Ventricular arrhythmia events in heart failure patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without a defibrillator for primary prevention

Abstract Background It is uncertain whether cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT‐D) provides better survival benefits than a CRT‐pacemaker (CRT‐P) in heart failure patients with a reduced ejection fraction (≦35%, HFrEF) treated with contemporary HF therapy. Methods We retrospe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Toshihiro Nakamura, Koji Fukuzawa, Kunihiko Kiuchi, Mitsuru Takami, Yusuke Sonoda, Hiroyuki Takahara, Kazutaka Nakasone, Kyoko Yamamoto, Yuya Suzuki, Ken‐ichi Tani, Hidehiro Iwai, Yusuke Nakanishi, Mitsuhiko Shoda, Atsushi Murakami, Shogo Yonehara, Ken‐ichi Hirata
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-12-01
Series:Journal of Arrhythmia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12795
_version_ 1811178196502052864
author Toshihiro Nakamura
Koji Fukuzawa
Kunihiko Kiuchi
Mitsuru Takami
Yusuke Sonoda
Hiroyuki Takahara
Kazutaka Nakasone
Kyoko Yamamoto
Yuya Suzuki
Ken‐ichi Tani
Hidehiro Iwai
Yusuke Nakanishi
Mitsuhiko Shoda
Atsushi Murakami
Shogo Yonehara
Ken‐ichi Hirata
author_facet Toshihiro Nakamura
Koji Fukuzawa
Kunihiko Kiuchi
Mitsuru Takami
Yusuke Sonoda
Hiroyuki Takahara
Kazutaka Nakasone
Kyoko Yamamoto
Yuya Suzuki
Ken‐ichi Tani
Hidehiro Iwai
Yusuke Nakanishi
Mitsuhiko Shoda
Atsushi Murakami
Shogo Yonehara
Ken‐ichi Hirata
author_sort Toshihiro Nakamura
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background It is uncertain whether cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT‐D) provides better survival benefits than a CRT‐pacemaker (CRT‐P) in heart failure patients with a reduced ejection fraction (≦35%, HFrEF) treated with contemporary HF therapy. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the ventricular arrhythmia (VAs; sustained ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation) events in HFrEF patients who underwent CRT without a prior history of VAs or aborted sudden cardiac death before the CRT implantation. Between January/2010 and December/2020, a CRT device was implanted in 79 HFrEF patients (mean age: 69 ± 12 years, male: 57, ischemic cardiomyopathy: 16). CRT‐D and CRT‐P devices were implanted in 50 and 29 patients, respectively, at each physician's discretion. CRT‐Ds were indicated in younger patients than were CRT‐Ps (66 ± 12 vs. 73 ± 12 years, p = 0.03), but the gender distribution did not differ (female, 24% [12 of 50] vs. 35% [10 of 29], p = 0.44). The VA events during a median follow‐up of 3.5‐years (interquartile range [IQR]:1.6–5.5) and their predictors were analyzed. Results VA events occurred in 9 patients with CRT‐Ds (18%) and one with a CRT‐P (3%, p = 0.08). The VA event rate was significantly lower in patients without a prior non‐sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT: ≥3 beats; rate, ≥120 bpm; lasting <30 s, HR 0.05; 95% CI 0.01–0.30; p < 0.01) and females (HR 0.11; 95% CI 0.01–0.93; p = 0.04). Of note, no female patients without a prior history of NSVT experienced VA events. Conclusion HFrEF CRT candidates without a prior history of NSVT and females may obtain less benefit from a primary preventive defibrillator indication.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T06:14:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a72f08f805554cb7b295f2e05152b1fe
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1880-4276
1883-2148
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T06:14:25Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Arrhythmia
spelling doaj.art-a72f08f805554cb7b295f2e05152b1fe2022-12-22T04:41:06ZengWileyJournal of Arrhythmia1880-42761883-21482022-12-013861056106210.1002/joa3.12795Ventricular arrhythmia events in heart failure patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without a defibrillator for primary preventionToshihiro Nakamura0Koji Fukuzawa1Kunihiko Kiuchi2Mitsuru Takami3Yusuke Sonoda4Hiroyuki Takahara5Kazutaka Nakasone6Kyoko Yamamoto7Yuya Suzuki8Ken‐ichi Tani9Hidehiro Iwai10Yusuke Nakanishi11Mitsuhiko Shoda12Atsushi Murakami13Shogo Yonehara14Ken‐ichi Hirata15Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine Kobe JapanDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine Kobe JapanDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine Kobe JapanDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine Kobe JapanDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine Kobe JapanDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine Kobe JapanDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine Kobe JapanDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine Kobe JapanDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine Kobe JapanDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine Kobe JapanDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine Kobe JapanDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine Kobe JapanDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine Kobe JapanDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine Kobe JapanDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine Kobe JapanDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine Kobe JapanAbstract Background It is uncertain whether cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT‐D) provides better survival benefits than a CRT‐pacemaker (CRT‐P) in heart failure patients with a reduced ejection fraction (≦35%, HFrEF) treated with contemporary HF therapy. