P‐wave indices as predictors of atrial fibrillation

Abstract Background P‐wave duration (PDURATION) and P‐wave area (PAREA) have been linked to risk of atrial fibrillation (AF), but they do not improve the efficacy of Framingham AF risk score. We suggest the incorporation of both variables in one index, the P‐wave area/P‐wave duration (PAREA/DURATION...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maria Uggen Rasmussen, Preman Kumarathurai, Andreas Fabricius‐Bjerre, Bjørn Strøier Larsen, Helena Domínguez, Ulla Davidsen, Thomas Alexander Gerds, Jørgen K. Kanters, Ahmad Sajadieh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-09-01
Series:Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/anec.12751
_version_ 1797802937982910464
author Maria Uggen Rasmussen
Preman Kumarathurai
Andreas Fabricius‐Bjerre
Bjørn Strøier Larsen
Helena Domínguez
Ulla Davidsen
Thomas Alexander Gerds
Jørgen K. Kanters
Ahmad Sajadieh
author_facet Maria Uggen Rasmussen
Preman Kumarathurai
Andreas Fabricius‐Bjerre
Bjørn Strøier Larsen
Helena Domínguez
Ulla Davidsen
Thomas Alexander Gerds
Jørgen K. Kanters
Ahmad Sajadieh
author_sort Maria Uggen Rasmussen
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background P‐wave duration (PDURATION) and P‐wave area (PAREA) have been linked to risk of atrial fibrillation (AF), but they do not improve the efficacy of Framingham AF risk score. We suggest the incorporation of both variables in one index, the P‐wave area/P‐wave duration (PAREA/DURATION) index, which may be considered an expression of the average amplitude of the P wave that reflects aspects of P‐wave morphology. Objective To assess the prognostic value of P‐wave area/P‐wave duration index (PAREA/DURATION index) in lead II together with other P‐wave indices (PWIs) in incidence of AF in the Copenhagen Holter Study. Methods The study included 632 men and women, between 55 and 75 years with no apparent heart disease or AF. Baseline standard 12‐lead Electrocardiography (ECGs) were analyzed manually. Results The median follow‐up time was 14.7 (14.5;14.9) years. A total of 68 cases of AF and 233 cases of death were recorded. The restricted cubic spline method showed a U‐shaped association between PAREA/DURATION and rate of AF. The lowest quintile of PAREA/DURATION index in lead II was associated with increased rate of AF, HR 2.80 (1.64–4.79). The addition of the new index to the Framingham model for AF improved the model in this population. The PAREA in lead II in its lowest quintile was also associated with increased rate of AF, HR 2.16 (1.25–3.75), but did not improve the Framingham model. PDURATION and P‐wave terminal force (PTF) were not significantly associated with AF. Conclusion A flat P wave as expressed by a small PAREA/DURATION index in lead II is associated with increased rate of incident AF beyond known AF risk factors.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T05:13:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a78129ea52674d3a8afd0636a3875658
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1082-720X
1542-474X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T05:13:19Z
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology
spelling doaj.art-a78129ea52674d3a8afd0636a38756582023-06-16T04:06:08ZengWileyAnnals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology1082-720X1542-474X2020-09-01255n/an/a10.1111/anec.12751P‐wave indices as predictors of atrial fibrillationMaria Uggen Rasmussen0Preman Kumarathurai1Andreas Fabricius‐Bjerre2Bjørn Strøier Larsen3Helena Domínguez4Ulla Davidsen5Thomas Alexander Gerds6Jørgen K. Kanters7Ahmad Sajadieh8Department of Cardiology Copenhagen University Hospital of Bispebjerg Copenhagen DenmarkDepartment of Cardiology Copenhagen University Hospital of Bispebjerg Copenhagen DenmarkDepartment of Cardiology Copenhagen University Hospital of Bispebjerg Copenhagen DenmarkDepartment of Cardiology Copenhagen University Hospital of Bispebjerg Copenhagen DenmarkDepartment of Cardiology Copenhagen University Hospital of Bispebjerg Copenhagen DenmarkDepartment of Cardiology Copenhagen University Hospital of Bispebjerg Copenhagen DenmarkDepartment of Biostatistics University of Copenhagen Copenhagen DenmarkLaboratory of Experimental Cardiology Department of Biomedical Sciences University of Copenhagen Copenhagen DenmarkDepartment of Cardiology Copenhagen University Hospital of Bispebjerg Copenhagen DenmarkAbstract Background P‐wave duration (PDURATION) and P‐wave area (PAREA) have been linked to risk of atrial fibrillation (AF), but they do not improve the efficacy of Framingham AF risk score. We suggest the incorporation of both variables in one index, the P‐wave area/P‐wave duration (PAREA/DURATION) index, which may be considered an expression of the average amplitude of the P wave that reflects aspects of P‐wave morphology. Objective To assess the prognostic value of P‐wave area/P‐wave duration index (PAREA/DURATION index) in lead II together with other P‐wave indices (PWIs) in incidence of AF in the Copenhagen Holter Study. Methods The study included 632 men and women, between 55 and 75 years with no apparent heart disease or AF. Baseline standard 12‐lead Electrocardiography (ECGs) were analyzed manually. Results The median follow‐up time was 14.7 (14.5;14.9) years. A total of 68 cases of AF and 233 cases of death were recorded. The restricted cubic spline method showed a U‐shaped association between PAREA/DURATION and rate of AF. The lowest quintile of PAREA/DURATION index in lead II was associated with increased rate of AF, HR 2.80 (1.64–4.79). The addition of the new index to the Framingham model for AF improved the model in this population. The PAREA in lead II in its lowest quintile was also associated with increased rate of AF, HR 2.16 (1.25–3.75), but did not improve the Framingham model. PDURATION and P‐wave terminal force (PTF) were not significantly associated with AF. Conclusion A flat P wave as expressed by a small PAREA/DURATION index in lead II is associated with increased rate of incident AF beyond known AF risk factors.https://doi.org/10.1111/anec.12751atrial fibrillationelectrocardiographyP waveP‐wave indices
spellingShingle Maria Uggen Rasmussen
Preman Kumarathurai
Andreas Fabricius‐Bjerre
Bjørn Strøier Larsen
Helena Domínguez
Ulla Davidsen
Thomas Alexander Gerds
Jørgen K. Kanters
Ahmad Sajadieh
P‐wave indices as predictors of atrial fibrillation
Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology
atrial fibrillation
electrocardiography
P wave
P‐wave indices
title P‐wave indices as predictors of atrial fibrillation
title_full P‐wave indices as predictors of atrial fibrillation
title_fullStr P‐wave indices as predictors of atrial fibrillation
title_full_unstemmed P‐wave indices as predictors of atrial fibrillation
title_short P‐wave indices as predictors of atrial fibrillation
title_sort p wave indices as predictors of atrial fibrillation
topic atrial fibrillation
electrocardiography
P wave
P‐wave indices
url https://doi.org/10.1111/anec.12751
work_keys_str_mv AT mariauggenrasmussen pwaveindicesaspredictorsofatrialfibrillation
AT premankumarathurai pwaveindicesaspredictorsofatrialfibrillation
AT andreasfabriciusbjerre pwaveindicesaspredictorsofatrialfibrillation
AT bjørnstrøierlarsen pwaveindicesaspredictorsofatrialfibrillation
AT helenadominguez pwaveindicesaspredictorsofatrialfibrillation
AT ulladavidsen pwaveindicesaspredictorsofatrialfibrillation
AT thomasalexandergerds pwaveindicesaspredictorsofatrialfibrillation
AT jørgenkkanters pwaveindicesaspredictorsofatrialfibrillation
AT ahmadsajadieh pwaveindicesaspredictorsofatrialfibrillation