2016 Central Italy Earthquakes: comparison between GPS signals and low-cost distributed MEMS arrays

<p>Modern seismic ground-motion sensors have reached an excellent performance quality in terms of dynamic range and bandwidth resolution. The weakest point in the recording of seismic events remains spatial sampling and spatial resolution, due to the limited number of installed sensors. A sign...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: N. Cenni, J. Boaga, F. Casarin, G. De Marchi, M. R. Valluzzi, G. Cassiani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2019-08-01
Series:Advances in Geosciences
Online Access:https://www.adv-geosci.net/51/1/2019/adgeo-51-1-2019.pdf
_version_ 1811286018046820352
author N. Cenni
J. Boaga
F. Casarin
G. De Marchi
M. R. Valluzzi
G. Cassiani
author_facet N. Cenni
J. Boaga
F. Casarin
G. De Marchi
M. R. Valluzzi
G. Cassiani
author_sort N. Cenni
collection DOAJ
description <p>Modern seismic ground-motion sensors have reached an excellent performance quality in terms of dynamic range and bandwidth resolution. The weakest point in the recording of seismic events remains spatial sampling and spatial resolution, due to the limited number of installed sensors. A significant improvement in spatial resolution can be achieved by the use of non-conventional motion sensors, such as low-cost distributed sensors arrays or positioning systems, capable of increasing the density of classical seismic recording networks. In this perspective, we adopted micro-electro mechanical system (MEMS) sensors to integrate the use of standard accelerometers for moderate-to-strong seismic events. In addition, we analyse high-rate distributed positioning system data that also record soil motion. In this paper, we present data from the 2016 Central Italy earthquakes as recorded by a spatially dense prototype MEMS array installed in the proximity of the epicentral area, and we compare the results to the signal of local 1s GPS stations. We discuss advantages and limitations of this joint approach, reaching the conclusion that such low-cost sensors and the use of high rate GPS signal could be an effective choice for integrate the spatial density of stations providing strong-motion parameters.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-13T02:52:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a7b768aa45bc478fa0153be3e5acf859
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1680-7340
1680-7359
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T02:52:32Z
publishDate 2019-08-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Advances in Geosciences
spelling doaj.art-a7b768aa45bc478fa0153be3e5acf8592022-12-22T03:05:48ZengCopernicus PublicationsAdvances in Geosciences1680-73401680-73592019-08-015111410.5194/adgeo-51-1-20192016 Central Italy Earthquakes: comparison between GPS signals and low-cost distributed MEMS arraysN. Cenni0J. Boaga1F. Casarin2G. De Marchi3M. R. Valluzzi4G. Cassiani5Department of Geosciences, University of Padova, Padova, 35130, ItalyDepartment of Geosciences, University of Padova, Padova, 35130, ItalyEXPIN srl, Spin-off University of Padova, Padova, 35130, ItalyAD.EL srl, Venice, 30100, ItalyDepartment of Cultural Heritage DBC, University of Padova, Padova, 35130, ItalyDepartment of Geosciences, University of Padova, Padova, 35130, Italy<p>Modern seismic ground-motion sensors have reached an excellent performance quality in terms of dynamic range and bandwidth resolution. The weakest point in the recording of seismic events remains spatial sampling and spatial resolution, due to the limited number of installed sensors. A significant improvement in spatial resolution can be achieved by the use of non-conventional motion sensors, such as low-cost distributed sensors arrays or positioning systems, capable of increasing the density of classical seismic recording networks. In this perspective, we adopted micro-electro mechanical system (MEMS) sensors to integrate the use of standard accelerometers for moderate-to-strong seismic events. In addition, we analyse high-rate distributed positioning system data that also record soil motion. In this paper, we present data from the 2016 Central Italy earthquakes as recorded by a spatially dense prototype MEMS array installed in the proximity of the epicentral area, and we compare the results to the signal of local 1s GPS stations. We discuss advantages and limitations of this joint approach, reaching the conclusion that such low-cost sensors and the use of high rate GPS signal could be an effective choice for integrate the spatial density of stations providing strong-motion parameters.</p>https://www.adv-geosci.net/51/1/2019/adgeo-51-1-2019.pdf
spellingShingle N. Cenni
J. Boaga
F. Casarin
G. De Marchi
M. R. Valluzzi
G. Cassiani
2016 Central Italy Earthquakes: comparison between GPS signals and low-cost distributed MEMS arrays
Advances in Geosciences
title 2016 Central Italy Earthquakes: comparison between GPS signals and low-cost distributed MEMS arrays
title_full 2016 Central Italy Earthquakes: comparison between GPS signals and low-cost distributed MEMS arrays
title_fullStr 2016 Central Italy Earthquakes: comparison between GPS signals and low-cost distributed MEMS arrays
title_full_unstemmed 2016 Central Italy Earthquakes: comparison between GPS signals and low-cost distributed MEMS arrays
title_short 2016 Central Italy Earthquakes: comparison between GPS signals and low-cost distributed MEMS arrays
title_sort 2016 central italy earthquakes comparison between gps signals and low cost distributed mems arrays
url https://www.adv-geosci.net/51/1/2019/adgeo-51-1-2019.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT ncenni 2016centralitalyearthquakescomparisonbetweengpssignalsandlowcostdistributedmemsarrays
AT jboaga 2016centralitalyearthquakescomparisonbetweengpssignalsandlowcostdistributedmemsarrays
AT fcasarin 2016centralitalyearthquakescomparisonbetweengpssignalsandlowcostdistributedmemsarrays
AT gdemarchi 2016centralitalyearthquakescomparisonbetweengpssignalsandlowcostdistributedmemsarrays
AT mrvalluzzi 2016centralitalyearthquakescomparisonbetweengpssignalsandlowcostdistributedmemsarrays
AT gcassiani 2016centralitalyearthquakescomparisonbetweengpssignalsandlowcostdistributedmemsarrays