Qualitative Comparison of 2D and 3D Atmospheric Corrosion Detection Methods
In this article, we report the use of a Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope (CLSM) to apply a qualitative assessment of atmospheric corrosion on steel samples. From the CLSM, we obtain high-resolution images, together with a 3D heightmap. The performance of four different segmentation algorithms that...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-06-01
|
| Series: | Materials |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/13/3621 |
| _version_ | 1797528482185478144 |
|---|---|
| author | Thomas De Kerf Navid Hasheminejad Johan Blom Steve Vanlanduit |
| author_facet | Thomas De Kerf Navid Hasheminejad Johan Blom Steve Vanlanduit |
| author_sort | Thomas De Kerf |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In this article, we report the use of a Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope (CLSM) to apply a qualitative assessment of atmospheric corrosion on steel samples. From the CLSM, we obtain high-resolution images, together with a 3D heightmap. The performance of four different segmentation algorithms that use the high-resolution images as input is qualitatively assessed and discussed. A novel 3D segmentation algorithm based on the shape index is presented and compared to the 2D segmentation algorithms. From this analysis, we conclude that there is a significant difference in performance between the 2D segmentation algorithms and that the 3D method can be an added value to the detection of corrosion. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-10T09:58:55Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-a751a75825434ee5ae331dfda7bbcb79 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1996-1944 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-10T09:58:55Z |
| publishDate | 2021-06-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Materials |
| spelling | doaj.art-a751a75825434ee5ae331dfda7bbcb792023-11-22T02:07:55ZengMDPI AGMaterials1996-19442021-06-011413362110.3390/ma14133621Qualitative Comparison of 2D and 3D Atmospheric Corrosion Detection MethodsThomas De Kerf0Navid Hasheminejad1Johan Blom2Steve Vanlanduit3Invilab Research Group, Faculty of Applied Engineering, University of Antwerp, 2020 Antwerp, BelgiumEMIB Research Group, Faculty of Applied Engineering, University of Antwerp, 2020 Antwerp, BelgiumEMIB Research Group, Faculty of Applied Engineering, University of Antwerp, 2020 Antwerp, BelgiumInvilab Research Group, Faculty of Applied Engineering, University of Antwerp, 2020 Antwerp, BelgiumIn this article, we report the use of a Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope (CLSM) to apply a qualitative assessment of atmospheric corrosion on steel samples. From the CLSM, we obtain high-resolution images, together with a 3D heightmap. The performance of four different segmentation algorithms that use the high-resolution images as input is qualitatively assessed and discussed. A novel 3D segmentation algorithm based on the shape index is presented and compared to the 2D segmentation algorithms. From this analysis, we conclude that there is a significant difference in performance between the 2D segmentation algorithms and that the 3D method can be an added value to the detection of corrosion.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/13/3621corrosionconfocal laser scanning microscopeimage segmentation |
| spellingShingle | Thomas De Kerf Navid Hasheminejad Johan Blom Steve Vanlanduit Qualitative Comparison of 2D and 3D Atmospheric Corrosion Detection Methods Materials corrosion confocal laser scanning microscope image segmentation |
| title | Qualitative Comparison of 2D and 3D Atmospheric Corrosion Detection Methods |
| title_full | Qualitative Comparison of 2D and 3D Atmospheric Corrosion Detection Methods |
| title_fullStr | Qualitative Comparison of 2D and 3D Atmospheric Corrosion Detection Methods |
| title_full_unstemmed | Qualitative Comparison of 2D and 3D Atmospheric Corrosion Detection Methods |
| title_short | Qualitative Comparison of 2D and 3D Atmospheric Corrosion Detection Methods |
| title_sort | qualitative comparison of 2d and 3d atmospheric corrosion detection methods |
| topic | corrosion confocal laser scanning microscope image segmentation |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/13/3621 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT thomasdekerf qualitativecomparisonof2dand3datmosphericcorrosiondetectionmethods AT navidhasheminejad qualitativecomparisonof2dand3datmosphericcorrosiondetectionmethods AT johanblom qualitativecomparisonof2dand3datmosphericcorrosiondetectionmethods AT stevevanlanduit qualitativecomparisonof2dand3datmosphericcorrosiondetectionmethods |