Exploring organisational mechanisms in PRO-based follow-up in routine outpatient care - an interpretive description of the clinician perspective

Abstract Background Patient-reported outcome (PRO)-based follow-up is a new model of service delivery, where PRO measures are used as the very basis for demand-driven outpatient follow-up in patients with chronic diseases. Adopting the clinicians’ perspective, we aimed to explore what happens when P...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Caroline Trillingsgaard Mejdahl, Liv Marit Valen Schougaard, Niels Henrik Hjollund, Erik Riiskjær, Kirsten Lomborg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-07-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-018-3352-y
_version_ 1818134627373547520
author Caroline Trillingsgaard Mejdahl
Liv Marit Valen Schougaard
Niels Henrik Hjollund
Erik Riiskjær
Kirsten Lomborg
author_facet Caroline Trillingsgaard Mejdahl
Liv Marit Valen Schougaard
Niels Henrik Hjollund
Erik Riiskjær
Kirsten Lomborg
author_sort Caroline Trillingsgaard Mejdahl
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Patient-reported outcome (PRO)-based follow-up is a new model of service delivery, where PRO measures are used as the very basis for demand-driven outpatient follow-up in patients with chronic diseases. Adopting the clinicians’ perspective, we aimed to explore what happens when PRO-based follow-up is implemented in routine clinical practice. We also aimed to identify organisational mechanisms related to PRO-based follow-up. Methods The methodological approach of this interview study is interpretive description, informed by a perspective of critical realism. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 clinicians (eight nurses and five physicians) working with PRO-based follow-up in outpatient care for epilepsy in the Central Denmark Region. Results PRO-based follow-up gave rise to ambivalence in clinicians. Seen from the clinicians’ perspective, PRO-based follow-up could both increase and decrease the quality of follow-up. Moreover, PRO-based follow-up both enhanced and impaired clinicians’ work experiences. Additionally, the clinicians used strategies to ease some of the perceived disadvantages. The clinicians did extra tasks and worked around the scope of PRO-based follow-up. Thus, clinicians constituted a professional buffer as they deflected some of the negative mechanisms associated with PRO-based follow-up. Conclusions As a model of a service delivery, PRO-based follow-up is highly dependent on the clinicians’ day-to-day management of the system, and mechanisms related to routine use of PRO measures in outpatient follow-up are complex. Paying attention to the organisational settings is critical for PRO-based follow-up to improve quality of care and enhance patient-centred care.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T09:11:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a76408aa268a4871b66f756e2c542f55
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6963
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T09:11:37Z
publishDate 2018-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Health Services Research
spelling doaj.art-a76408aa268a4871b66f756e2c542f552022-12-22T01:13:29ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632018-07-0118111210.1186/s12913-018-3352-yExploring organisational mechanisms in PRO-based follow-up in routine outpatient care - an interpretive description of the clinician perspectiveCaroline Trillingsgaard Mejdahl0Liv Marit Valen Schougaard1Niels Henrik Hjollund2Erik Riiskjær3Kirsten Lomborg4Department of Public Health, Aarhus UniversityWestChronic, Occupational Medicine, University Research Clinic, Aarhus UniversityWestChronic, Occupational Medicine, University Research Clinic, Aarhus UniversityDEFACTUM, Social & Health Services and Labour Market, Central Denmark RegionThe Research Program in Patient Involvement, Aarhus University HospitalAbstract Background Patient-reported outcome (PRO)-based follow-up is a new model of service delivery, where PRO measures are used as the very basis for demand-driven outpatient follow-up in patients with chronic diseases. Adopting the clinicians’ perspective, we aimed to explore what happens when PRO-based follow-up is implemented in routine clinical practice. We also aimed to identify organisational mechanisms related to PRO-based follow-up. Methods The methodological approach of this interview study is interpretive description, informed by a perspective of critical realism. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 clinicians (eight nurses and five physicians) working with PRO-based follow-up in outpatient care for epilepsy in the Central Denmark Region. Results PRO-based follow-up gave rise to ambivalence in clinicians. Seen from the clinicians’ perspective, PRO-based follow-up could both increase and decrease the quality of follow-up. Moreover, PRO-based follow-up both enhanced and impaired clinicians’ work experiences. Additionally, the clinicians used strategies to ease some of the perceived disadvantages. The clinicians did extra tasks and worked around the scope of PRO-based follow-up. Thus, clinicians constituted a professional buffer as they deflected some of the negative mechanisms associated with PRO-based follow-up. Conclusions As a model of a service delivery, PRO-based follow-up is highly dependent on the clinicians’ day-to-day management of the system, and mechanisms related to routine use of PRO measures in outpatient follow-up are complex. Paying attention to the organisational settings is critical for PRO-based follow-up to improve quality of care and enhance patient-centred care.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-018-3352-yPatient-reported outcome (PRO) measuresOutpatient follow-upQualitative researchInterpretive descriptionOrganisational mechanismsCustomisation
spellingShingle Caroline Trillingsgaard Mejdahl
Liv Marit Valen Schougaard
Niels Henrik Hjollund
Erik Riiskjær
Kirsten Lomborg
Exploring organisational mechanisms in PRO-based follow-up in routine outpatient care - an interpretive description of the clinician perspective
BMC Health Services Research
Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures
Outpatient follow-up
Qualitative research
Interpretive description
Organisational mechanisms
Customisation
title Exploring organisational mechanisms in PRO-based follow-up in routine outpatient care - an interpretive description of the clinician perspective
title_full Exploring organisational mechanisms in PRO-based follow-up in routine outpatient care - an interpretive description of the clinician perspective
title_fullStr Exploring organisational mechanisms in PRO-based follow-up in routine outpatient care - an interpretive description of the clinician perspective
title_full_unstemmed Exploring organisational mechanisms in PRO-based follow-up in routine outpatient care - an interpretive description of the clinician perspective
title_short Exploring organisational mechanisms in PRO-based follow-up in routine outpatient care - an interpretive description of the clinician perspective
title_sort exploring organisational mechanisms in pro based follow up in routine outpatient care an interpretive description of the clinician perspective
topic Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures
Outpatient follow-up
Qualitative research
Interpretive description
Organisational mechanisms
Customisation
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-018-3352-y
work_keys_str_mv AT carolinetrillingsgaardmejdahl exploringorganisationalmechanismsinprobasedfollowupinroutineoutpatientcareaninterpretivedescriptionoftheclinicianperspective
AT livmaritvalenschougaard exploringorganisationalmechanismsinprobasedfollowupinroutineoutpatientcareaninterpretivedescriptionoftheclinicianperspective
AT nielshenrikhjollund exploringorganisationalmechanismsinprobasedfollowupinroutineoutpatientcareaninterpretivedescriptionoftheclinicianperspective
AT erikriiskjær exploringorganisationalmechanismsinprobasedfollowupinroutineoutpatientcareaninterpretivedescriptionoftheclinicianperspective
AT kirstenlomborg exploringorganisationalmechanismsinprobasedfollowupinroutineoutpatientcareaninterpretivedescriptionoftheclinicianperspective