To Evaluate the Different Rapid Screening Tests for Diagnosis of Leptospirosis

Introduction: Leptospirosis is an acute febrile disease, in tropical and sub-tropical regions of world. It has been underreported in India, due to presence of non-specific symptoms and unavailability of appropriate laboratory diagnostic facilities in most part of the country. The diagnosis of lep...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tanvi Panwala, Sangeeta Rajdev, Summaiya Mulla
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited 2015-02-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/5587/11188_CE(RA1)_F(T)_PF1(NJAK)_PFA(AK)_PF2(PAG).pdf
_version_ 1828849035548557312
author Tanvi Panwala
Sangeeta Rajdev
Summaiya Mulla
author_facet Tanvi Panwala
Sangeeta Rajdev
Summaiya Mulla
author_sort Tanvi Panwala
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Leptospirosis is an acute febrile disease, in tropical and sub-tropical regions of world. It has been underreported in India, due to presence of non-specific symptoms and unavailability of appropriate laboratory diagnostic facilities in most part of the country. The diagnosis of leptospirosis is usually based on demonstration of antibodies by different serological tests. Aim: The present study aims to evaluate and compare commercially available rapid test. Design and Settings: Case control study. Materials and Methods: Three screening tests (Leptocheck WB, Latex agglutination test and SD leptospira) were compared by using 100 serum samples randomly obtained from clinical cases of Leptospirosis admitted in new civil hospital, Surat, Gujarat. All the patients with acute Leptospirosis were included in this 4-months pilot study from July 2011 to October 2011. All the results were compared with IgM ELISA and MAT for confirmation of diagnosis. Results: Leptocheck WB, Latex agglutination test and SD leptospira had sensitivities of 84.8%, 84.8% and 72.7% & specificities of 37.3%, 71.2% and 71.2% respectively as compared to MAT. Leptocheck WB, Latex agglutination test and SD leptospira had sensitivities of 90.7%, 89.7% and 53.7% & specificities of 93.4%, 90.9% and 60% respectively as compared to IgM ELISA. Conclusion: Latex agglutination test kit and Leptocheck WB were found to be highly sensitive and specific. Neither of these tests require specialized equipment, and could be performed in peripheral laboratories with relatively little expertise.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T22:42:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a79ca0b95d4b4c6ba6ebe8d823ad22a6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2249-782X
0973-709X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T22:42:39Z
publishDate 2015-02-01
publisher JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
spelling doaj.art-a79ca0b95d4b4c6ba6ebe8d823ad22a62022-12-22T00:09:18ZengJCDR Research and Publications Private LimitedJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research2249-782X0973-709X2015-02-0192DC21DC2410.7860/JCDR/2015/11188.5587To Evaluate the Different Rapid Screening Tests for Diagnosis of LeptospirosisTanvi Panwala0Sangeeta Rajdev1Summaiya Mulla2Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College, Surat, India.Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College, Surat, India.Professor and Head, Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College, Surat, India.Introduction: Leptospirosis is an acute febrile disease, in tropical and sub-tropical regions of world. It has been underreported in India, due to presence of non-specific symptoms and unavailability of appropriate laboratory diagnostic facilities in most part of the country. The diagnosis of leptospirosis is usually based on demonstration of antibodies by different serological tests. Aim: The present study aims to evaluate and compare commercially available rapid test. Design and Settings: Case control study. Materials and Methods: Three screening tests (Leptocheck WB, Latex agglutination test and SD leptospira) were compared by using 100 serum samples randomly obtained from clinical cases of Leptospirosis admitted in new civil hospital, Surat, Gujarat. All the patients with acute Leptospirosis were included in this 4-months pilot study from July 2011 to October 2011. All the results were compared with IgM ELISA and MAT for confirmation of diagnosis. Results: Leptocheck WB, Latex agglutination test and SD leptospira had sensitivities of 84.8%, 84.8% and 72.7% & specificities of 37.3%, 71.2% and 71.2% respectively as compared to MAT. Leptocheck WB, Latex agglutination test and SD leptospira had sensitivities of 90.7%, 89.7% and 53.7% & specificities of 93.4%, 90.9% and 60% respectively as compared to IgM ELISA. Conclusion: Latex agglutination test kit and Leptocheck WB were found to be highly sensitive and specific. Neither of these tests require specialized equipment, and could be performed in peripheral laboratories with relatively little expertise.https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/5587/11188_CE(RA1)_F(T)_PF1(NJAK)_PFA(AK)_PF2(PAG).pdfigm elisaleptospirosisleptorapideleptocheckmatsd leptospira igm/igg
spellingShingle Tanvi Panwala
Sangeeta Rajdev
Summaiya Mulla
To Evaluate the Different Rapid Screening Tests for Diagnosis of Leptospirosis
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
igm elisa
leptospirosis
leptorapide
leptocheck
mat
sd leptospira igm/igg
title To Evaluate the Different Rapid Screening Tests for Diagnosis of Leptospirosis
title_full To Evaluate the Different Rapid Screening Tests for Diagnosis of Leptospirosis
title_fullStr To Evaluate the Different Rapid Screening Tests for Diagnosis of Leptospirosis
title_full_unstemmed To Evaluate the Different Rapid Screening Tests for Diagnosis of Leptospirosis
title_short To Evaluate the Different Rapid Screening Tests for Diagnosis of Leptospirosis
title_sort to evaluate the different rapid screening tests for diagnosis of leptospirosis
topic igm elisa
leptospirosis
leptorapide
leptocheck
mat
sd leptospira igm/igg
url https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/5587/11188_CE(RA1)_F(T)_PF1(NJAK)_PFA(AK)_PF2(PAG).pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT tanvipanwala toevaluatethedifferentrapidscreeningtestsfordiagnosisofleptospirosis
AT sangeetarajdev toevaluatethedifferentrapidscreeningtestsfordiagnosisofleptospirosis
AT summaiyamulla toevaluatethedifferentrapidscreeningtestsfordiagnosisofleptospirosis