UpToDate versus DynaMed: a cross-sectional study comparing the speed and accuracy of two point-of-care information tools
Objective: To compare the accuracy, time to answer, user confidence, and user satisfaction between UpToDate and DynaMed (formerly DynaMed Plus), which are two popular point-of-care information tools. Methods: A crossover study was conducted with medical residents in obstetrics and gynecology and fam...
Main Authors: | Glyneva Bradley-Ridout, Erica Nekolaichuk, Trevor Jamieson, Claire Jones, Natalie Morson, Rita Chuang, Elena Springall |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
2021-10-01
|
Series: | Journal of the Medical Library Association |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://jmla.pitt.edu/ojs/jmla/article/view/1176 |
Similar Items
-
Race-based medicine in the point-of-care clinical resource UpToDate: A systematic content analysis
by: Jessica P. Cerdeña, et al.
Published: (2022-10-01) -
„Frage stellen, Antwort bekommen, weiterarbeiten!“ – Umfrage zur Benutzung von UpToDate an den Universitäten Freiburg, Leipzig, Münster und Regensburg
by: Obst, Oliver, et al.
Published: (2013-12-01) -
Nutzung und Nützlichkeit von Informationsressourcen im Praktischen Jahr: Eine Studie an der Medizinischen Fakultät der Universität Münster
by: Obst, Oliver, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01) -
CME in the Time of COVID-19: Educating Healthcare Professionals at the Point-of-care and Improving Performance Outcomes
by: Janet Damaske, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01) -
UPTODATE ROLLING COMPLEX IN THE CIS
by: V. A. Politov, et al.
Published: (2014-07-01)