The process for designing and constructing the Komazawa Olympic Park control tower

By analysing the design process for both the control tower plan proposed by architect Masachika Murata that went unselected and the control tower plan by architect Yoshinobu Ashihara, which was selected, this study aims to clarify the main points regarding the design of memorial towers for internati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Toyokawa Saikaku
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2023-12-01
Series:Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2023.2292064
_version_ 1797366142361141248
author Toyokawa Saikaku
author_facet Toyokawa Saikaku
author_sort Toyokawa Saikaku
collection DOAJ
description By analysing the design process for both the control tower plan proposed by architect Masachika Murata that went unselected and the control tower plan by architect Yoshinobu Ashihara, which was selected, this study aims to clarify the main points regarding the design of memorial towers for international events, of which the Olympics is a representative example. This study analyses the architects’ design intentions through a careful reading of primary materials, including sketches of and reports on several architects’ commemorative towers. Regarding the structure of this study, section 2.2 reflects upon the plans for the venues for the 11th and 12th Olympic Games and presents the role that the memorial tower was expected to fulfil. In section 2.3, the basic design for the Komazawa Olympic Park Central Plaza and sketch of the control tower by Murata are analysed, and the positioning of the control tower is reviewed. In section 2.4, a text in which Ashihara references the control tower is reviewed and a contrastive comparison is drawn between Murata’s plans for the control tower – to which a water supply function was added – and Ashihara’s plans for the control tower. As a result of this study, there are three ways to design towers for international events. The first is to base the design on precedent; the second is to make free use of contemporary cutting-edge techniques; and the third is to highlight the host country’s design characteristics within the building’s facade. Based on their respective points of view, both Murata and Ashihara engaged in the challenge of designing an Olympic memorial tower.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T17:00:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a7406e81ef6a400fab391c96379386e0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1347-2852
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T17:00:08Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering
spelling doaj.art-a7406e81ef6a400fab391c96379386e02024-01-04T15:59:07ZengTaylor & Francis GroupJournal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering1347-28522023-12-010011210.1080/13467581.2023.22920642292064The process for designing and constructing the Komazawa Olympic Park control towerToyokawa Saikaku0Chiba UniversityBy analysing the design process for both the control tower plan proposed by architect Masachika Murata that went unselected and the control tower plan by architect Yoshinobu Ashihara, which was selected, this study aims to clarify the main points regarding the design of memorial towers for international events, of which the Olympics is a representative example. This study analyses the architects’ design intentions through a careful reading of primary materials, including sketches of and reports on several architects’ commemorative towers. Regarding the structure of this study, section 2.2 reflects upon the plans for the venues for the 11th and 12th Olympic Games and presents the role that the memorial tower was expected to fulfil. In section 2.3, the basic design for the Komazawa Olympic Park Central Plaza and sketch of the control tower by Murata are analysed, and the positioning of the control tower is reviewed. In section 2.4, a text in which Ashihara references the control tower is reviewed and a contrastive comparison is drawn between Murata’s plans for the control tower – to which a water supply function was added – and Ashihara’s plans for the control tower. As a result of this study, there are three ways to design towers for international events. The first is to base the design on precedent; the second is to make free use of contemporary cutting-edge techniques; and the third is to highlight the host country’s design characteristics within the building’s facade. Based on their respective points of view, both Murata and Ashihara engaged in the challenge of designing an Olympic memorial tower.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2023.2292064masachika muratayoshinobu ashiharathe maifeldbell tower
spellingShingle Toyokawa Saikaku
The process for designing and constructing the Komazawa Olympic Park control tower
Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering
masachika murata
yoshinobu ashihara
the maifeld
bell tower
title The process for designing and constructing the Komazawa Olympic Park control tower
title_full The process for designing and constructing the Komazawa Olympic Park control tower
title_fullStr The process for designing and constructing the Komazawa Olympic Park control tower
title_full_unstemmed The process for designing and constructing the Komazawa Olympic Park control tower
title_short The process for designing and constructing the Komazawa Olympic Park control tower
title_sort process for designing and constructing the komazawa olympic park control tower
topic masachika murata
yoshinobu ashihara
the maifeld
bell tower
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2023.2292064
work_keys_str_mv AT toyokawasaikaku theprocessfordesigningandconstructingthekomazawaolympicparkcontroltower
AT toyokawasaikaku processfordesigningandconstructingthekomazawaolympicparkcontroltower