Fawn birthdays: From opportunistically sampled fawn rescue data to true wildlife demographic parameters

Abstract Spring mowing in May and June is one of the main causes of mortality of roe deer fawns in agricultural regions. Knowing the exact birth distribution of fawns is important to guide farmers in their pre‐mowing precautions to avoid fawn deaths. Wildlife volunteers searching fields prior to mow...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Johanna Kauffert, Sophie Baur, Michael Matiu, Andreas König, Wibke Peters, Annette Menzel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-04-01
Series:Ecological Solutions and Evidence
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/2688-8319.12225
_version_ 1797784026414579712
author Johanna Kauffert
Sophie Baur
Michael Matiu
Andreas König
Wibke Peters
Annette Menzel
author_facet Johanna Kauffert
Sophie Baur
Michael Matiu
Andreas König
Wibke Peters
Annette Menzel
author_sort Johanna Kauffert
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Spring mowing in May and June is one of the main causes of mortality of roe deer fawns in agricultural regions. Knowing the exact birth distribution of fawns is important to guide farmers in their pre‐mowing precautions to avoid fawn deaths. Wildlife volunteers searching fields prior to mowing can act as citizen scientists by producing data sets of rescued fawns and their approximate age at find. However, due to weather‐dependent searches, the corresponding birth distributions can be highly skewed. We simulated virtual field data to examine the shortcomings of such data sources and introduced two algorithms for reconstructing reliable birth distribution parameters (mean and standard deviation) based on skewed samples. We found that weather‐dependent search data biased the calculated means and standard deviations by up to 14 and 5 days, respectively. However, the use of the proposed advanced algorithms (Grid Search and Machine Learning) resulted in better estimates of the sample means and standard deviations by reducing the root‐mean‐square error by 65% and 80% respectively. Furthermore, the Grid Search algorithm was able to capture birth distribution parameters based on real citizen science data in Bavaria, Germany, from 2021, which are close to the results of more systematic samples of the same year. The simulation exercise highlighted the shortcomings and discrepancies of using non‐probabilistic samples, for example on the occasion of mowing activities, to study demographic parameters compared to the true simulated distribution. Yet, the proposed algorithms can address these drawbacks and potentially turn citizen science data into an important data source for wildlife studies. This could ultimately help reduce wildlife losses during the mowing season by better knowing the distribution of births in a region.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T00:34:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a749a1c48a2a42a58a56079fbd032f9e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2688-8319
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T00:34:08Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Ecological Solutions and Evidence
spelling doaj.art-a749a1c48a2a42a58a56079fbd032f9e2023-07-10T07:36:35ZengWileyEcological Solutions and Evidence2688-83192023-04-0142n/an/a10.1002/2688-8319.12225Fawn birthdays: From opportunistically sampled fawn rescue data to true wildlife demographic parametersJohanna Kauffert0Sophie Baur1Michael Matiu2Andreas König3Wibke Peters4Annette Menzel5Ecoclimatology, TUM School of Life Sciences Technical University of Munich Hans‐Carl‐von‐Carlowitz‐Platz 2 D‐85354 Freising GermanyEcoclimatology, TUM School of Life Sciences Technical University of Munich Hans‐Carl‐von‐Carlowitz‐Platz 2 D‐85354 Freising GermanyDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering University of Tento I‐38122 Trento ItalyWildlife Biology and Management Unit, TUM School of Life Sciences Technical University of Munich Hans‐Carl‐von‐Carlowitz‐Platz 2 D‐85354 Freising GermanyBavarian State Institute of Forestry (LWF) Hans‐Carl‐von‐Carlowitz‐Platz 1 D‐85354 Freising GermanyEcoclimatology, TUM School of Life Sciences Technical University of Munich Hans‐Carl‐von‐Carlowitz‐Platz 2 D‐85354 Freising GermanyAbstract Spring mowing in May and June is one of the main causes of mortality of roe deer fawns in agricultural regions. Knowing the exact birth distribution of fawns is important to guide farmers in their pre‐mowing precautions to avoid fawn deaths. Wildlife volunteers searching fields prior to mowing can act as citizen scientists by producing data sets of rescued fawns and their approximate age at find. However, due to weather‐dependent searches, the corresponding birth distributions can be highly skewed. We simulated virtual field data to examine the shortcomings of such data sources and introduced two algorithms for reconstructing reliable birth distribution parameters (mean and standard deviation) based on skewed samples. We found that weather‐dependent search data biased the calculated means and standard deviations by up to 14 and 5 days, respectively. However, the use of the proposed advanced algorithms (Grid Search and Machine Learning) resulted in better estimates of the sample means and standard deviations by reducing the root‐mean‐square error by 65% and 80% respectively. Furthermore, the Grid Search algorithm was able to capture birth distribution parameters based on real citizen science data in Bavaria, Germany, from 2021, which are close to the results of more systematic samples of the same year. The simulation exercise highlighted the shortcomings and discrepancies of using non‐probabilistic samples, for example on the occasion of mowing activities, to study demographic parameters compared to the true simulated distribution. Yet, the proposed algorithms can address these drawbacks and potentially turn citizen science data into an important data source for wildlife studies. This could ultimately help reduce wildlife losses during the mowing season by better knowing the distribution of births in a region.https://doi.org/10.1002/2688-8319.12225Capreolus capreolusmowing deathnon‐probabilistic samplingparturition timingsimulation
spellingShingle Johanna Kauffert
Sophie Baur
Michael Matiu
Andreas König
Wibke Peters
Annette Menzel
Fawn birthdays: From opportunistically sampled fawn rescue data to true wildlife demographic parameters
Ecological Solutions and Evidence
Capreolus capreolus
mowing death
non‐probabilistic sampling
parturition timing
simulation
title Fawn birthdays: From opportunistically sampled fawn rescue data to true wildlife demographic parameters
title_full Fawn birthdays: From opportunistically sampled fawn rescue data to true wildlife demographic parameters
title_fullStr Fawn birthdays: From opportunistically sampled fawn rescue data to true wildlife demographic parameters
title_full_unstemmed Fawn birthdays: From opportunistically sampled fawn rescue data to true wildlife demographic parameters
title_short Fawn birthdays: From opportunistically sampled fawn rescue data to true wildlife demographic parameters
title_sort fawn birthdays from opportunistically sampled fawn rescue data to true wildlife demographic parameters
topic Capreolus capreolus
mowing death
non‐probabilistic sampling
parturition timing
simulation
url https://doi.org/10.1002/2688-8319.12225
work_keys_str_mv AT johannakauffert fawnbirthdaysfromopportunisticallysampledfawnrescuedatatotruewildlifedemographicparameters
AT sophiebaur fawnbirthdaysfromopportunisticallysampledfawnrescuedatatotruewildlifedemographicparameters
AT michaelmatiu fawnbirthdaysfromopportunisticallysampledfawnrescuedatatotruewildlifedemographicparameters
AT andreaskonig fawnbirthdaysfromopportunisticallysampledfawnrescuedatatotruewildlifedemographicparameters
AT wibkepeters fawnbirthdaysfromopportunisticallysampledfawnrescuedatatotruewildlifedemographicparameters
AT annettemenzel fawnbirthdaysfromopportunisticallysampledfawnrescuedatatotruewildlifedemographicparameters