholas Condon
Christopher Sexton
David Thomson
Pauline J. Ford
Anne L. Symons
author_facet Arosha T. Weerakoon
Crystal Cooper
Ian A. Meyers
Nicholas Condon
Christopher Sexton
David Thomson
Pauline J. Ford
Anne L. Symons
author_sort Arosha T. Weerakoon
collection DOAJ
description Objective: To determine the effect of patient age (young or mature), anatomical location (shallow/deep and central/peripheral) and microscopic site (intertubular/peritubular) on dentine mineral density, distribution and composition. Methods: Extracted posterior teeth from young (aged 19–20 years, N = 4) and mature (aged 54–77 years, N = 4) subjects were prepared to shallow and deep slices. The dentine surface elemental composition was investigated in a SEM using Backscattered Electron (BSE) micrographs, Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy, and Integrated Mineral Analysis. Qualitative comparisons and quantitative measures using machine learning were used to analyse the BSE images. Quantitative outcomes were compared using quantile or linear regression models with bootstrapping to account for the multiple measures per sample. Subsequently, a Xenon Plasma Focussed Ion Beam Scanning Electron Microscopy (Xe PFIB-SEM) was used to mill large area (100 µm) cross-sections to investigate morphology through the dentine tubules using high resolution secondary electron micrographs. Results: With age, dentine mineral composition remains stable, but density changes with anatomical location and microscopic site. Microscopically, accessory tubules spread into intertubular dentine (ITD) from the main tubule lumens. Within the lumens, mineral deposits form calcospherites in the young that eventually coalesce in mature tubules and branches. The mineral occlusion in mature dentine increases overall ITD density to reflect peritubular dentine (PTD) infiltrate. The ITD observed in micrographs remained consistent for age and observation plane to suggest tubule deposition affects overall dentine density. Mineral density depends on the relative distribution of PTD to ITD that varies with anatomical location. Significance: Adhesive materials may interact differently within a tooth as well as in different age groups.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T06:20:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a6e01b9b64af449287e1d145cbd0a774
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2590-1524
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T06:20:57Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Structural Biology: X
spelling doaj.art-a6e01b9b64af449287e1d145cbd0a7742022-12-22T04:40:34ZengElsevierJournal of Structural Biology: X2590-15242022-01-016100060Does dentine mineral change with anatomical location, microscopic site and patient age?Arosha T. Weerakoon0Crystal Cooper1Ian A. Meyers2Nicholas Condon3Christopher Sexton4David Thomson5Pauline J. Ford6Anne L. Symons7School of Dentistry, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Corresponding author at: Oral Health Centre, Herston Road, Herston, School of Dentistry, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia.Central Analytical Research Facility, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, AustraliaSchool of Dentistry, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, AustraliaInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, AustraliaSchool of Dentistry, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, AustraliaSchool of Dentistry, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, AustraliaSchool of Dentistry, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, AustraliaSchool of Dentistry, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, AustraliaObjective: To determine the effect of patient age (young or mature), anatomical location (shallow/deep and central/peripheral) and microscopic site (intertubular/peritubular) on dentine mineral density, distribution and composition. Methods: Extracted posterior teeth from young (aged 19–20 years, N = 4) and mature (aged 54–77 years, N = 4) subjects were prepared to shallow and deep slices. The dentine surface elemental composition was investigated in a SEM using Backscattered Electron (BSE) micrographs, Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy, and Integrated Mineral Analysis. Qualitative comparisons and quantitative measures using machine learning were used to analyse the BSE images. Quantitative outcomes were compared using quantile or linear regression models with bootstrapping to account for the multiple measures per sample. Subsequently, a Xenon Plasma Focussed Ion Beam Scanning Electron Microscopy (Xe PFIB-SEM) was used to mill large area (100 µm) cross-sections to investigate morphology through the dentine tubules using high resolution secondary electron micrographs. Results: With age, dentine mineral composition remains stable, but density changes with anatomical location and microscopic site. Microscopically, accessory tubules spread into intertubular dentine (ITD) from the main tubule lumens. Within the lumens, mineral deposits form calcospherites in the young that eventually coalesce in mature tubules and branches. The mineral occlusion in mature dentine increases overall ITD density to reflect peritubular dentine (PTD) infiltrate. The ITD observed in micrographs remained consistent for age and observation plane to suggest tubule deposition affects overall dentine density. Mineral density depends on the relative distribution of PTD to ITD that varies with anatomical location. Significance: Adhesive materials may interact differently within a tooth as well as in different age groups.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590152422000010DentineMineralApatiteBSESEM-EDSXe PFIB-SEM
spellingShingle Arosha T. Weerakoon
Crystal Cooper
Ian A. Meyers
Nicholas Condon
Christopher Sexton
David Thomson
Pauline J. Ford
Anne L. Symons
Does dentine mineral change with anatomical location, microscopic site and patient age?
Journal of Structural Biology: X
Dentine
Mineral
Apatite
BSE
SEM-EDS
Xe PFIB-SEM
title Does dentine mineral change with anatomical location, microscopic site and patient age?
title_full Does dentine mineral change with anatomical location, microscopic site and patient age?
title_fullStr Does dentine mineral change with anatomical location, microscopic site and patient age?
title_full_unstemmed Does dentine mineral change with anatomical location, microscopic site and patient age?
title_short Does dentine mineral change with anatomical location, microscopic site and patient age?
title_sort does dentine mineral change with anatomical location microscopic site and patient age
topic Dentine
Mineral
Apatite
BSE
SEM-EDS
Xe PFIB-SEM
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590152422000010
work_keys_str_mv AT aroshatweerakoon doesdentinemineralchangewithanatomicallocationmicroscopicsiteandpatientage
AT crystalcooper doesdentinemineralchangewithanatomicallocationmicroscopicsiteandpatientage
AT ianameyers doesdentinemineralchangewithanatomicallocationmicroscopicsiteandpatientage
AT nicholascondon doesdentinemineralchangewithanatomicallocationmicroscopicsiteandpatientage
AT christophersexton doesdentinemineralchangewithanatomicallocationmicroscopicsiteandpatientage
AT davidthomson doesdentinemineralchangewithanatomicallocationmicroscopicsiteandpatientage
AT paulinejford doesdentinemineralchangewithanatomicallocationmicroscopicsiteandpatientage
AT annelsymons doesdentinemineralchangewithanatomicallocationmicroscopicsiteandpatientage