Perceptions of important outcomes of moral case deliberations: a qualitative study among healthcare professionals in childhood cancer care

Abstract Background In childhood cancer care, healthcare professionals must deal with several difficult moral situations in clinical practice. Previous studies show that morally difficult challenges are related to decisions on treatment limitations, infringing on the child's integrity and growi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Charlotte Weiner, Pernilla Pergert, Bert Molewijk, Anders Castor, Cecilia Bartholdson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-03-01
Series:BMC Medical Ethics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00597-4
_version_ 1818565817126617088
author Charlotte Weiner
Pernilla Pergert
Bert Molewijk
Anders Castor
Cecilia Bartholdson
author_facet Charlotte Weiner
Pernilla Pergert
Bert Molewijk
Anders Castor
Cecilia Bartholdson
author_sort Charlotte Weiner
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background In childhood cancer care, healthcare professionals must deal with several difficult moral situations in clinical practice. Previous studies show that morally difficult challenges are related to decisions on treatment limitations, infringing on the child's integrity and growing autonomy, and interprofessional conflicts. Research also shows that healthcare professionals have expressed a need for clinical ethics support to help them deal with morally difficult situations. Moral case deliberations (MCDs) are one example of ethics support. The aim of this study was to describe the MCD-related outcomes that healthcare professionals in childhood cancer care considered important, before MCDs were implemented, in order to facilitate the implementation of MCDs in childhood cancer care in Sweden. Methods This study is based on qualitative data. Healthcare professionals, mostly representing registered nurses, nursing assistants and physicians, working at childhood cancer care centres in Sweden, were invited to respond to the translated and content validated European MCD Outcomes Instrument, before participating in regular MCDs. Answers to the main open-ended question, included in the questionnaire, was analysed according to systematic text condensation. Results Data was collected from 161 responses from the healthcare professionals. The responses included healthcare professionals’ perceptions of which MCD-related outcomes they found important for handling moral challenges. Three different themes of important outcomes from the analysis of the data are presented as follows: Interprofessional well-being in team interactions on a team level; Professional comfort when dealing with moral challenges on a personal level; and Improved quality of care for the child and the family on a care level. Conclusions Healthcare professionals in childhood cancer care considered it important that ethics support could enhance the well-being of interprofessional teams, support healthcare professionals on an individual level and improve quality of care. The results of this study can be used in current and future training for MCD-facilitators. When knowing the context specific important MCD-outcomes, the sessions could be adapted. Managers in childhood cancer care would benefit from knowing about the specific important outcomes for their target group because they could then create relevant working conditions for clinical ethics support.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T01:45:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a78f5cacc5714bf9914e03bd7fb5ae9b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6939
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T01:45:48Z
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Medical Ethics
spelling doaj.art-a78f5cacc5714bf9914e03bd7fb5ae9b2022-12-21T23:21:35ZengBMCBMC Medical Ethics1472-69392021-03-0122111110.1186/s12910-021-00597-4Perceptions of important outcomes of moral case deliberations: a qualitative study among healthcare professionals in childhood cancer careCharlotte Weiner0Pernilla Pergert1Bert Molewijk2Anders Castor3Cecilia Bartholdson4Childhood Cancer Research Unit, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Karolinska InstitutetChildhood Cancer Research Unit, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Karolinska InstitutetDepartment of Medical Humanities, Amsterdam University Medical CentersPaediatrics, Lund UniversityChildhood Cancer Research Unit, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Karolinska InstitutetAbstract Background In childhood cancer care, healthcare professionals must deal with several difficult moral situations in clinical practice. Previous studies show that morally difficult challenges are related to decisions on treatment limitations, infringing on the child's integrity and growing autonomy, and interprofessional conflicts. Research also shows that healthcare professionals have expressed a need for clinical ethics support to help them deal with morally difficult situations. Moral case deliberations (MCDs) are one example of ethics support. The aim of this study was to describe the MCD-related outcomes that healthcare professionals in childhood cancer care considered important, before MCDs were implemented, in order to facilitate the implementation of MCDs in childhood cancer care in Sweden. Methods This study is based on qualitative data. Healthcare professionals, mostly representing registered nurses, nursing assistants and physicians, working at childhood cancer care centres in Sweden, were invited to respond to the translated and content validated European MCD Outcomes Instrument, before participating in regular MCDs. Answers to the main open-ended question, included in the questionnaire, was analysed according to systematic text condensation. Results Data was collected from 161 responses from the healthcare professionals. The responses included healthcare professionals’ perceptions of which MCD-related outcomes they found important for handling moral challenges. Three different themes of important outcomes from the analysis of the data are presented as follows: Interprofessional well-being in team interactions on a team level; Professional comfort when dealing with moral challenges on a personal level; and Improved quality of care for the child and the family on a care level. Conclusions Healthcare professionals in childhood cancer care considered it important that ethics support could enhance the well-being of interprofessional teams, support healthcare professionals on an individual level and improve quality of care. The results of this study can be used in current and future training for MCD-facilitators. When knowing the context specific important MCD-outcomes, the sessions could be adapted. Managers in childhood cancer care would benefit from knowing about the specific important outcomes for their target group because they could then create relevant working conditions for clinical ethics support.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00597-4Childhood cancer careClinical ethicsClinical ethics supportHealthcare professionalsMoral case deliberationsMoral challanges
spellingShingle Charlotte Weiner
Pernilla Pergert
Bert Molewijk
Anders Castor
Cecilia Bartholdson
Perceptions of important outcomes of moral case deliberations: a qualitative study among healthcare professionals in childhood cancer care
BMC Medical Ethics
Childhood cancer care
Clinical ethics
Clinical ethics support
Healthcare professionals
Moral case deliberations
Moral challanges
title Perceptions of important outcomes of moral case deliberations: a qualitative study among healthcare professionals in childhood cancer care
title_full Perceptions of important outcomes of moral case deliberations: a qualitative study among healthcare professionals in childhood cancer care
title_fullStr Perceptions of important outcomes of moral case deliberations: a qualitative study among healthcare professionals in childhood cancer care
title_full_unstemmed Perceptions of important outcomes of moral case deliberations: a qualitative study among healthcare professionals in childhood cancer care
title_short Perceptions of important outcomes of moral case deliberations: a qualitative study among healthcare professionals in childhood cancer care
title_sort perceptions of important outcomes of moral case deliberations a qualitative study among healthcare professionals in childhood cancer care
topic Childhood cancer care
Clinical ethics
Clinical ethics support
Healthcare professionals
Moral case deliberations
Moral challanges
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00597-4
work_keys_str_mv AT charlotteweiner perceptionsofimportantoutcomesofmoralcasedeliberationsaqualitativestudyamonghealthcareprofessionalsinchildhoodcancercare
AT pernillapergert perceptionsofimportantoutcomesofmoralcasedeliberationsaqualitativestudyamonghealthcareprofessionalsinchildhoodcancercare
AT bertmolewijk perceptionsofimportantoutcomesofmoralcasedeliberationsaqualitativestudyamonghealthcareprofessionalsinchildhoodcancercare
AT anderscastor perceptionsofimportantoutcomesofmoralcasedeliberationsaqualitativestudyamonghealthcareprofessionalsinchildhoodcancercare
AT ceciliabartholdson perceptionsofimportantoutcomesofmoralcasedeliberationsaqualitativestudyamonghealthcareprofessionalsinchildhoodcancercare