Principal Directions of Evaluation of Expert Evidence
The article deals with the evaluation procedure of expert evidence, which was prepared subsequent to the results of the examination of evidence. Expert evidence is evaluated from the point of view of relevance of evidence, its admissibility and credibility. The author recommends the response sequenc...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Russian |
| Published: |
Omsk Law Academy
2015-03-01
|
| Series: | Сибирское юридическое обозрение |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.siberianlawreview.ru/jour/article/view/708 |
| _version_ | 1797261113173213184 |
|---|---|
| author | A. A. Kuznetsov |
| author_facet | A. A. Kuznetsov |
| author_sort | A. A. Kuznetsov |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The article deals with the evaluation procedure of expert evidence, which was prepared subsequent to the results of the examination of evidence. Expert evidence is evaluated from the point of view of relevance of evidence, its admissibility and credibility. The author recommends the response sequence of an investigator while evaluating expert evidence. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-09T01:01:04Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-a70a62abeea041cbae0a09be2c5f2ec3 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2658-7602 2658-7610 |
| language | Russian |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-24T23:36:03Z |
| publishDate | 2015-03-01 |
| publisher | Omsk Law Academy |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Сибирское юридическое обозрение |
| spelling | doaj.art-a70a62abeea041cbae0a09be2c5f2ec32024-03-15T14:13:28ZrusOmsk Law AcademyСибирское юридическое обозрение2658-76022658-76102015-03-01016365680Principal Directions of Evaluation of Expert EvidenceA. A. Kuznetsov0Omsk Academy of the Ministry of the Internal Affairs of RussiaThe article deals with the evaluation procedure of expert evidence, which was prepared subsequent to the results of the examination of evidence. Expert evidence is evaluated from the point of view of relevance of evidence, its admissibility and credibility. The author recommends the response sequence of an investigator while evaluating expert evidence.https://www.siberianlawreview.ru/jour/article/view/708cледовательзаключение экспертаоценка заключения экспертаinvestigatorexpert evidenceevaluation of the results of expert examination |
| spellingShingle | A. A. Kuznetsov Principal Directions of Evaluation of Expert Evidence Сибирское юридическое обозрение cледователь заключение эксперта оценка заключения эксперта investigator expert evidence evaluation of the results of expert examination |
| title | Principal Directions of Evaluation of Expert Evidence |
| title_full | Principal Directions of Evaluation of Expert Evidence |
| title_fullStr | Principal Directions of Evaluation of Expert Evidence |
| title_full_unstemmed | Principal Directions of Evaluation of Expert Evidence |
| title_short | Principal Directions of Evaluation of Expert Evidence |
| title_sort | principal directions of evaluation of expert evidence |
| topic | cледователь заключение эксперта оценка заключения эксперта investigator expert evidence evaluation of the results of expert examination |
| url | https://www.siberianlawreview.ru/jour/article/view/708 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT aakuznetsov principaldirectionsofevaluationofexpertevidence |