Comparison of lattice and pseudo 3D numerical simulation of tip screen out operation

Hydraulic fracturing (HF) is a commonly used technique to stimulate low permeability formations such as shale plays and tight formations. However, this method of well stimulation has also been used in high permeable unconsolidated sandstone formations to bypass near-wellbore formation damage and pre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmed Merzoug, Vibhas Pandey, Vamegh Rasouli, Branko Damjanac, Hui Pu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. 2023-09-01
Series:Petroleum
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405656123000196
_version_ 1827820663271849984
author Ahmed Merzoug
Vibhas Pandey
Vamegh Rasouli
Branko Damjanac
Hui Pu
author_facet Ahmed Merzoug
Vibhas Pandey
Vamegh Rasouli
Branko Damjanac
Hui Pu
author_sort Ahmed Merzoug
collection DOAJ
description Hydraulic fracturing (HF) is a commonly used technique to stimulate low permeability formations such as shale plays and tight formations. However, this method of well stimulation has also been used in high permeable unconsolidated sandstone formations to bypass near-wellbore formation damage and prevent sand production at some distance apart from the wellbore wall. The treatment is called frac-pack completion, where a short length but wide width fracture is formed by injecting aggressive concentrations of proppant into the fracture plane. This operation is known as tip screen-out (TSO). Detailed design of fluid and proppant, including an optimal pump schedule, is required to achieve satisfactory TSO. In this study, we first assess the lattice-based numerical method's capabilities for simulating hydraulic fracturing propagation in elastoplastic formation. The results will be compared with the same case simulation results using a pseudo 3D (P3D) model and analytical model. Second, we explore the Nolte (1986) design for frac-pack and TSO treatment using lattice-based software and the P3D model. The results showed that both models could simulate the hydraulic fracturing propagation in soft formation and TSO operation, while some differences were observed in generated geometry, the tip screenout time and net pressure profiles. The results are presented. It was noted that fracture propagation regime (viscosity/toughness), nonlocality and nonlinearity had an influence on the different geometries. The advantages of each model will be discussed.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T01:30:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a707eea5aa9f45b3ba0a7d68a0a5151f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2405-6561
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T01:30:32Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
record_format Article
series Petroleum
spelling doaj.art-a707eea5aa9f45b3ba0a7d68a0a5151f2023-09-12T04:16:13ZengKeAi Communications Co., Ltd.Petroleum2405-65612023-09-0193454467Comparison of lattice and pseudo 3D numerical simulation of tip screen out operationAhmed Merzoug0Vibhas Pandey1Vamegh Rasouli2Branko Damjanac3Hui Pu4Department of Petroleum Engineering, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND, USA; Corresponding author.ConocoPhillips, Houston, TX, USADepartment of Petroleum Engineering, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND, USAItasca Consulting Group, Minneapolis, USADepartment of Petroleum Engineering, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND, USAHydraulic fracturing (HF) is a commonly used technique to stimulate low permeability formations such as shale plays and tight formations. However, this method of well stimulation has also been used in high permeable unconsolidated sandstone formations to bypass near-wellbore formation damage and prevent sand production at some distance apart from the wellbore wall. The treatment is called frac-pack completion, where a short length but wide width fracture is formed by injecting aggressive concentrations of proppant into the fracture plane. This operation is known as tip screen-out (TSO). Detailed design of fluid and proppant, including an optimal pump schedule, is required to achieve satisfactory TSO. In this study, we first assess the lattice-based numerical method's capabilities for simulating hydraulic fracturing propagation in elastoplastic formation. The results will be compared with the same case simulation results using a pseudo 3D (P3D) model and analytical model. Second, we explore the Nolte (1986) design for frac-pack and TSO treatment using lattice-based software and the P3D model. The results showed that both models could simulate the hydraulic fracturing propagation in soft formation and TSO operation, while some differences were observed in generated geometry, the tip screenout time and net pressure profiles. The results are presented. It was noted that fracture propagation regime (viscosity/toughness), nonlocality and nonlinearity had an influence on the different geometries. The advantages of each model will be discussed.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405656123000196Frac-packTip screen-outLatticePseudo 3DProppantPump schedule
spellingShingle Ahmed Merzoug
Vibhas Pandey
Vamegh Rasouli
Branko Damjanac
Hui Pu
Comparison of lattice and pseudo 3D numerical simulation of tip screen out operation
Petroleum
Frac-pack
Tip screen-out
Lattice
Pseudo 3D
Proppant
Pump schedule
title Comparison of lattice and pseudo 3D numerical simulation of tip screen out operation
title_full Comparison of lattice and pseudo 3D numerical simulation of tip screen out operation
title_fullStr Comparison of lattice and pseudo 3D numerical simulation of tip screen out operation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of lattice and pseudo 3D numerical simulation of tip screen out operation
title_short Comparison of lattice and pseudo 3D numerical simulation of tip screen out operation
title_sort comparison of lattice and pseudo 3d numerical simulation of tip screen out operation
topic Frac-pack
Tip screen-out
Lattice
Pseudo 3D
Proppant
Pump schedule
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405656123000196
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedmerzoug comparisonoflatticeandpseudo3dnumericalsimulationoftipscreenoutoperation
AT vibhaspandey comparisonoflatticeandpseudo3dnumericalsimulationoftipscreenoutoperation
AT vameghrasouli comparisonoflatticeandpseudo3dnumericalsimulationoftipscreenoutoperation
AT brankodamjanac comparisonoflatticeandpseudo3dnumericalsimulationoftipscreenoutoperation
AT huipu comparisonoflatticeandpseudo3dnumericalsimulationoftipscreenoutoperation