Extraterritoriality of EU law and human rights after Lisbon: The case of trade and public procurement: Conclusion

This is a conclusion to a special issue on extraterritoriality on EU law and human rights. It offers some reflections on the articles in the special issue, in particular from the perspective of public international law and international trade law. In this context, it looks at the distinction between...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lorand Bartels
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UCL Press 2018-09-01
Series:Europe and the World
Online Access:https://uclpress.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14324/111.444.ewlj.2018.08
_version_ 1797896140434178048
author Lorand Bartels
author_facet Lorand Bartels
author_sort Lorand Bartels
collection DOAJ
description This is a conclusion to a special issue on extraterritoriality on EU law and human rights. It offers some reflections on the articles in the special issue, in particular from the perspective of public international law and international trade law. In this context, it looks at the distinction between the right of a State to regulate activities beyond its jurisdiction, and its obligation – including under human rights law – to do so. It also looks at how the answer might differ according to whether the form of regulation is direct or – especially common in international trade law, where the direct object of regulation relates to access to a domestic market – indirect.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T07:38:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a6f8ca5fd7284331b68c79bb87451b0e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2399-2875
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T07:38:11Z
publishDate 2018-09-01
publisher UCL Press
record_format Article
series Europe and the World
spelling doaj.art-a6f8ca5fd7284331b68c79bb87451b0e2023-02-23T12:24:34ZengUCL PressEurope and the World2399-28752018-09-01210.14324/111.444.ewlj.2018.08Extraterritoriality of EU law and human rights after Lisbon: The case of trade and public procurement: ConclusionLorand BartelsThis is a conclusion to a special issue on extraterritoriality on EU law and human rights. It offers some reflections on the articles in the special issue, in particular from the perspective of public international law and international trade law. In this context, it looks at the distinction between the right of a State to regulate activities beyond its jurisdiction, and its obligation – including under human rights law – to do so. It also looks at how the answer might differ according to whether the form of regulation is direct or – especially common in international trade law, where the direct object of regulation relates to access to a domestic market – indirect.https://uclpress.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14324/111.444.ewlj.2018.08
spellingShingle Lorand Bartels
Extraterritoriality of EU law and human rights after Lisbon: The case of trade and public procurement: Conclusion
Europe and the World
title Extraterritoriality of EU law and human rights after Lisbon: The case of trade and public procurement: Conclusion
title_full Extraterritoriality of EU law and human rights after Lisbon: The case of trade and public procurement: Conclusion
title_fullStr Extraterritoriality of EU law and human rights after Lisbon: The case of trade and public procurement: Conclusion
title_full_unstemmed Extraterritoriality of EU law and human rights after Lisbon: The case of trade and public procurement: Conclusion
title_short Extraterritoriality of EU law and human rights after Lisbon: The case of trade and public procurement: Conclusion
title_sort extraterritoriality of eu law and human rights after lisbon the case of trade and public procurement conclusion
url https://uclpress.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14324/111.444.ewlj.2018.08
work_keys_str_mv AT lorandbartels extraterritorialityofeulawandhumanrightsafterlisbonthecaseoftradeandpublicprocurementconclusion