An evaluation of epidemiological and reporting characteristics of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) systematic reviews (SRs).
Systematic reviews (SRs) are abundant. The optimal reporting of SRs is critical to enable clinicians to use their findings to make informed treatment decisions. Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies are widely used therefore it is critical that conduct and reporting of systematic re...
Main Authors: | Lucy Turner, James Galipeau, Chantelle Garritty, Eric Manheimer, L Susan Wieland, Fatemeh Yazdi, David Moher |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2013-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3544927?pdf=render |
Similar Items
-
An evaluation of the completeness of safety reporting in reports of complementary and alternative medicine trials
by: Galipeau James, et al.
Published: (2011-08-01) -
The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in Europe
by: Erlend L. Fjær, et al.
Published: (2020-04-01) -
Psychological determinants of the use of complementary and alternative medicine – CAM
by: Joanna Księska-Koszałka
Published: (2021-12-01) -
Use of alternative–complementary-medicine (CAM) in Calabrian children
by: Dolceamore Teresa Rita, et al.
Published: (2012-12-01) -
Prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use in Brazil
by: Patricia de Moraes Mello Boccolini, et al.
Published: (2020-02-01)