Physical function patient‐reported outcomes among adolescent and young adult cancer survivors: A systematic review

Abstract Background The physical challenges faced by adolescents and young adults (AYA) after a cancer diagnosis may be different from those experienced by paediatric and older adult cancer patients. Patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) are valuable tools that can be useful in exploring the exp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sarah Tanner, Teyl Engstrom, Cheryl Forbes, Dhaval Patel, Wen Ray Lee, Rick Walker, Natalie Bradford, Jason D. Pole
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-03-01
Series:Cancer Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.7046
_version_ 1797242768321413120
author Sarah Tanner
Teyl Engstrom
Cheryl Forbes
Dhaval Patel
Wen Ray Lee
Rick Walker
Natalie Bradford
Jason D. Pole
author_facet Sarah Tanner
Teyl Engstrom
Cheryl Forbes
Dhaval Patel
Wen Ray Lee
Rick Walker
Natalie Bradford
Jason D. Pole
author_sort Sarah Tanner
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The physical challenges faced by adolescents and young adults (AYA) after a cancer diagnosis may be different from those experienced by paediatric and older adult cancer patients. Patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) are valuable tools that can be useful in exploring the experiences of AYAs and identifying important issues, recurrent themes and areas to potentially improve quality of life. Objective We compared patient‐reported physical function outcomes between AYAs diagnosed with cancer and non‐cancer controls. Method This paper builds on a scoping review published in early 2023 and focuses on PROMs related to physical function. Results This systematic review includes 16 studies that measured and reported on physical function PROMs in AYA cancer survivors compared with their cancer‐free peers. Of these studies, 14 found that physical function in AYA survivors was significantly worse. This paper also includes a meta‐analysis conducted on 5 studies using the EORTC‐QLQ‐C30 to measure physical function, which found that physical function score was an average of 7.03 (95% CI: −10.21, −3.86) points lower in the AYA cancer group, compared to their cancer free‐peers, a difference that is clinically meaningful. Conclusions The results overwhelmingly demonstrate that AYAs post a cancer diagnosis have worse health‐related quality of life from a physical function perspective than their cancer‐free peers, providing a compelling argument for the need to address this issue. All but one of the studies were cross‐sectional, which highlights the need for further assessment of this group longitudinally throughout their cancer journey.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T18:44:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a78de6fd75a641a58157218d4643de37
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-7634
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T18:44:28Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Cancer Medicine
spelling doaj.art-a78de6fd75a641a58157218d4643de372024-03-27T07:32:40ZengWileyCancer Medicine2045-76342024-03-01136n/an/a10.1002/cam4.7046Physical function patient‐reported outcomes among adolescent and young adult cancer survivors: A systematic reviewSarah Tanner0Teyl Engstrom1Cheryl Forbes2Dhaval Patel3Wen Ray Lee4Rick Walker5Natalie Bradford6Jason D. Pole7Centre for Health Services Research The University of Queensland Herston Queensland AustraliaCentre for Health Services Research The University of Queensland Herston Queensland AustraliaCentre for Health Services Research The University of Queensland Herston Queensland AustraliaCentre for Health Services Research The University of Queensland Herston Queensland AustraliaChild Health Research Centre The University of Queensland South Brisbane Queensland AustraliaSchool of Medicine The University of Queensland Herston Queensland AustraliaCancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre at Centre for Children's Health Research Queensland University of Technology Brisbane Queensland AustraliaCentre for Health Services Research The University of Queensland Herston Queensland AustraliaAbstract Background The physical challenges faced by adolescents and young adults (AYA) after a cancer diagnosis may be different from those experienced by paediatric and older adult cancer patients. Patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) are valuable tools that can be useful in exploring the experiences of AYAs and identifying important issues, recurrent themes and areas to potentially improve quality of life. Objective We compared patient‐reported physical function outcomes between AYAs diagnosed with cancer and non‐cancer controls. Method This paper builds on a scoping review published in early 2023 and focuses on PROMs related to physical function. Results This systematic review includes 16 studies that measured and reported on physical function PROMs in AYA cancer survivors compared with their cancer‐free peers. Of these studies, 14 found that physical function in AYA survivors was significantly worse. This paper also includes a meta‐analysis conducted on 5 studies using the EORTC‐QLQ‐C30 to measure physical function, which found that physical function score was an average of 7.03 (95% CI: −10.21, −3.86) points lower in the AYA cancer group, compared to their cancer free‐peers, a difference that is clinically meaningful. Conclusions The results overwhelmingly demonstrate that AYAs post a cancer diagnosis have worse health‐related quality of life from a physical function perspective than their cancer‐free peers, providing a compelling argument for the need to address this issue. All but one of the studies were cross‐sectional, which highlights the need for further assessment of this group longitudinally throughout their cancer journey.https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.7046adolescentcancercancer survivorspatient‐reported outcome measuresphysical functionroutinely collected health data
spellingShingle Sarah Tanner
Teyl Engstrom
Cheryl Forbes
Dhaval Patel
Wen Ray Lee
Rick Walker
Natalie Bradford
Jason D. Pole
Physical function patient‐reported outcomes among adolescent and young adult cancer survivors: A systematic review
Cancer Medicine
adolescent
cancer
cancer survivors
patient‐reported outcome measures
physical function
routinely collected health data
title Physical function patient‐reported outcomes among adolescent and young adult cancer survivors: A systematic review
title_full Physical function patient‐reported outcomes among adolescent and young adult cancer survivors: A systematic review
title_fullStr Physical function patient‐reported outcomes among adolescent and young adult cancer survivors: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Physical function patient‐reported outcomes among adolescent and young adult cancer survivors: A systematic review
title_short Physical function patient‐reported outcomes among adolescent and young adult cancer survivors: A systematic review
title_sort physical function patient reported outcomes among adolescent and young adult cancer survivors a systematic review
topic adolescent
cancer
cancer survivors
patient‐reported outcome measures
physical function
routinely collected health data
url https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.7046
work_keys_str_mv AT sarahtanner physicalfunctionpatientreportedoutcomesamongadolescentandyoungadultcancersurvivorsasystematicreview
AT teylengstrom physicalfunctionpatientreportedoutcomesamongadolescentandyoungadultcancersurvivorsasystematicreview
AT cherylforbes physicalfunctionpatientreportedoutcomesamongadolescentandyoungadultcancersurvivorsasystematicreview
AT dhavalpatel physicalfunctionpatientreportedoutcomesamongadolescentandyoungadultcancersurvivorsasystematicreview
AT wenraylee physicalfunctionpatientreportedoutcomesamongadolescentandyoungadultcancersurvivorsasystematicreview
AT rickwalker physicalfunctionpatientreportedoutcomesamongadolescentandyoungadultcancersurvivorsasystematicreview
AT nataliebradford physicalfunctionpatientreportedoutcomesamongadolescentandyoungadultcancersurvivorsasystematicreview
AT jasondpole physicalfunctionpatientreportedoutcomesamongadolescentandyoungadultcancersurvivorsasystematicreview