Extraterritoriality of EU law and human rights after Lisbon: The case of trade and public procurement: Conclusion
This is a conclusion to a special issue on extraterritoriality on EU law and human rights. It offers some reflections on the articles in the special issue, in particular from the perspective of public international law and international trade law. In this context, it looks at the distinction between...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
UCL Press
2018-09-01
|
Series: | Europe and the World |
Online Access: | https://uclpress.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14324/111.444.ewlj.2018.08 |
_version_ | 1797896140434178048 |
---|---|
author | Lorand Bartels |
author_facet | Lorand Bartels |
author_sort | Lorand Bartels |
collection | DOAJ |
description | This is a conclusion to a special issue on extraterritoriality on EU law and human rights. It offers some reflections on the articles in the special issue, in particular from the perspective of public international law and international trade law. In this context, it looks at the distinction between the right of a State to regulate activities beyond its jurisdiction, and its obligation – including under human rights law – to do so. It also looks at how the answer might differ according to whether the form of regulation is direct or – especially common in international trade law, where the direct object of regulation relates to access to a domestic market – indirect. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-10T07:38:11Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-a6f8ca5fd7284331b68c79bb87451b0e |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2399-2875 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-10T07:38:11Z |
publishDate | 2018-09-01 |
publisher | UCL Press |
record_format | Article |
series | Europe and the World |
spelling | doaj.art-a6f8ca5fd7284331b68c79bb87451b0e2023-02-23T12:24:34ZengUCL PressEurope and the World2399-28752018-09-01210.14324/111.444.ewlj.2018.08Extraterritoriality of EU law and human rights after Lisbon: The case of trade and public procurement: ConclusionLorand BartelsThis is a conclusion to a special issue on extraterritoriality on EU law and human rights. It offers some reflections on the articles in the special issue, in particular from the perspective of public international law and international trade law. In this context, it looks at the distinction between the right of a State to regulate activities beyond its jurisdiction, and its obligation – including under human rights law – to do so. It also looks at how the answer might differ according to whether the form of regulation is direct or – especially common in international trade law, where the direct object of regulation relates to access to a domestic market – indirect.https://uclpress.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14324/111.444.ewlj.2018.08 |
spellingShingle | Lorand Bartels Extraterritoriality of EU law and human rights after Lisbon: The case of trade and public procurement: Conclusion Europe and the World |
title | Extraterritoriality of EU law and human rights after Lisbon: The case of trade and public procurement: Conclusion |
title_full | Extraterritoriality of EU law and human rights after Lisbon: The case of trade and public procurement: Conclusion |
title_fullStr | Extraterritoriality of EU law and human rights after Lisbon: The case of trade and public procurement: Conclusion |
title_full_unstemmed | Extraterritoriality of EU law and human rights after Lisbon: The case of trade and public procurement: Conclusion |
title_short | Extraterritoriality of EU law and human rights after Lisbon: The case of trade and public procurement: Conclusion |
title_sort | extraterritoriality of eu law and human rights after lisbon the case of trade and public procurement conclusion |
url | https://uclpress.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14324/111.444.ewlj.2018.08 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lorandbartels extraterritorialityofeulawandhumanrightsafterlisbonthecaseoftradeandpublicprocurementconclusion |