Measuring Cognitive Load: Are There More Valid Alternatives to Likert Rating Scales?
Cognitive load researchers have used varying subjective techniques based on rating scales to quantify experienced cognitive load. Although it is generally assumed that subjects can introspect on their cognitive processes and have no difficulty in assigning numerical values to the imposed cognitive l...
Main Authors: | Kim Ouwehand, Avalon van der Kroef, Jacqueline Wong, Fred Paas |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-09-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Education |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2021.702616/full |
Similar Items
-
Editorial: Recent Approaches for Assessing Cognitive Load From a Validity Perspective
by: Moritz Krell, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01) -
The Association between Motivation, Affect, and Self-regulated Learning When Solving Problems
by: Martine Baars, et al.
Published: (2017-08-01) -
Why is it always me? [kasetvideo]
Published: ([19-) -
Health technology assessment (HTA) of optoelectronic biosensors for oncology by analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and Likert scale
by: Giovanni Improta, et al.
Published: (2019-07-01) -
The structure of algebraic problem in high schools
by: Chio, José Angel, et al.
Published: (2010-01-01)