Towards Normality: Planning-related Protests and Reactions by Planning
The paper argues for a stronger distinction within planning protests, which is today an everyday part of planning practice. Furthermore, it is argued that the diversity of planning protest can also be used for differentiated reactions of planning practitioners. It is possible and sensible to adopt...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
oekom verlag GmbH
2020-04-01
|
| Series: | Raumforschung und Raumordnung |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://rur.oekom.de/index.php/rur/article/view/279 |
| _version_ | 1797998520063492096 |
|---|---|
| author | Grischa Frederik Bertram Uwe Altrock |
| author_facet | Grischa Frederik Bertram Uwe Altrock |
| author_sort | Grischa Frederik Bertram |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
The paper argues for a stronger distinction within planning protests, which is today an everyday part of planning practice. Furthermore, it is argued that the diversity of planning protest can also be used for differentiated reactions of planning practitioners. It is possible and sensible to adopt theories from protest and social movements research to better understand protest in planning, yet specifications for planning-related protest are needed. Planning protests are understood as collective action and form of local political participation, which takes place independently participation offers and has a relation to local spatial planning. Based on an empirical survey and statistical analysis of more than four hundred planning-related citizen protests in Berlin between 2005 and 2015, supported by two qualitative case studies, a typology of nine protest types will be developed, that is specific in time and place. The causes and claims articulated in the framing of protesters are understood as alternative approaches to solving planning problems. In particular, a distinction is made between situational and planning-dependent as well as initiative and reactive types of protest. Differences in content appear to be of special importance for the current protests, but also underline its political character. Yet, they are only part of the phenomenological diversity of planning protest and reactions therefore are to be differentiated for every individual case. This will be highlighted with regard to protests that are organised either by affected or unaffected citizens.
|
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T10:50:07Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-a74191ab018142b1a67db8f73ef96579 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0034-0111 1869-4179 |
| language | deu |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T10:50:07Z |
| publishDate | 2020-04-01 |
| publisher | oekom verlag GmbH |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Raumforschung und Raumordnung |
| spelling | doaj.art-a74191ab018142b1a67db8f73ef965792022-12-22T04:28:57Zdeuoekom verlag GmbHRaumforschung und Raumordnung0034-01111869-41792020-04-0178210.2478/rara-2019-0059Towards Normality: Planning-related Protests and Reactions by PlanningGrischa Frederik Bertram0Uwe Altrock1Universität Kassel, Stadterneuerung und PlanungstheorieKassel, DeutschlandUniversität Kassel, Stadterneuerung und PlanungstheorieKassel, Deutschland The paper argues for a stronger distinction within planning protests, which is today an everyday part of planning practice. Furthermore, it is argued that the diversity of planning protest can also be used for differentiated reactions of planning practitioners. It is possible and sensible to adopt theories from protest and social movements research to better understand protest in planning, yet specifications for planning-related protest are needed. Planning protests are understood as collective action and form of local political participation, which takes place independently participation offers and has a relation to local spatial planning. Based on an empirical survey and statistical analysis of more than four hundred planning-related citizen protests in Berlin between 2005 and 2015, supported by two qualitative case studies, a typology of nine protest types will be developed, that is specific in time and place. The causes and claims articulated in the framing of protesters are understood as alternative approaches to solving planning problems. In particular, a distinction is made between situational and planning-dependent as well as initiative and reactive types of protest. Differences in content appear to be of special importance for the current protests, but also underline its political character. Yet, they are only part of the phenomenological diversity of planning protest and reactions therefore are to be differentiated for every individual case. This will be highlighted with regard to protests that are organised either by affected or unaffected citizens. https://rur.oekom.de/index.php/rur/article/view/279ProtestParticipationPlanning policyTypologyBerlin |
| spellingShingle | Grischa Frederik Bertram Uwe Altrock Towards Normality: Planning-related Protests and Reactions by Planning Raumforschung und Raumordnung Protest Participation Planning policy Typology Berlin |
| title | Towards Normality: Planning-related Protests and Reactions by Planning |
| title_full | Towards Normality: Planning-related Protests and Reactions by Planning |
| title_fullStr | Towards Normality: Planning-related Protests and Reactions by Planning |
| title_full_unstemmed | Towards Normality: Planning-related Protests and Reactions by Planning |
| title_short | Towards Normality: Planning-related Protests and Reactions by Planning |
| title_sort | towards normality planning related protests and reactions by planning |
| topic | Protest Participation Planning policy Typology Berlin |
| url | https://rur.oekom.de/index.php/rur/article/view/279 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT grischafrederikbertram towardsnormalityplanningrelatedprotestsandreactionsbyplanning AT uwealtrock towardsnormalityplanningrelatedprotestsandreactionsbyplanning |