Trust in the smart home: Findings from a nationally representative survey in the UK.
Businesses in the smart home sector are actively promoting the benefits of smart home technologies for consumers, such as convenience, economy and home security. To better understand meanings of and trust in the smart home, we carried out a nationally representative survey of UK consumers designed t...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2020-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231615 |
| _version_ | 1819021038327955456 |
|---|---|
| author | Sara Cannizzaro Rob Procter Sinong Ma Carsten Maple |
| author_facet | Sara Cannizzaro Rob Procter Sinong Ma Carsten Maple |
| author_sort | Sara Cannizzaro |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Businesses in the smart home sector are actively promoting the benefits of smart home technologies for consumers, such as convenience, economy and home security. To better understand meanings of and trust in the smart home, we carried out a nationally representative survey of UK consumers designed to measure adoption and acceptability, focusing on awareness, ownership, experience, trust, satisfaction and intention to use. We analysed the results using theories of meanings and acceptability of technologies including semiotics, social construction of technology (SCOT) and sociotechnical affordance. Our findings suggest that the meaning and value proposition of the smart home have not yet achieved closure for consumers, but is already foregrounding risks to privacy and security amongst the other meaning-making possibilities it could afford. Anxiety about the likelihood of a security incident emerges as a prominent factor influencing adoption of smart home technology. This factor negatively impacts adoption. These findings underline how businesses and policymakers will need to work together to act on the sociotechnical affordances of smart home technology in order to increase consumers' trust. This intervention is necessary if barriers to adoption and acceptability of the smart home are to be addressed now and in the future. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-21T04:00:45Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-a7b57e3ae2f3445483ce680bd991ec33 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-21T04:00:45Z |
| publishDate | 2020-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-a7b57e3ae2f3445483ce680bd991ec332022-12-21T19:16:44ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01155e023161510.1371/journal.pone.0231615Trust in the smart home: Findings from a nationally representative survey in the UK.Sara CannizzaroRob ProcterSinong MaCarsten MapleBusinesses in the smart home sector are actively promoting the benefits of smart home technologies for consumers, such as convenience, economy and home security. To better understand meanings of and trust in the smart home, we carried out a nationally representative survey of UK consumers designed to measure adoption and acceptability, focusing on awareness, ownership, experience, trust, satisfaction and intention to use. We analysed the results using theories of meanings and acceptability of technologies including semiotics, social construction of technology (SCOT) and sociotechnical affordance. Our findings suggest that the meaning and value proposition of the smart home have not yet achieved closure for consumers, but is already foregrounding risks to privacy and security amongst the other meaning-making possibilities it could afford. Anxiety about the likelihood of a security incident emerges as a prominent factor influencing adoption of smart home technology. This factor negatively impacts adoption. These findings underline how businesses and policymakers will need to work together to act on the sociotechnical affordances of smart home technology in order to increase consumers' trust. This intervention is necessary if barriers to adoption and acceptability of the smart home are to be addressed now and in the future.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231615 |
| spellingShingle | Sara Cannizzaro Rob Procter Sinong Ma Carsten Maple Trust in the smart home: Findings from a nationally representative survey in the UK. PLoS ONE |
| title | Trust in the smart home: Findings from a nationally representative survey in the UK. |
| title_full | Trust in the smart home: Findings from a nationally representative survey in the UK. |
| title_fullStr | Trust in the smart home: Findings from a nationally representative survey in the UK. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Trust in the smart home: Findings from a nationally representative survey in the UK. |
| title_short | Trust in the smart home: Findings from a nationally representative survey in the UK. |
| title_sort | trust in the smart home findings from a nationally representative survey in the uk |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231615 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT saracannizzaro trustinthesmarthomefindingsfromanationallyrepresentativesurveyintheuk AT robprocter trustinthesmarthomefindingsfromanationallyrepresentativesurveyintheuk AT sinongma trustinthesmarthomefindingsfromanationallyrepresentativesurveyintheuk AT carstenmaple trustinthesmarthomefindingsfromanationallyrepresentativesurveyintheuk |