Can We Improve the Functional Threshold Power Test by Adding High-Intensity Priming Arm-Crank?

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of arm-crank induced priming on subsequent 20 min Functional Threshold Power Test among 11 well-trained male cyclists (18.8 ± 0.9 years; 182 ± 5 cm; 73.0 ± 6.6 kg; <i>V˙</i>O<sub>2max</sub> 67.9 ± 5.1 mL·kg<sup>−1...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dmitri Valiulin, Priit Purge, Peter Hofmann, Jarek Mäestu, Jaak Jürimäe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-10-01
Series:Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2411-5142/6/4/88
_version_ 1797503393145552896
author Dmitri Valiulin
Priit Purge
Peter Hofmann
Jarek Mäestu
Jaak Jürimäe
author_facet Dmitri Valiulin
Priit Purge
Peter Hofmann
Jarek Mäestu
Jaak Jürimäe
author_sort Dmitri Valiulin
collection DOAJ
description The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of arm-crank induced priming on subsequent 20 min Functional Threshold Power Test among 11 well-trained male cyclists (18.8 ± 0.9 years; 182 ± 5 cm; 73.0 ± 6.6 kg; <i>V˙</i>O<sub>2max</sub> 67.9 ± 5.1 mL·kg<sup>−1</sup>·min<sup>−1</sup>). Participants completed an incremental test and two maximal performance tests (MPTs) in a randomized order. Warm-up prior to MPT<sub>low</sub> consisted of 20 min aerobic exercise and 25 s high-intensity all-out arm crank effort was added to warm-up in MPT<sub>high</sub>. Constant intensities for the first 17 min of MPT were targeting to achieve a similar relative fatigue according to participants’ physiological capacity before the last 3 min all-out spurt. Final 3 min all-out spurt power was 4.94 ± 0.27 W·kg<sup>−1</sup> and 4.85 ± 0.39 W·kg<sup>−1</sup> in MPT<sub>low</sub> and MPT<sub>high</sub>, respectively (not statistically different: <i>p</i> = 0.116; <i>d</i> = 0.5). Blood lactate [La] levels just before the start were higher (<i>p</i> < 0.001; <i>d</i> = 2.6) in MPT<sub>high</sub> (5.6 ± 0.5 mmol·L<sup>−1</sup>) compared to MPT<sub>low</sub> (1.1 ± 0.1 mmol·L<sup>−1</sup>). According to <i>V</i><i>˙</i>CO<sub>2</sub> and net [La] data, significantly higher anaerobic energy production was detected among MPT<sub>low</sub> condition. In conclusion, priming significantly reduced anaerobic energy contribution but did neither improve nor decrease group mean performance although effects were variable. We suggest priming to have beneficial effects based on previous studies; however, the effects are individual and additional studies are needed to distinguish such detailed effects in single athletes.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T03:49:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a779224e883e4b5b97e531a20ada50da
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2411-5142
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T03:49:59Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
spelling doaj.art-a779224e883e4b5b97e531a20ada50da2023-11-23T09:00:12ZengMDPI AGJournal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology2411-51422021-10-01648810.3390/jfmk6040088Can We Improve the Functional Threshold Power Test by Adding High-Intensity Priming Arm-Crank?Dmitri Valiulin0Priit Purge1Peter Hofmann2Jarek Mäestu3Jaak Jürimäe4Institute of Sport Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tartu, 51008 Tartu, EstoniaInstitute of Sport Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tartu, 51008 Tartu, EstoniaTraining & Training Therapy Research Group, Institute of Human Movement Science, Sports & Health, Exercise Physiology, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, AustriaInstitute of Sport Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tartu, 51008 Tartu, EstoniaInstitute of Sport Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tartu, 51008 Tartu, EstoniaThe aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of arm-crank induced priming on subsequent 20 min Functional Threshold Power Test among 11 well-trained male cyclists (18.8 ± 0.9 years; 182 ± 5 cm; 73.0 ± 6.6 kg; <i>V˙</i>O<sub>2max</sub> 67.9 ± 5.1 mL·kg<sup>−1</sup>·min<sup>−1</sup>). Participants completed an incremental test and two maximal performance tests (MPTs) in a randomized order. Warm-up prior to MPT<sub>low</sub> consisted of 20 min aerobic exercise and 25 s high-intensity all-out arm crank effort was added to warm-up in MPT<sub>high</sub>. Constant intensities for the first 17 min of MPT were targeting to achieve a similar relative fatigue according to participants’ physiological capacity before the last 3 min all-out spurt. Final 3 min all-out spurt power was 4.94 ± 0.27 W·kg<sup>−1</sup> and 4.85 ± 0.39 W·kg<sup>−1</sup> in MPT<sub>low</sub> and MPT<sub>high</sub>, respectively (not statistically different: <i>p</i> = 0.116; <i>d</i> = 0.5). Blood lactate [La] levels just before the start were higher (<i>p</i> < 0.001; <i>d</i> = 2.6) in MPT<sub>high</sub> (5.6 ± 0.5 mmol·L<sup>−1</sup>) compared to MPT<sub>low</sub> (1.1 ± 0.1 mmol·L<sup>−1</sup>). According to <i>V</i><i>˙</i>CO<sub>2</sub> and net [La] data, significantly higher anaerobic energy production was detected among MPT<sub>low</sub> condition. In conclusion, priming significantly reduced anaerobic energy contribution but did neither improve nor decrease group mean performance although effects were variable. We suggest priming to have beneficial effects based on previous studies; however, the effects are individual and additional studies are needed to distinguish such detailed effects in single athletes.https://www.mdpi.com/2411-5142/6/4/88warm-up exerciselactic acidanaerobic thresholdathletic performance
spellingShingle Dmitri Valiulin
Priit Purge
Peter Hofmann
Jarek Mäestu
Jaak Jürimäe
Can We Improve the Functional Threshold Power Test by Adding High-Intensity Priming Arm-Crank?
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
warm-up exercise
lactic acid
anaerobic threshold
athletic performance
title Can We Improve the Functional Threshold Power Test by Adding High-Intensity Priming Arm-Crank?
title_full Can We Improve the Functional Threshold Power Test by Adding High-Intensity Priming Arm-Crank?
title_fullStr Can We Improve the Functional Threshold Power Test by Adding High-Intensity Priming Arm-Crank?
title_full_unstemmed Can We Improve the Functional Threshold Power Test by Adding High-Intensity Priming Arm-Crank?
title_short Can We Improve the Functional Threshold Power Test by Adding High-Intensity Priming Arm-Crank?
title_sort can we improve the functional threshold power test by adding high intensity priming arm crank
topic warm-up exercise
lactic acid
anaerobic threshold
athletic performance
url https://www.mdpi.com/2411-5142/6/4/88
work_keys_str_mv AT dmitrivaliulin canweimprovethefunctionalthresholdpowertestbyaddinghighintensityprimingarmcrank
AT priitpurge canweimprovethefunctionalthresholdpowertestbyaddinghighintensityprimingarmcrank
AT peterhofmann canweimprovethefunctionalthresholdpowertestbyaddinghighintensityprimingarmcrank
AT jarekmaestu canweimprovethefunctionalthresholdpowertestbyaddinghighintensityprimingarmcrank
AT jaakjurimae canweimprovethefunctionalthresholdpowertestbyaddinghighintensityprimingarmcrank