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the ventricular arrhythmia (VAs; sustained ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation) events in HFrEF patients who underwent CRT without a prior history of VAs or aborted sudden cardiac death before the CRT implantation. Between January/2010 and December/2020, a CRT device was implanted in 79 HFrEF patients (mean age: 69 ± 12 years, male: 57, ischemic cardiomyopathy: 16). CRT‐D and CRT‐P devices were implanted in 50 and 29 patients, respectively, at each physician's discretion. CRT‐Ds were indicated in younger patients than were CRT‐Ps (66 ± 12 vs. 73 ± 12 years, p = 0.03), but the gender distribution did not differ (female, 24% [12 of 50] vs. 35% [10 of 29], p = 0.44). The VA events during a median follow‐up of 3.5‐years (interquartile range [IQR]:1.6–5.5) and their predictors were analyzed. Results VA events occurred in 9 patients with CRT‐Ds (18%) and one with a CRT‐P (3%, p = 0.08). The VA event rate was significantly lower in patients without a prior non‐sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT: ≥3 beats; rate, ≥120 bpm; lasting <30 s, HR 0.05; 95% CI 0.01–0.30; p < 0.01) and females (HR 0.11; 95% CI 0.01–0.93; p = 0.04). Of note, no female patients without a prior history of NSVT experienced VA events. Conclusion HFrEF CRT candidates without a prior history of NSVT and females may obtain less benefit from a primary preventive defibrillator indication.https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12795cardiac resynchronization therapyheart failure with reduced ejection fractionprimary preventionventricular arrhythmia
spellingShingle Toshihiro Nakamura
Koji Fukuzawa
Kunihiko Kiuchi
Mitsuru Takami
Yusuke Sonoda
Hiroyuki Takahara
Kazutaka Nakasone
Kyoko Yamamoto
Yuya Suzuki
Ken‐ichi Tani
Hidehiro Iwai
Yusuke Nakanishi
Mitsuhiko Shoda
Atsushi Murakami
Shogo Yonehara
Ken‐ichi Hirata
Ventricular arrhythmia events in heart failure patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without a defibrillator for primary prevention
Journal of Arrhythmia
cardiac resynchronization therapy
heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
primary prevention
ventricular arrhythmia
title Ventricular arrhythmia events in heart failure patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without a defibrillator for primary prevention
title_full Ventricular arrhythmia events in heart failure patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without a defibrillator for primary prevention
title_fullStr Ventricular arrhythmia events in heart failure patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without a defibrillator for primary prevention
title_full_unstemmed Ventricular arrhythmia events in heart failure patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without a defibrillator for primary prevention
title_short Ventricular arrhythmia events in heart failure patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without a defibrillator for primary prevention
title_sort ventricular arrhythmia events in heart failure patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without a defibrillator for primary prevention
topic cardiac resynchronization therapy
heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
primary prevention
ventricular arrhythmia
url https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12795
work_keys_str_mv AT toshihironakamura ventriculararrhythmiaeventsinheartfailurepatientswithcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithorwithoutadefibrillatorforprimaryprevention
AT kojifukuzawa ventriculararrhythmiaeventsinheartfailurepatientswithcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithorwithoutadefibrillatorforprimaryprevention
AT kunihikokiuchi ventriculararrhythmiaeventsinheartfailurepatientswithcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithorwithoutadefibrillatorforprimaryprevention
AT mitsurutakami ventriculararrhythmiaeventsinheartfailurepatientswithcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithorwithoutadefibrillatorforprimaryprevention
AT yusukesonoda ventriculararrhythmiaeventsinheartfailurepatientswithcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithorwithoutadefibrillatorforprimaryprevention
AT hiroyukitakahara ventriculararrhythmiaeventsinheartfailurepatientswithcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithorwithoutadefibrillatorforprimaryprevention
AT kazutakanakasone ventriculararrhythmiaeventsinheartfailurepatientswithcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithorwithoutadefibrillatorforprimaryprevention
AT kyokoyamamoto ventriculararrhythmiaeventsinheartfailurepatientswithcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithorwithoutadefibrillatorforprimaryprevention
AT yuyasuzuki ventriculararrhythmiaeventsinheartfailurepatientswithcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithorwithoutadefibrillatorforprimaryprevention
AT kenichitani ventriculararrhythmiaeventsinheartfailurepatientswithcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithorwithoutadefibrillatorforprimaryprevention
AT hidehiroiwai ventriculararrhythmiaeventsinheartfailurepatientswithcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithorwithoutadefibrillatorforprimaryprevention
AT yusukenakanishi ventriculararrhythmiaeventsinheartfailurepatientswithcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithorwithoutadefibrillatorforprimaryprevention
AT mitsuhikoshoda ventriculararrhythmiaeventsinheartfailurepatientswithcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithorwithoutadefibrillatorforprimaryprevention
AT atsushimurakami ventriculararrhythmiaeventsinheartfailurepatientswithcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithorwithoutadefibrillatorforprimaryprevention
AT shogoyonehara ventriculararrhythmiaeventsinheartfailurepatientswithcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithorwithoutadefibrillatorforprimaryprevention
AT kenichihirata ventriculararrhythmiaeventsinheartfailurepatientswithcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithorwithoutadefibrillatorforprimaryprevention