Strategies for Russia and Russia

In this article we use the 100th anniversary of the development and approval of the GOELRO plan, the plan to electrify Russia (State Commission for the Electrification of Russia), as a cause to discuss the role of strategic planning in determining the economic destiny of our nation. Another reason f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pavel Aleksandrovich Minakir
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Economic Research Institute of the Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences 2021-04-01
Series:Prostranstvennaâ Èkonomika
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.spatial-economics.com/images/spatial-econimics/2021_1/SE.2021.1.007-017.Minakir.pdf
_version_ 1818732883494305792
author Pavel Aleksandrovich Minakir
author_facet Pavel Aleksandrovich Minakir
author_sort Pavel Aleksandrovich Minakir
collection DOAJ
description In this article we use the 100th anniversary of the development and approval of the GOELRO plan, the plan to electrify Russia (State Commission for the Electrification of Russia), as a cause to discuss the role of strategic planning in determining the economic destiny of our nation. Another reason for this is, of course, the lingering economic crisis in Russia and the inability to escape its grasp despite the growing number of strategies, programs, and projects being developed in Russia. The article suggests picking three points in time that were truly important for making fundamental decisions concerning the main development of the country for the subsequent years. The article proposes to consider these decisions, dating back to the early 1920-s, 1950-s, 1990-s, development strategies (strategies 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 respectively). The comparative analysis of their specific features, and conditions (internal and external) under which the strategies were developed and implemented, allowed the author to draw a line between first two strategies and the 1990-s strategy, and to formulate requirements for a new strategy (4.0). This new strategy is urgently needed not only for the economic recovery, but for constructing the economy that would make Russia one of the leading global economies. It should not only be able to provide the economy with opportunities for endogenous growth, but also for effective social development. In this regard, some thoughts are given on the recently published policy report on the strategic basis of the Russian economy development. The report is not, technically, a long-term economic development strategy, but by the expert community and the media it is perceived as a strategy for a certain ‘U-turn’ of the Russian economy
first_indexed 2024-12-17T23:40:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a7830e3249ee4c8c95e91f61043b3d65
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1815-9834
2587-5957
language Russian
last_indexed 2024-12-17T23:40:39Z
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher Economic Research Institute of the Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
record_format Article
series Prostranstvennaâ Èkonomika
spelling doaj.art-a7830e3249ee4c8c95e91f61043b3d652022-12-21T21:28:27ZrusEconomic Research Institute of the Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of SciencesProstranstvennaâ Èkonomika1815-98342587-59572021-04-0117171710.14530/se.2021.1.007-017Strategies for Russia and RussiaPavel Aleksandrovich Minakir0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5451-5662Economic Research Institute FEB RASIn this article we use the 100th anniversary of the development and approval of the GOELRO plan, the plan to electrify Russia (State Commission for the Electrification of Russia), as a cause to discuss the role of strategic planning in determining the economic destiny of our nation. Another reason for this is, of course, the lingering economic crisis in Russia and the inability to escape its grasp despite the growing number of strategies, programs, and projects being developed in Russia. The article suggests picking three points in time that were truly important for making fundamental decisions concerning the main development of the country for the subsequent years. The article proposes to consider these decisions, dating back to the early 1920-s, 1950-s, 1990-s, development strategies (strategies 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 respectively). The comparative analysis of their specific features, and conditions (internal and external) under which the strategies were developed and implemented, allowed the author to draw a line between first two strategies and the 1990-s strategy, and to formulate requirements for a new strategy (4.0). This new strategy is urgently needed not only for the economic recovery, but for constructing the economy that would make Russia one of the leading global economies. It should not only be able to provide the economy with opportunities for endogenous growth, but also for effective social development. In this regard, some thoughts are given on the recently published policy report on the strategic basis of the Russian economy development. The report is not, technically, a long-term economic development strategy, but by the expert community and the media it is perceived as a strategy for a certain ‘U-turn’ of the Russian economyhttp://www.spatial-economics.com/images/spatial-econimics/2021_1/SE.2021.1.007-017.Minakir.pdfstrategyplangoelro planeconomic developmentsocial development goalsrussia
spellingShingle Pavel Aleksandrovich Minakir
Strategies for Russia and Russia
Prostranstvennaâ Èkonomika
strategy
plan
goelro plan
economic development
social development goals
russia
title Strategies for Russia and Russia
title_full Strategies for Russia and Russia
title_fullStr Strategies for Russia and Russia
title_full_unstemmed Strategies for Russia and Russia
title_short Strategies for Russia and Russia
title_sort strategies for russia and russia
topic strategy
plan
goelro plan
economic development
social development goals
russia
url http://www.spatial-economics.com/images/spatial-econimics/2021_1/SE.2021.1.007-017.Minakir.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT pavelaleksandrovichminakir strategiesforrussiaandrussia