Qualitative and quantitative analyses of artificial intelligence ethics in education using VOSviewer and CitNetExplorer
The new decade has been witnessing the wide acceptance of artificial intelligence (AI) in education, followed by serious concerns about its ethics. This study examined the essence and principles of AI ethics used in education, as well as the bibliometric analysis of AI ethics for educational purpose...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023-03-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1061778/full |
| _version_ | 1811155694313799680 |
|---|---|
| author | Liheng Yu Zhonggen Yu |
| author_facet | Liheng Yu Zhonggen Yu |
| author_sort | Liheng Yu |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The new decade has been witnessing the wide acceptance of artificial intelligence (AI) in education, followed by serious concerns about its ethics. This study examined the essence and principles of AI ethics used in education, as well as the bibliometric analysis of AI ethics for educational purposes. The clustering techniques of VOSviewer (n = 880) led the author to reveal the top 10 authors, sources, organizations, and countries in the research of AI ethics in education. The analysis of clustering solution through CitNetExplorer (n = 841) concluded that the essence of AI ethics for educational purposes included deontology, utilitarianism, and virtue, while the principles of AI ethics in education included transparency, justice, fairness, equity, non-maleficence, responsibility, and privacy. Future research could consider the influence of AI interpretability on AI ethics in education because the ability to interpret the AI decisions could help judge whether the decision is consistent with ethical criteria. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T04:37:44Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-a71b077b13344246b643814a23333d55 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1664-1078 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T04:37:44Z |
| publishDate | 2023-03-01 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Frontiers in Psychology |
| spelling | doaj.art-a71b077b13344246b643814a23333d552023-03-09T13:44:30ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782023-03-011410.3389/fpsyg.2023.10617781061778Qualitative and quantitative analyses of artificial intelligence ethics in education using VOSviewer and CitNetExplorerLiheng Yu0Zhonggen Yu1School of Engineering, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United KingdomFaculty of Foreign Studies, Beijing Language and Culture University, Beijing, ChinaThe new decade has been witnessing the wide acceptance of artificial intelligence (AI) in education, followed by serious concerns about its ethics. This study examined the essence and principles of AI ethics used in education, as well as the bibliometric analysis of AI ethics for educational purposes. The clustering techniques of VOSviewer (n = 880) led the author to reveal the top 10 authors, sources, organizations, and countries in the research of AI ethics in education. The analysis of clustering solution through CitNetExplorer (n = 841) concluded that the essence of AI ethics for educational purposes included deontology, utilitarianism, and virtue, while the principles of AI ethics in education included transparency, justice, fairness, equity, non-maleficence, responsibility, and privacy. Future research could consider the influence of AI interpretability on AI ethics in education because the ability to interpret the AI decisions could help judge whether the decision is consistent with ethical criteria.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1061778/fullartificial intelligenceethicsbibliometric analysisVOSviewerCitNetExplorer |
| spellingShingle | Liheng Yu Zhonggen Yu Qualitative and quantitative analyses of artificial intelligence ethics in education using VOSviewer and CitNetExplorer Frontiers in Psychology artificial intelligence ethics bibliometric analysis VOSviewer CitNetExplorer |
| title | Qualitative and quantitative analyses of artificial intelligence ethics in education using VOSviewer and CitNetExplorer |
| title_full | Qualitative and quantitative analyses of artificial intelligence ethics in education using VOSviewer and CitNetExplorer |
| title_fullStr | Qualitative and quantitative analyses of artificial intelligence ethics in education using VOSviewer and CitNetExplorer |
| title_full_unstemmed | Qualitative and quantitative analyses of artificial intelligence ethics in education using VOSviewer and CitNetExplorer |
| title_short | Qualitative and quantitative analyses of artificial intelligence ethics in education using VOSviewer and CitNetExplorer |
| title_sort | qualitative and quantitative analyses of artificial intelligence ethics in education using vosviewer and citnetexplorer |
| topic | artificial intelligence ethics bibliometric analysis VOSviewer CitNetExplorer |
| url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1061778/full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lihengyu qualitativeandquantitativeanalysesofartificialintelligenceethicsineducationusingvosviewerandcitnetexplorer AT zhonggenyu qualitativeandquantitativeanalysesofartificialintelligenceethicsineducationusingvosviewerandcitnetexplorer |