The effects of population management on wild ungulates: A systematic map of evidence for UK species.
<h4>Introduction</h4>Over recent decades, the abundance and geographic ranges of wild ungulate species have expanded in many parts of Europe, including the UK. Populations are managed to mitigate their ecological impacts using interventions, such as shooting, fencing and administering co...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2022-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267385 |
| _version_ | 1817970394531889152 |
|---|---|
| author | Owain Barton Amy Gresham John R Healey Line S Cordes Graeme Shannon |
| author_facet | Owain Barton Amy Gresham John R Healey Line S Cordes Graeme Shannon |
| author_sort | Owain Barton |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <h4>Introduction</h4>Over recent decades, the abundance and geographic ranges of wild ungulate species have expanded in many parts of Europe, including the UK. Populations are managed to mitigate their ecological impacts using interventions, such as shooting, fencing and administering contraception. Predicting how target species will respond to interventions is critical for developing sustainable, effective and efficient management strategies. However, the quantity and quality of evidence of the effects of interventions on ungulate species is unclear. To address this, we systematically mapped research on the effects of population management on wild ungulate species resident in the UK.<h4>Methods</h4>We searched four bibliographic databases, Google Scholar and nine organisational websites using search terms tested with a library of 30 relevant articles. Worldwide published peer-reviewed articles were considered, supplemented by 'grey' literature from UK-based sources. Three reviewers identified and screened articles for eligibility at title, abstract and full-text levels, based on predefined criteria. Data and metadata were extracted and summarised in a narrative synthesis supported by structured graphical matrices.<h4>Results</h4>A total of 123 articles were included in the systematic map. Lethal interventions were better represented (85%, n = 105) than non-lethal interventions (25%, n = 25). Outcomes related to demography and behaviour were reported in 95% of articles (n = 117), whereas effects on health, physiology and morphology were studied in only 11% of articles (n = 14). Well-studied species included wild pigs (n = 58), red deer (n = 28) and roe deer (n = 23).<h4>Conclusions</h4>Evidence for the effects of population management on wild ungulate species is growing but currently limited and unevenly distributed across intervention types, outcomes and species. Priorities for primary research include: species responses to non-lethal interventions, the side-effects of shooting and studies on sika deer and Chinese muntjac. Shooting is the only intervention for which sufficient evidence exists for systematic review or meta-analysis. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-13T20:33:26Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-a7225f77176e40e0a94e32d4c2b8c929 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-13T20:33:26Z |
| publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-a7225f77176e40e0a94e32d4c2b8c9292022-12-22T02:31:06ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032022-01-01176e026738510.1371/journal.pone.0267385The effects of population management on wild ungulates: A systematic map of evidence for UK species.Owain BartonAmy GreshamJohn R HealeyLine S CordesGraeme Shannon<h4>Introduction</h4>Over recent decades, the abundance and geographic ranges of wild ungulate species have expanded in many parts of Europe, including the UK. Populations are managed to mitigate their ecological impacts using interventions, such as shooting, fencing and administering contraception. Predicting how target species will respond to interventions is critical for developing sustainable, effective and efficient management strategies. However, the quantity and quality of evidence of the effects of interventions on ungulate species is unclear. To address this, we systematically mapped research on the effects of population management on wild ungulate species resident in the UK.<h4>Methods</h4>We searched four bibliographic databases, Google Scholar and nine organisational websites using search terms tested with a library of 30 relevant articles. Worldwide published peer-reviewed articles were considered, supplemented by 'grey' literature from UK-based sources. Three reviewers identified and screened articles for eligibility at title, abstract and full-text levels, based on predefined criteria. Data and metadata were extracted and summarised in a narrative synthesis supported by structured graphical matrices.<h4>Results</h4>A total of 123 articles were included in the systematic map. Lethal interventions were better represented (85%, n = 105) than non-lethal interventions (25%, n = 25). Outcomes related to demography and behaviour were reported in 95% of articles (n = 117), whereas effects on health, physiology and morphology were studied in only 11% of articles (n = 14). Well-studied species included wild pigs (n = 58), red deer (n = 28) and roe deer (n = 23).<h4>Conclusions</h4>Evidence for the effects of population management on wild ungulate species is growing but currently limited and unevenly distributed across intervention types, outcomes and species. Priorities for primary research include: species responses to non-lethal interventions, the side-effects of shooting and studies on sika deer and Chinese muntjac. Shooting is the only intervention for which sufficient evidence exists for systematic review or meta-analysis.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267385 |
| spellingShingle | Owain Barton Amy Gresham John R Healey Line S Cordes Graeme Shannon The effects of population management on wild ungulates: A systematic map of evidence for UK species. PLoS ONE |
| title | The effects of population management on wild ungulates: A systematic map of evidence for UK species. |
| title_full | The effects of population management on wild ungulates: A systematic map of evidence for UK species. |
| title_fullStr | The effects of population management on wild ungulates: A systematic map of evidence for UK species. |
| title_full_unstemmed | The effects of population management on wild ungulates: A systematic map of evidence for UK species. |
| title_short | The effects of population management on wild ungulates: A systematic map of evidence for UK species. |
| title_sort | effects of population management on wild ungulates a systematic map of evidence for uk species |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267385 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT owainbarton theeffectsofpopulationmanagementonwildungulatesasystematicmapofevidenceforukspecies AT amygresham theeffectsofpopulationmanagementonwildungulatesasystematicmapofevidenceforukspecies AT johnrhealey theeffectsofpopulationmanagementonwildungulatesasystematicmapofevidenceforukspecies AT linescordes theeffectsofpopulationmanagementonwildungulatesasystematicmapofevidenceforukspecies AT graemeshannon theeffectsofpopulationmanagementonwildungulatesasystematicmapofevidenceforukspecies AT owainbarton effectsofpopulationmanagementonwildungulatesasystematicmapofevidenceforukspecies AT amygresham effectsofpopulationmanagementonwildungulatesasystematicmapofevidenceforukspecies AT johnrhealey effectsofpopulationmanagementonwildungulatesasystematicmapofevidenceforukspecies AT linescordes effectsofpopulationmanagementonwildungulatesasystematicmapofevidenceforukspecies AT graemeshannon effectsofpopulationmanagementonwildungulatesasystematicmapofevidenceforukspecies |