A content analysis of women’s experiences of different models of maternity care: the Birth Experience Study (BESt)

Abstract Background Pregnancy, birth, and early parenthood are significant life experiences impacting women and their families. Growing evidence suggests models of maternity care impact clinical outcomes and birth experiences. The aim of this study was to explore the strengths and limitations of dif...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Helen Pelak, Hannah G. Dahlen, Hazel Keedle
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-12-01
Series:BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-06130-2
_version_ 1797388011916230656
author Helen Pelak
Hannah G. Dahlen
Hazel Keedle
author_facet Helen Pelak
Hannah G. Dahlen
Hazel Keedle
author_sort Helen Pelak
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Pregnancy, birth, and early parenthood are significant life experiences impacting women and their families. Growing evidence suggests models of maternity care impact clinical outcomes and birth experiences. The aim of this study was to explore the strengths and limitations of different maternity models of care accessed by women in Australia who had given birth in the past 5 years. Methods The data analysed and presented in this paper is from the Australian Birth Experience Study (BESt), an online national survey of 133 questions that received 8,804 completed responses. There were 2,909 open-ended comments in response to the question on health care provider/s. The data was analysed using content analysis and descriptive statistics. Results In models of fragmented care, including standard public hospital care (SC), high-risk care (HRC), and GP Shared care (GPS), women reported feelings of frustration in being unknown and unheard by their health care providers (HCP) that included themes of exhaustion in having to repeat personal history and the difficulty in navigating conflicting medical advice. Women in continuity of care (CoC) models, including Midwifery Group Practice (MGP), Private Obstetric (POB), and Privately Practising Midwifery (PPM), reported positive experiences of healing past birth trauma and care extending for multiple births. Compared across models of care in private and public settings, comments in HRC contained the lowest percentage of strengths (11.94%) and the highest percentage of limitations (88.06%) while comments in PPM revealed the highest percentage of strengths (95.93%) and the lowest percentage of limitations (4.07%). Conclusions Women across models of care in public and private settings desire relational maternity care founded on their unique needs, wishes, and values. The strengths of continuity of care, specifically private midwifery, should be recognised and the limitations for women in high risk maternity care investigated and prioritised by policy makers and managers in health services. Trial registration The study is part of a larger project that has been retrospectively registered with OSF Registries Registration DOI https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/4KQXP .
first_indexed 2024-03-08T22:34:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a72beff2642b4b7a8f464b4a6728b819
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2393
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T22:34:32Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
spelling doaj.art-a72beff2642b4b7a8f464b4a6728b8192023-12-17T12:32:55ZengBMCBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth1471-23932023-12-0123112610.1186/s12884-023-06130-2A content analysis of women’s experiences of different models of maternity care: the Birth Experience Study (BESt)Helen Pelak0Hannah G. Dahlen1Hazel Keedle2School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797Abstract Background Pregnancy, birth, and early parenthood are significant life experiences impacting women and their families. Growing evidence suggests models of maternity care impact clinical outcomes and birth experiences. The aim of this study was to explore the strengths and limitations of different maternity models of care accessed by women in Australia who had given birth in the past 5 years. Methods The data analysed and presented in this paper is from the Australian Birth Experience Study (BESt), an online national survey of 133 questions that received 8,804 completed responses. There were 2,909 open-ended comments in response to the question on health care provider/s. The data was analysed using content analysis and descriptive statistics. Results In models of fragmented care, including standard public hospital care (SC), high-risk care (HRC), and GP Shared care (GPS), women reported feelings of frustration in being unknown and unheard by their health care providers (HCP) that included themes of exhaustion in having to repeat personal history and the difficulty in navigating conflicting medical advice. Women in continuity of care (CoC) models, including Midwifery Group Practice (MGP), Private Obstetric (POB), and Privately Practising Midwifery (PPM), reported positive experiences of healing past birth trauma and care extending for multiple births. Compared across models of care in private and public settings, comments in HRC contained the lowest percentage of strengths (11.94%) and the highest percentage of limitations (88.06%) while comments in PPM revealed the highest percentage of strengths (95.93%) and the lowest percentage of limitations (4.07%). Conclusions Women across models of care in public and private settings desire relational maternity care founded on their unique needs, wishes, and values. The strengths of continuity of care, specifically private midwifery, should be recognised and the limitations for women in high risk maternity care investigated and prioritised by policy makers and managers in health services. Trial registration The study is part of a larger project that has been retrospectively registered with OSF Registries Registration DOI https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/4KQXP .https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-06130-2MidwiferyModels of careContinuity of careWomen’s experiences
spellingShingle Helen Pelak
Hannah G. Dahlen
Hazel Keedle
A content analysis of women’s experiences of different models of maternity care: the Birth Experience Study (BESt)
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Midwifery
Models of care
Continuity of care
Women’s experiences
title A content analysis of women’s experiences of different models of maternity care: the Birth Experience Study (BESt)
title_full A content analysis of women’s experiences of different models of maternity care: the Birth Experience Study (BESt)
title_fullStr A content analysis of women’s experiences of different models of maternity care: the Birth Experience Study (BESt)
title_full_unstemmed A content analysis of women’s experiences of different models of maternity care: the Birth Experience Study (BESt)
title_short A content analysis of women’s experiences of different models of maternity care: the Birth Experience Study (BESt)
title_sort content analysis of women s experiences of different models of maternity care the birth experience study best
topic Midwifery
Models of care
Continuity of care
Women’s experiences
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-06130-2
work_keys_str_mv AT helenpelak acontentanalysisofwomensexperiencesofdifferentmodelsofmaternitycarethebirthexperiencestudybest
AT hannahgdahlen acontentanalysisofwomensexperiencesofdifferentmodelsofmaternitycarethebirthexperiencestudybest
AT hazelkeedle acontentanalysisofwomensexperiencesofdifferentmodelsofmaternitycarethebirthexperiencestudybest
AT helenpelak contentanalysisofwomensexperiencesofdifferentmodelsofmaternitycarethebirthexperiencestudybest
AT hannahgdahlen contentanalysisofwomensexperiencesofdifferentmodelsofmaternitycarethebirthexperiencestudybest
AT hazelkeedle contentanalysisofwomensexperiencesofdifferentmodelsofmaternitycarethebirthexperiencestudybest