Partial gland ablation using high-intensity focused ultrasound versus robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a propensity score-matched study

Background: We compared the clinical outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and partial gland ablation (PGA) using high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in localized prostate cancer. Methods: We analyzed 3,859 patients who had undergone RARP and PGA using HIFU. According to the p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gyoohwan Jung, Jung Kwon Kim, Jong Jin Oh, Sangchul Lee, Seok-Soo Byun, Sung Kyu Hong, Hakmin Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-09-01
Series:Prostate International
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287888222000770
_version_ 1797682822263078912
author Gyoohwan Jung
Jung Kwon Kim
Jong Jin Oh
Sangchul Lee
Seok-Soo Byun
Sung Kyu Hong
Hakmin Lee
author_facet Gyoohwan Jung
Jung Kwon Kim
Jong Jin Oh
Sangchul Lee
Seok-Soo Byun
Sung Kyu Hong
Hakmin Lee
author_sort Gyoohwan Jung
collection DOAJ
description Background: We compared the clinical outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and partial gland ablation (PGA) using high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in localized prostate cancer. Methods: We analyzed 3,859 patients who had undergone RARP and PGA using HIFU. According to the propensity score for each treatment, 137 patients after PGA were matched to 3,722 patients after RARP at a 1:4 ratio using the nearest neighbor method. Results: The matched cohort comprised 685 subjects (RARP, 548; PGA, 137), with a median follow-up period of 22 months. Treatment failures were identified in 13.9% and 9.1% of patients in the PGA and RARP groups, respectively, after a median follow-up of 36 months postoperatively. Kaplan–Meier analyses revealed significantly longer failure-free (P < 0.001) and salvage-free survival (P = 0.003) in the RARP group than in the PGA group. There was no significant difference in the postoperative urinary symptom score (P = 0.748), but the postoperative erectile function score was significantly higher in the PGA group (P < 0.001). The rate of urinary incontinence (any pad) was significantly lower in the PGA group than that in the RARP group (P < 0.001). Postoperative complications were more frequent in the PGA group (P = 0.003); however, there was no significant difference in high-grade complications (≥3) (P = 0.467). Conclusion: PGA using HIFU showed statistically inferior oncological outcomes compared with RARP for failure-free survival and salvage-free survival. However, functional outcomes regarding postoperative incontinence and erectile dysfunction were more favorable in the PGA group.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T00:05:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a7763fef72f04eb987707f5b998200b3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2287-8882
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T00:05:24Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Prostate International
spelling doaj.art-a7763fef72f04eb987707f5b998200b32023-09-17T04:56:52ZengElsevierProstate International2287-88822023-09-01113134138Partial gland ablation using high-intensity focused ultrasound versus robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a propensity score-matched studyGyoohwan Jung0Jung Kwon Kim1Jong Jin Oh2Sangchul Lee3Seok-Soo Byun4Sung Kyu Hong5Hakmin Lee6Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, KoreaDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, KoreaDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, KoreaDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, KoreaDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea; Department of Medical Device Development, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, KoreaDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea; Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, KoreaDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea; Corresponding author. Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 173-82, Gumi-ro, Bundang-gu, Seongnam, 13620, KoreaBackground: We compared the clinical outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and partial gland ablation (PGA) using high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in localized prostate cancer. Methods: We analyzed 3,859 patients who had undergone RARP and PGA using HIFU. According to the propensity score for each treatment, 137 patients after PGA were matched to 3,722 patients after RARP at a 1:4 ratio using the nearest neighbor method. Results: The matched cohort comprised 685 subjects (RARP, 548; PGA, 137), with a median follow-up period of 22 months. Treatment failures were identified in 13.9% and 9.1% of patients in the PGA and RARP groups, respectively, after a median follow-up of 36 months postoperatively. Kaplan–Meier analyses revealed significantly longer failure-free (P < 0.001) and salvage-free survival (P = 0.003) in the RARP group than in the PGA group. There was no significant difference in the postoperative urinary symptom score (P = 0.748), but the postoperative erectile function score was significantly higher in the PGA group (P < 0.001). The rate of urinary incontinence (any pad) was significantly lower in the PGA group than that in the RARP group (P < 0.001). Postoperative complications were more frequent in the PGA group (P = 0.003); however, there was no significant difference in high-grade complications (≥3) (P = 0.467). Conclusion: PGA using HIFU showed statistically inferior oncological outcomes compared with RARP for failure-free survival and salvage-free survival. However, functional outcomes regarding postoperative incontinence and erectile dysfunction were more favorable in the PGA group.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287888222000770High-intensity focused ultrasound ablationOutcomeProstatectomyProstate cancerPropensity score
spellingShingle Gyoohwan Jung
Jung Kwon Kim
Jong Jin Oh
Sangchul Lee
Seok-Soo Byun
Sung Kyu Hong
Hakmin Lee
Partial gland ablation using high-intensity focused ultrasound versus robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a propensity score-matched study
Prostate International
High-intensity focused ultrasound ablation
Outcome
Prostatectomy
Prostate cancer
Propensity score
title Partial gland ablation using high-intensity focused ultrasound versus robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a propensity score-matched study
title_full Partial gland ablation using high-intensity focused ultrasound versus robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a propensity score-matched study
title_fullStr Partial gland ablation using high-intensity focused ultrasound versus robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a propensity score-matched study
title_full_unstemmed Partial gland ablation using high-intensity focused ultrasound versus robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a propensity score-matched study
title_short Partial gland ablation using high-intensity focused ultrasound versus robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a propensity score-matched study
title_sort partial gland ablation using high intensity focused ultrasound versus robot assisted radical prostatectomy a propensity score matched study
topic High-intensity focused ultrasound ablation
Outcome
Prostatectomy
Prostate cancer
Propensity score
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287888222000770
work_keys_str_mv AT gyoohwanjung partialglandablationusinghighintensityfocusedultrasoundversusrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyapropensityscorematchedstudy
AT jungkwonkim partialglandablationusinghighintensityfocusedultrasoundversusrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyapropensityscorematchedstudy
AT jongjinoh partialglandablationusinghighintensityfocusedultrasoundversusrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyapropensityscorematchedstudy
AT sangchullee partialglandablationusinghighintensityfocusedultrasoundversusrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyapropensityscorematchedstudy
AT seoksoobyun partialglandablationusinghighintensityfocusedultrasoundversusrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyapropensityscorematchedstudy
AT sungkyuhong partialglandablationusinghighintensityfocusedultrasoundversusrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyapropensityscorematchedstudy
AT hakminlee partialglandablationusinghighintensityfocusedultrasoundversusrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyapropensityscorematchedstudy